It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The top coalition commander in Iraq, General David Petraeus, has warned that combatting the Iraqi insurgency could take decades as a poll finds a third of Australians are prepared to stay the course with an increasingly uncertain US.
Anybody ... would recognise that these are long-term endeavours," Petraeus said, referring to counter-insurgency operations. "Northern Ireland, I think, taught you (the British) that very very well. My counterparts in your (British) forces really understand this kind of operation."
He added that reconciliation in the British province "took a long time, decades. I don't know whether this will be decades, but the average counter-insurgency is somewhere around a nine or a 10-year endeavour".
*snip*
Nearly half of all Newspoll respondents are now anti-war: 26 percent of those surveyed wanted a definite date set for the withdrawal of Australian troops from Iraq, with 23 per cent saying they wanted the diggers brought home immediately.
But the single biggest bloc of voters — 31 percent — said the troops should remain as long as the Iraqi government wanted them, while 14 percent supported a mid-2008 withdrawal.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Last I remember 3 in 10 is not a majority.
I find this poll very suspicous, how many people were interview, 3?
with one an american businessman???
We have no right to be there, the US has no right to be there, Iraq did NOTHING to us, OR the USA.
that 30% are the same 30% that believe howard when he says
'' We are not there for oil security ''
There the same 30% that write to the west australian opinions section with:
" How can one Australian feel safe while 1 muslim is within our borders "
We're becoming as gullable as the American's... spose it was enevitable.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Last I remember 3 in 10 is not a majority.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
We have no right to be there, the US has no right to be there, Iraq did NOTHING to us, OR the USA.
Originally posted by Weapon X
Hmmmmmm, last time I checked I didn't trust many people, LET ALONE Politicians.
And who's to say we have no right to be there????? I'm sure the Kurds would agree with you after he gassed and slaughtered them right??? I'm sure the Israeli's would agree with you when he lobbed a heap of missiles into Israeli neighbourhood's, and CIVILIAN neighbourhood's at that. But maybe I'm just in a disagreeable mood.
Although, I must admit, as much of a complete bastard that Saddam Hussein was, he did a bloody great job of keeping Insurgents and terrorists in check. You have to give him that, no matter what your stance on the Iraq War is.
quoted by itguysrule
Do you not remember the first Gulf War? Was that not a LEGAL war authorized by the all powerful and glorious UN? Did Iraq not kill and wound US and Australian troops? Did that war never really end but only go into a farcical truce that Iraq never really honored? Did Iraq not offer cash payments to the families of homicide bombers who killed Israeli and American citizens in their attacks?
So you think we have no right to be there - - -
We live in a different world than we did before the advent of WMD. In the 1930's we could sit behind our giant oceans and feel perfectly safe because we could see any major attack coming months or years in advance. In today's world we are confronted by weapons that can destroy whole cities and millions of people with not even a few minutes warning. We can no longer simply sit back and respond to any attack. The first attack could kill more Americans or Australians than died in both world wars.