It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
My point in relation to abortion and "gay rights" is that gays have more rights than babies at this point. Arent we in America, "One nation, with liberty and justice for ALL"
I agree. If two guys or two girls want to have a wedding to celebrate their relationship and live in each other's pockets & have the same rights as other folk then, why not? It's their private personal business. And if a girl wants to have an abortion, then that's her private personal business too. Who am I as a stranger to decide what's best for her. I have my own business to attend to. I mean, if she keeps on doing it, then she might need her head looked, and perhaps someone could advise sterilisation. But that's between her and her doctor, it's not my business nor is it yours. It beats me though, why some folk think they have the right to decide for others. It's like some sort of ancient witch hunt behaviour. There's a helluva lot worse going on in the world. Get your nose stuck into something that's helpful.If someone's coming at you with a pickaxe, then you have the right to interfere with their life. If someone's lying in your street starving, then you have the right to interfere with their life. Tthey might not want to be fed though, then you should back off and get on with your own business.
Originally posted by Biggs
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Why should a gay person have the right to live and a baby not. It is forbidden to kill infants.
Why should you get decide who lives?
You are worse than Al-Qaeda and the Nazi's combined.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
If gay people have rights and put their sinful "partner" on an insurance plan or such, why cant my friends brother put his own brother on his insurance plan???
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONALWhy is it that gays are banning the nonsinful people as in australia from places.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Why is it that gays have a right to live and a small baby does not.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
And i dont like my mom anyway she shouldnt get any rights either. HAHA.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONALThe other half of the baby came from the father.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONALBut why do we allow this, seeming that you also agree it is wrong.
Originally posted by Biggs
Why is it the my gay brother get his ass beat and you don't?
Thats messed up he should go on the right path. You should be guide him.
Originally posted by Biggs
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
My point in relation to abortion and "gay rights" is that gays have more rights than babies at this point. Arent we in America, "One nation, with liberty and justice for ALL"
Gays have more rights than babys?
IT IS A HETERO RIGHT TO HAVE AN ABORTION>IT ISNT GAYS HAVING ABORTIONS IT IS STRAIGHT PEOPLE LIKE YOU
WE THE PEOPLE NOT WE THE unGAY
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Is this a parasite:
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
a baby needs breastfeeding
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
My point in relation to abortion and "gay rights" is that gays have more rights than babies at this point.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
I dont believe that they should be allowed in a union because God says that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Im sure many kids still in there teens and early adulthood are parasitic to a home and money and would die otherwise. Is that not also parasitic.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
If gay people have rights and put their sinful "partner" on an insurance plan or such, why cant my friends brother put his own brother on his insurance plan??? This is ridiculous.
Why is it that gays are banning the nonsinful people as in australia from places. I say we ban all gays from everywhere except their houses.
Why is it that gays have a right to live and a small baby does not. Shame on you. What are we coming to.
[edit on 2-6-2007 by THE_PROFESSIONAL]
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Nobody is arguing the best care for a born child. Why are you totally changing the discussion to another subject?
The thread is about abortion rights. I think. It's not about caring for a baby. Or breastfeeding.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
a baby and an embryo that can not survive outside of a host body are two completely separate things. "
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
So if a woman had a siamese twin who was alive would she have the right to shoot it?? I mean it is "her body" as all you folks say.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
a baby and an embryo that can not survive outside of a host body are two completely separate things. "
Yes, they are TWO SEPARATE THINGS. So, why bring one into a discussion about the other? Only to muddy the waters, I suspect.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
So if a woman had a siamese twin who was alive would she have the right to shoot it?? I mean it is "her body" as all you folks say.
No, we folks wouldn't advocate the likking of one's twin. A conjoined twin is born, right? So, no. Once a child is born, the killing of it is murder. I don't understand your confusion on this subject.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
No I said someone from here said they were two separate things, I am providing a counter and saying they are not two separatie things. That was a quote from another person. NOT ME.