It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by space cadet
Meth is not an industry that is or will become 'regulated' per say by the government. It is illegal and will remain illegal.
If a person on meth kills someone because they are geeking or tweeking, it could have been avoided by the limit of access to manufacture meth.
If a person dies because years of meth use has broken their body down, it is not just their fault, regulation and law should have protected them.
Do you honestly think that the manufacture of meth should be a choice?
I am all for legalization of marijuana, but it is a natural herb, it IS something we should be allowed to choose to do or not do, but meth is a whole nother story.
To stop it's manufacture is not to take away your freedom. It is to protect the user and society.
Originally posted by space cadet
reply to post by EnlightenUp
So no matter how deadly something is, your point is that you should have the right to purchase it for manufacturing an even deadlier product, because you feel that otherwise it is infringing upon your freedom?
Maybe we should be able to purchase ricin as well? How about belladonna, it has medical benefits too, but it should be our right to paralyze our nervous systems right? The hell with children's safety, as long as it doesn't bother your right to buy it.
Oh and there's rhubarb leaves, they aren't illegal at all, you do have the right to grow or purchase them, freedom intact, and you might want to cook up the leaves and eat them, still got your freedom but damn, your dead.
Freedom does not come without a price or rules. The reason behind that is to protect people.
reply to post by EnlightenUp
My main concern with ricin would be another's handling of the material. If it plays a legitimate part in someon'es personal and peaceful research and invention, then I have no qualms on that account. It shouldn't be criminal in itself.
reply to post by darklife
Correction on the person who insinuated belladonna is illegal to posses.. It's not. Just like any of the other plants from the tropane family and many of the plants grow wild all over the US. One of the most common in the US being Datura, better known as jimson weed which is toxic but in small doses can cause delirium and in even smaller doses can be used for allergies, induce sleep and so on.
Originally posted by space cadet
reply to post by EnlightenUp
You do know the definition of 'assiduously'? You just stated that I am putting words into your mouth quite assiduously, that would mean I am doing so using care and persistance.
The hell with children's safety, as long as it doesn't bother your right to buy it.
But you think it should be your right, and freedom, to do whatever you want with it.
I used your own words about ricin, and then applied the same statement as if we were discussing ephedrine instead, you don't want ricin in the wrong hands, you understand why it is not. But you continue to think your freedom is lost if you can only buy enough ephedrine contianing products to last you a month.
Kentucky's problem may not be due in total to the regulation of ephedrine, other scenarios may apply. One example would be the sheer ablilty to access locations in the mountianous range, police corruotion could also be a factor.
I know that in my town, busting smurfers is making a difference. Fewer labs mean less products.
And you are absolutely correct in your assumption that I have a personal interest in the matter. My brother blew himself up in a meth lab. There were children in the home. He bought the ephedrine himself, going store to store purchasing the limit per location.