It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lost_Mind
In your professional opinion, what is the likelyhood that aircraft lights will not only mantain a consistant level of brightness on approach for this length of time but also remain in the "pattern" they are in with only slight variations of the 9 minutes?
The self proclaimed "check" pattern. There were without a doubt instances of the lights dimming then rebrightening but they seemed to me to always rebrighten in nearly the same spot they dimmed from. I think that there were at least 3 of them that simply did not move from their beginning positions at all.
Wouldnt planes flying at 200-250 kts. experience at least a little buffeting on approach at low speeds? Which in turn would cause very remarkable changes in the orientation, hence brightness, of those lights?
In order for these lights to stay as the are those planes would have to be on a rope coming in, with abosolutely zero cross winds or better yet a monorail considering the probable distances we are thinking about here.
Ive been on many planes of many different types (including military) and have always recollected at least a bit of chop on approach, turning or not.
The one thing that really irks me about this is that the videographer went out of his way to show what an aircraft from his viewpoint actually looked like, some of these either flying at a much quicker pace in front of the lights in question or behind them - they were without a doubt aircraft and they did appear different as presented through the cameras lenses. You could see the nav lights and uneven bright lights due to the aircraft peforming its usual action simply from the act of flying in air, buffeting etc.
Anyway thinking outloud here - feel free to dissimate my ideas....I wont cry, promise....
Originally posted by Starwatcher
ok, I just watched this video for the first time and was somewhat dumbfounded. First thing I want to address. HE sees a plane and zooms in to show the difference between it and the stationary lights.... You all seem to ignore this. Two, the lights move from thier original position and then back, a plane in a holding position would not move to the left and then move back to its original spot as seen on the video. I can see a helicopter manuevering like this but not a commercial airliner. 3rd, there were more than one formation of lights, one set appearing only a few hundred feet from the ground. Again if these are PLANES explain to me as to how so many people that live near this airport can't explain what they are seeing.
Also I am sick of people dishing someone for not having a tri pod or better camera. Look we are not all professional photograghers or ufo hunters so get over it. I myself do not own a camera,camcorder or any of that equipment all I have is my trusty binoculars.
Originally posted by kroms33
Originally posted by Starwatcher
ok, I just watched this video for the first time and was somewhat dumbfounded. First thing I want to address. HE sees a plane and zooms in to show the difference between it and the stationary lights.... You all seem to ignore this. Two, the lights move from thier original position and then back, a plane in a holding position would not move to the left and then move back to its original spot as seen on the video. I can see a helicopter manuevering like this but not a commercial airliner. 3rd, there were more than one formation of lights, one set appearing only a few hundred feet from the ground. Again if these are PLANES explain to me as to how so many people that live near this airport can't explain what they are seeing.
Also I am sick of people dishing someone for not having a tri pod or better camera. Look we are not all professional photograghers or ufo hunters so get over it. I myself do not own a camera,camcorder or any of that equipment all I have is my trusty binoculars.
Ok, I see your points - no need to get upset, we all want to discuss this as openly as we can without making enemies
I do agree that the objects seem to change positions/formations. In previous posts I brought up that all of the lights seem to have the same luminous values... we are still looking into this video - it is interesting to say the least.
I know my mind is not made up about it, because I live near O'Hare and have never seen planes stationary for that long... ever. An air traffic controller who frequents this site agreed to a little experiment - once he can detect this anomaly again (since he believes them to be planes) he will film it for us all to see - and hopefully it will be around 9 minutes of glowing dots that seem to be stationary... but as you have said - the objects do seem to change patterns.
We shall see
Kroms33
Originally posted by Starwatcher
ok, I just watched this video for the first time and was somewhat dumbfounded. First thing I want to address. HE sees a plane and zooms in to show the difference between it and the stationary lights.... You all seem to ignore this. Two, the lights move from thier original position and then back, a plane in a holding position would not move to the left and then move back to its original spot as seen on the video. I can see a helicopter manuevering like this but not a commercial airliner. 3rd, there were more than one formation of lights, one set appearing only a few hundred feet from the ground. Again if these are PLANES explain to me as to how so many people that live near this airport can't explain what they are seeing.
Also I am sick of people dishing someone for not having a tri pod or better camera. Look we are not all professional photograghers or ufo hunters so get over it. I myself do not own a camera,camcorder or any of that equipment all I have is my trusty binoculars.
Originally posted by kroms33
Yeah, I know I am not 'well' off by any means. I don't think that people would logically carry around a tripod with them and I stated that - but I don't think that the person who stated using a 'tripod' meant any harm by it - he was just stating that it would have been nice... the video is pretty clear - although a bit shakey at times...
Originally posted by Lost_Mind
And for the record this particular video is exemplary compared to most.....man has a steadier than usual hand. I think that the best of us would shake the crap out of an extremely digitally zoomed image. A tripod for sure would have been nice tho....
Originally posted by snafu7700
i still couldnt keep the camera steady enough to keep the guys way out at sixty to eighty miles in the picture (which is what i need to satisfy the time requirements of the supposed ufo video), and the auto-focus was scanning in and out, which caused me to lose the targets several times.
Originally posted by Lost_Mind
SNAFU - just a little devils advocate here. If it is so difficult to zoom in and shoot objects 60-80 miles away for you, would that seem to indicate the if the original shooters lights might have been significantly closer, hence much easier to focus on and keep steady? Say the 7-8 miles he has been claiming?
Originally posted by wifeofairius
Truth is, I'm always seeing strange lights, and I have no idea really what they are. They don't really look like planes to me, and they don't move like planes. I go camping a little further south of Chicago, and I see them down there also, where the sky is much clearer and darker at night. Once, the 'craft' with the lights seemed to follow me, shooting back and forth as it also seemed to come closer, and it scared me so badly that I promised myself I'd never look to the sky again.