It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
How many of you have thought about what you are proposing? Are you saying the BBC was in on a conspiracy to blow up these buildings and murder all these people. Are you also saying that they approve of it and have all remained silent about it because they were part of it? This is what you are saying is it not? What would be their motivation? Why would a bunch of reporters, camera persons, producers and directors be willing to participate in such a huge crime of mass murder? I'm surprised they even bothered to respond to the allegation.
Originally posted by Rotator
There has been an official reply.
www.bbc.co.uk...
Originally posted by talisman
To me it implies that the Building's collapse was LEAKED OUT BEFORE IT HAPPENED!!
1. We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.
2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.
3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in new york on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsuprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did- like everbody else that day she was trying to make sence of what see was seeing; what was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitering feeds and wires services.
4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or the other.
5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today "so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves a conspiracy.
Originally posted by IntoTheVoid
OMG
3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in new york on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsuprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did- like everbody else that day she was trying to make sence of what see was seeing; what was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitering feeds and wires services.
Ok I'll give them that one, everyone forgets things but it seem odd given that she only presented a few facts; the rest was speculation.
Originally posted by XPhiles
Nope I wouldn't give them that one...
If he spoken to her, Jane wouldn't forget seeing the building collapse after her report in question. Surely she remembers that, she must of thought how odd for it to happen after her report.
Originally posted by XPhiles
Nope I wouldn't give them that one...
If he spoken to her, Jane wouldn't forget seeing the building collapse after her report in question. Surely she remembers that, she must of thought how odd for it to happen after her report.
Originally posted by kuhl
Break this story to reporters who are open to this kind of thing.....Do it now
Originally posted by pmexplorer
Originally posted by kuhl
Break this story to reporters who are open to this kind of thing.....Do it now
Hard to break the story to anyone when there is no link
available to the source I would say.