posted on Apr, 22 2007 @ 10:42 PM
I would think of materialism more as the "anti-religion" than a religion unto itself
That would be a matter of perspective......
And i guess it could be argued (not with-out some merrit) that they are polar opposites in so far as science deals with physical plane phenomena and
religion basically with meta-physical dimensions.....
(But this devide (i.E between physics and meta-physics) is composed simply of ignorance and so the devide is merely an illusion that illustrates....
not so much an inherent division so much as a chasm in our understanding of reality and the conciousness we posess and the energies that underpin this
conciousness in the universe at large.)
But i would argue that science is not inherently opposed to religion.... although many with-in the establishment's ranks are of this disposition.
Probably because in the early days of modern science..... science was the bastion of the thinking men who saught to wrestle the world from dogmatic
beliefs and herald a new era devorced from consepts which they considered to be deliberately seeking to obscure or deny the emerging truths relating
to newly observed facts relating to the science of nature ETC.....
And this was a tide that the creationists could not hold back......
So the pendulum swings back and fourth.
And in a nut shell the scientists facts are not detremental to the ideas of the mystic.... But the theories they invent to support these facts often
are....
And every body knows that these theories change with each new decade or century.....
And to tell you the truth i believe science will ultimately legitimise religion....
Because it is even beyond the scientist to deny the truth forever.....
Even if it must be realized in a form that looks suspicously similar to some religious doctrine........