It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bodrul
I don’t want to offend anyone in this topic
or anything just to make that clear
for decades women have fought for the rights that were stricken from them in the UK surfer jets and so on.
These days I seem to see and read allot in the news how courts are more biased towards women in the UK and other western countries
examples Range from
Children in divorce cases in almost all cases the mother gets custody but the father almost gets none
or where the wife gets almost everything even if they haven’t contributed anything in the first place, (there was this one report where a woman was complaining that she only got half the property from her ex because she want married to him and only gets support for her kids from him)
also the most recent is the Embryo court case where the person didn’t want his ex using his frozen sperm to fertilize his ex. frozen eggs,
because of emotional ties it would start.
Also we have a recent one where a woman doesn’t have to tell if she pregnant or that she’s giving the child away for adoption to the biological father.
A British woman who was left infertile following cancer treatment cannot use her frozen embryos to have a baby against the wishes of her former fiance, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled.
Natallie Evans and her former partner Howard Johnston had created six embryos using their eggs and sperm during fertility treatment, but Mr Johnston withdrew his consent for them to be used after the couple broke up.
Ms Evans, 35, says the embryos represent her only chance of having a child of her own and that refusal was a breach of her human rights. But the European Court upheld a High Court judgment that the continuing consent of both man and woman was needed throughout fertility procedures.
Originally posted by stumason
Personally, i think that each case should be dealt with individually, but as is demonstrated by the above two posters, there is some belief that men are somehow less capable parents
Originally posted by stumason
I split from the mother of my child some 3 years ago, but lucky for me, I share everything 50/50 with her. If anything, I am described by any and all as a much more capable parent than the mother, yet the system favours her no matter what. Also, my father raised me and my bro and sister when my mother walked out when i was 12.
The system NEVER chased her for any money, and she went so far as to stop allowing visits by us when I was 14. Haven't spoken to her since. She left my dad with a mountain of debt, two mortgages and in quite a poorly condition. Where was the system then?
Originally posted by stumason
You never get it chasing wayward mothers
Originally posted by stumason
just the fathers it seems, even if the father is TRYING to be involved, but is being blocked by a bitch of a mother.
Originally posted by stumason
The system favours women, that cannot be argued against, at least in regards to family law.
Originally posted by stumason
Many good men are stripped of all they possess, whilst the ex is given it all, whilst still receiving maintainence off the father, who is forced to live in a bedsit living off pot noodles until the kids grow up.
Originally posted by stumason
I've even heard of women, who themselves had affairs, not the men, who then go on to strip the husband of his assets AND only allow him to see his kids 4 times a year. Is that justice? If you think so, then your sick.