It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by budski
So it's deemed acceptable to mock a persons faith and beliefs.
I don't call it childish, I call it people taking their religion seriously.
To me it matters not a jot, but if these petitioners feel strongly about this then they have every right to protest - and those who mock are only showing their own childish nature.
Originally posted by AshleyD
This is interesting. It is pretty well known Islam considers it to be a form of idolatry to show an image of Mohammad. I noticed the Wikipedia article showed images of Mohammad several months and was surprised they had been posted.
I could understand not wanting an image of Allah but why not Mohammad? He was only a human being.
www.foxnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by AshleyD
Since Islam diverted from Judaism, Muhammad brought back Jewish customs.. of course adding his own teachings.. essentially is Arabized Judaism to better fit the people.. but kept some of the Judaic tradition.
Originally posted by deltaboy
I don't see in the Koran that forbids the images of Prophet Mohammed. I don't understand why they should try, unless they are trying to making him divine by making the perception that he is not a normal looking man. Unless he was never a man with pictures of him with a veil on it. I guess all Muslim males should wear veils now.
[edit on 8-2-2008 by deltaboy]
Islam and Christianity are both just sects of Judaism.
There really isn't much distance between these religions
BTW, Iran has about 50,000 Jews, and the Jewish religion is recognized and protected by the Iranian constitution. This is something that isn't often noted. Iran may detest the state of Israel, but they actually practice some degree of tolerance for Judaism and Christianity.
Originally posted by AshleyD
A). Should Wikipedia keep the images up since they are a privately owned site and they have the right to post the images for educational and illustrative purposes?
B). Should Wikipedia take down the images out of respect? If they do, do you think this could cause a chain reactions of other "offensive" material regarding Islam being taken down?
Originally posted by AshleyD
Phoenix, I get the impression you are a Muslim (please correct me if I am wrong) so hopefully you can offer us some insight into this issue. Is it against the Koran to show images of Mohammad or are the radicals taking something out of context? Thanks.
Originally posted by AshleyD
So you two are disagreeing with the above posters who said it was explicitly stated in the Koran? Just asking. I don't know either way.
Phoenix, I get the impression you are a Muslim (please correct me if I am wrong) so hopefully you can offer us some insight into this issue. Is it against the Koran to show images of Mohammad or are the radicals taking something out of context? Thanks.