It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OhZone
It would make more sense that the "first" human was a woman.
However the writers of these documents were male supremists.
Originally posted by OhZone
It would make more sense that the "first" human was a woman.
However the writers of these documents were male supremists.
Why do you think that men have breasts? This is the residual evidence that they were created from a female.
There are not male and female bacteria. They are both sexes within one.
Note that in all lower life forms the workers are female.
Female is the "default" sex.
Asexual creatures are basicly female. They produce the "sperm" that impregnates themselves and then they lay eggs, and out comes more asexual creatures.
Originally posted by Conspiriology
If we it were genitalia based, we would have more than nipples left over inside us. You know like remant fallopian tubes, uterus, maybe a recurring itch behind the pubic bone above the penis from some remnant G-spot?
Originally posted by dominicus
if this translation from "rib" to "cell" is true....it gives much credibilty to alternative theories to Genesis and the Old Testament, some of which were even proposed by the Gnostics.
Tsela`
1. side, rib, beam
a) rib (of man)
b) rib (of hill, ridge, etc)
c) side-chambers or cells (of temple structure)
d) rib, plank, board (of cedar or fir)
e) leaves (of door)
f) side (of ark)