It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jfj123
So then you have no idea if a medium was used or not. YES or NO?
[edit on 24-1-2008 by jfj123]
Originally posted by OrionStars
Laser beams are beams of light. Do you understand how colors are naturally or unnaturally refracted and reflected out from light beams?
If not, you can learn something about colored laser beams at this website:
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by OrionStars
I think he/she find's it frustrating because you are the only one that can't see through it. I am concerned for your eye sight. Please make an appointment ASAP.
When I want your snide advice, I will ask for it. Are we clear on that?
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
So then you have no idea if a medium was used or not. YES or NO?
[edit on 24-1-2008 by jfj123]
Are you asking if they were hermetically sealed self-projecting holograms? If so, again, I have no idea. I was not there to ask.
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by Question
FYI,
I can see right through the freakin things !!!! Good post !!!!
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
The real jets by remote control being "easier"- etc argument is absurd.
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
Get yourself a copy of "CNN Remembers" or "Why the towers fell"(PBS) or download(takes a long time but i have downloaded every archived full resolution video of the event I can find) the "LIVE" videos. NO PLANES- No wreckage- no impact- no luggage flying, fuel splattering-NOTHING.
Nothing but the image of a plane disapearing into a building like sliding a photo of an airplane behind a photo of a building. The videos are FAKE.
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
I have some theories on how it might have been done,as I just posted, but I think HOW it was done is not as important as the fact that 19 jerks from Saudi Arabia did not fly jets into the buildings. FAKE VIDEOS FOLKS.
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
my suggestion is to focus on pointing out to as many people as you can that the "official CT" is completley absurd and physically provable as false!
Originally posted by jfj123
I can see through the holograms. So that's 1.
Would everyone please review the 2 pictures and honestly tell us whether they can see through the holograms or not???? I would greatly appreciate it.
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by OrionStars
Regarding your other statement, I don't have a side. I am simply posting factual information and request everyone else, regardless of point of view, do the same.
Originally posted by deezee
Originally posted by jfj123
I can see through the holograms. So that's 1.
Would everyone please review the 2 pictures and honestly tell us whether they can see through the holograms or not???? I would greatly appreciate it.
If you mean that picture of a mouse and some other objects in special enclosed containers, then yes, i could see through it as well.
Originally posted by Spoodily
I didn't read the whole thread, just the OP. Sorry if I'm reposting this information. Please click on the link in my signature.
This one.
"When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing"
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
Regarding your other statement, I don't have a side. I am simply posting factual information and request everyone else, regardless of point of view, do the same.
Why do people unrealistically keep saying that?
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by deezee
Originally posted by jfj123
I can see through the holograms. So that's 1.
Would everyone please review the 2 pictures and honestly tell us whether they can see through the holograms or not???? I would greatly appreciate it.
If you mean that picture of a mouse and some other objects in special enclosed containers, then yes, i could see through it as well.
You are on the opposing view side. Your response comes as no surprise. That is not going to change what I saw as opposed to what you state you saw. I could care less who states it was seen the way you saw it. I did not. I do not follow opinion simply because it is easier than opposing it. I never have.
Originally posted by OrionStars
You are on the opposing view side. Your response comes as no surprise.
Originally posted by OrionStars
That is not going to change what I saw as opposed to what you state you saw. I could care less who states it was seen the way you saw it. I did not. I do not follow opinion simply because it is easier than opposing it. I never have.