It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ibgrimme
There's sort of something missing in the dollar bill symbol that makes it incomplete. In the full symbol, off to the left, is a little man in a tophat. He is levitated in the air so as to stare the "all seeing eye" directly in the eye.
I would much rather be in a tophat than to be a stone block.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by AugustusMasonicus
The problem with that is, These masons are you governors, Presidents, Mayors, Judges, Bank owners and cooperate ceo's. During the dark ages they were forced to go underground because of the catholics. They have mastered the skills of working in the dark.
Originally posted by RealityisanIllusion
The Masons weren't around during the Dark Ages. I believe the first recoreded record from a Lodge of Masons was around 1732. Quite a while after the Dark Ages.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by AugustusMasonicus
Man I am a third degree master mason and an officer of my lodge. thank you for telling the truth. for to long i have heard all of these rumors and it makes me sick. I think it is just that they do not know anything about the masons so they come to the conclusion that there is a conspiracy. It is just a secret organization with history and brotherhood involved. And I think God that somone out there sees that. It is a shame that everyone has to have somthing to complain about. I am also a devout christian so there is no way I would ever worship satan and when people say stuff like that it makes me look bad. Everyone needs to learn that just becouse you do not understand something does not mean it is evil or a conspiracy.
Originally posted by FrankieBnz
OMG! My $80K college education pays off (History/PoliSci)! I can cite it if you really want, but this all information that is very verifiable with some simple google searches.
1. There were masons on both sides of the revolution, both revolutionaries and loyalists, as well as british.
3. Many, but not all the leaders of the revolution were masons. It was a common fraternity to join at that time, but due to a multitude of reasons much like today, many chose not to.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Modern speculative Masonry is typically considered to have arisen after the Dark Ages and is one of the main contributors to the and the Age of Enlightenment.
[edit on 20-5-2008 by AugustusMasonicus]
I don't see how Freemasonry as an ideology contributed to the Renaissance. However, I do note that the Renaissance was a cultural movement of European intellectual life in the early modern period from the 14th century to the 17th. Freemasonry took a grip in Europe in the early 18th century and eventually incorporating unaffiliated guilds.
These precursors of Freemasonry, guilds, were redoubts of traditional and ossified crafts that were monopolised with the population of Europe exploited. Collusive trading was the norm and graft was the agenda. In a way, these secretive trade societies were a hangover from the Dark Ages and early Carolingian cathedral builders. They kept Europe backwards.
It is generally accepted that the Renaissance began in Tuscany in Italy with influence of rational humanism on art, politics and religion to a minor extent; later spreading to the rest of Europe by the 16th century.
More interestingly, the rational approach in observing the physical world and metaphysical thought was a consequence of the interface of the Islamic world and the southern and eastern regions of modern day Italy where there was a transfer of knowledge. This Islamic influence affected literature, philosophy, art, politics and science.
Freemasonry had very little to do with sparking or contributing to the Renaissance. That's just fanciful thinking.
Originally posted by Capozzelli
I have another question. If freemasonsry is not a religous group why does it say in your ritual "It is so far interwoven with religion as to lay us under obligation to pay that homage to the diety which at once constitutes our duty and our happiness"? It looks like religion is a big part of masonry. Can any of you masons explain this to me?
I don't know any verifiable stories about the American Revolution, but I've heard some apocryphal tales about both the Civil War and the Texas Revolution.
Originally posted by Capozzelli
Do you know any times where masons fought against each other in the war? How did they treat each other?
I have another question. If freemasonsry is not a religous group why does it say in your ritual "It is so far interwoven with religion as to lay us under obligation to pay that homage to the diety which at once constitutes our duty and our happiness"? It looks like religion is a big part of masonry. Can any of you masons explain this to me?
Originally posted by JoshNorton
While I don't think it's ever been proven that Gen. Santa Anna was a Mason, the story goes that he used signs of distress and/or recognition when he surrendered to Sam Houston's men in hopes of sparing his life. Some of the tale is covered here.
Good question, and I don't have any answers that would be particularly satisfying, I don't think. One of the big lessons of the 3rd degree is that we're all going to die.
We're taught to be good, to make a difference, to help our fellow man, our communities, etc and live our lives doing those good deeds so that when our time has come, if there is an afterlife, we are welcomed to it.
Now, sure, a lot of bible-thumping Christians will jump in at this point and declare that if you haven't accepted Jesus Christ as your Saviour then you won't get into heaven no matter how many good deeds you've done. (In fact, there are probably many who believe they're going to heaven just because they believe in Jesus, when they themselves have never lifted a finger to help their fellow man or live by Jesus' teachings...)
It's certainly not for everybody. The question is, regardless of organized dogma or proscribed beliefs, when you have an inner monologue, is it a monologue or a dialogue? Are you talking to yourself, or are you comfortable thinking that there IS something else out there, whatever it is. If you can reconcile your own spirituality with the traditions of Freemasonry, you'll probably be fine. Know that because Masonry IS an old tradition, if there's something that you don't like, it's not likely you'll be able to change it to make you more comfortable. The reconciliation has to be your own.
Originally posted by Capozzelli
Good question, and I don't have any answers that would be particularly satisfying, I don't think. One of the big lessons of the 3rd degree is that we're all going to die.
Yes, but the line I quoted was from the second degree lecture. How does that tie in with dying? It looks like to me it says that you should be religious. I am not religious but I'm spiritual. I don't go to church or anything like that so would this mean that being a mason is not for me or anyone like me?
Personally? No. I don't consider myself religious at all. For years if you'd asked me I probably would have told you that I was agnostic. More recently I decided that Deist was probably the best description for how I feel and what I believe.... that there IS something bigger than us, but that whatever it is does not have a hands-on involvement with us, our lives, our planet, etc.
We're taught to be good, to make a difference, to help our fellow man, our communities, etc and live our lives doing those good deeds so that when our time has come, if there is an afterlife, we are welcomed to it.
I understand this part. Alot of maosns have explained this to me. Do you feel that you need to be religious to do this?