This is funny and yet another media channel trying to jump on the Anti-China bandwagon.
Videos --> ALL WESTERN MSM
footages and editting, and we all know they are biased and lying.
Photos --> Only first 20 or something pictures show some very physical bodies etc, the rest are are merely some normal pictures. Questions are from
where the sources come and how many of those are actually Chinese victims with wrong text? If some of you take the liberty to scroll down first, you
can see that Wikileaks even posted some of the pictures which are actually the VICTIMS of RIOTERS.
Man lying down --> confirmed to be a Han Chinese who was hurt, this was a picture mis-used by many Western MSM claiming that it was a Tibetan and also
implied by Wikileaks.
Wikileaks: "In this image made from video and provided by APTN, a protestor speaks with authorities, Friday, March 14, 2008, in Lhasa, Tibet.
Police fired tear gas to disperse Buddhist monks and others staging a second day of protests Saturday in western China in sympathy with anti-Chinese
demonstrations in Lhasa, local residents said. (AP Photo/APTN)"
Well well, I did not know the Nepalese police is working for the Chinese government in Lahsa.
STOP LYING! START DENYING IGNORANCE!
Wikileaks:"** THIS CORRECTS SOURCE ** In this undated image taken Sunday, March 16, 2008, from China's CCTV and provided by APTN, Japanese
tourists are led by police on a street in Lhasa, capital of southwest China's Tibet Autonomous Region. Tibet's exiled government said Sunday that 80
people had been killed during protests in Lhasa as armed police and soldiers patrolled the capital's streets, enforcing a strict curfew in a security
clampdown following violent demonstrations that drew negative publicity for China ahead of the Beijing Olympics. (AP Photo/CCTV via APTN) ** TV
OUT, CHINA OUT **. Captured by Chinese TV but censored on other sites with differeing context."
Ironically Wikileaks apprently don't care so much of putting on the right text on each photo either. Or maybe Wikileaks mean the picture was censored
on Western MSM sites with different contexts?
Another case confirmed to be a Han Chinese. Wikileaks implied it was yet another Tibetan.
One can only wonder what this site's motives are and what their agenda are. I have no mood in checking all the descriptions, which obviously lack any
kind of reporting ethics.
Talking about sensational "independent neutral" reporting. I have yet to find any pictures and video footages from pro-Chinese protesters. Or is it
an inconvenient truth? If Wikileaks decide to only post pictures and footages to fuel the Anti-China sentiments in the West, at least do some homework
and remove the obvious lies.
EDIT: Note, I see that Wikileaks is blocked in mainland China now, for a good reason. Though I would rather see it being unblocked, because it will
only be an extra proof how hypocrit and how these kinds of anti-China sites works with double-standards. (I was in Hong Kong this morning).
[edit on 13/4/08 by IchiNiSan]