It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

are you a homophobe????

page: 3
1
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 06:17 AM
link   
Cool, I feel better now. By the way you have a cool name!!! Wish I would have thought of a better one.



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 06:34 AM
link   
Isn't a PHOBIA something that you fear??

I don't like homosexuals but I'm not scared of them they just repulse me.



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 07:26 AM
link   
I always thought of a phobia as a fear also, but I guess that's besides the point.

I have nothing wrong with homosexuals. I find most homosexuals friendly people. No, I don't really enjoy the sight of intimacy between two homosexuals, but really, they might not enjoy male/female intimacy. Although either way they'd have to get used to it.

About the normality issue. There's not really a set standard for what's "normal". I bet everyone of us has a fetish, deformity, whatever that isn't of the accepted norm. Well, at least I do.



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 07:45 AM
link   
Saphie, homosexuals do not have any rights as homosexuals. That act is wrong, is immoral and, until the extreme left anti-American, anti-cultural movement was allowed to make serious inroads, was simply taboo.

Humans have rights as humans. In America, the constitution and Bill of Rights protect the rights God gave us, and homosexuality is not a basic human right given by God or protected by anything in our documentation. That act is no more protected than any other sin.

We do have something called freedom of choice, though. But one must be prepared to face the consequences of whatever action one takes. Now, if a couple guys want to pile up into their love shack and defile one another, that effects me in no way, as long as they are of age. But don't try and pass it off as normal but different, don't expect me to go along with endowing them with special treatment, and do not expect me to look upon them as a minority. And whatever anyone does, they'd better not use their positions as educators to teach my children that acts that goes against God's word is A-OK.



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 08:22 AM
link   
Why isn't this thread over on BTS? It has nothing to do with conspiracy or paranormal events. It's even beyond political issues. It's not really a discussion either. People are not solving any of the problems gays are facing right now. Its just an arena where people are slamming or sticking up for gay rights. This thread is just a spill over of this one >>> www.abovetopsecret.com...
Which has grown to epic proportions. It is a never-ending debate. So, again, I pose the question...Why is this an ATS topic?



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 09:08 AM
link   
I have often wondered that as well, but this particular topic pops up here every couple of weeks, runs a bit and then falls to the wayside, only to be replaced by the same thing only different thread.
I figured its tradition by now.



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 05:31 PM
link   
TC: In my world there are no minorities just people. If God divides the gay from the straight on judgement day then so be it. But, until Jesus rides in here on a cloud I say everyone should be treated equally and have the same rights as you and me. They pay taxes and social security they should get a say on who gets their benefits when they die.

Instead, a whole segment of our population is deemed outcast and discriminated against because their behavior doesn't fall in line with christian doctrine. Then, we should say alcoholics and drug addicts can't get married. We should say thieves and killers can't get married. You can't just single out one sin and discriminate against those people that commit it. Our government willingly accepts their taxes without accepting their lifestyle. But, all of sudden when you're talking about marriage it means accepting their lifestyle.



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 06:08 AM
link   
I quite agree saphronia if they included options like being exempt from paying taxes etc into their tired old retoric I could understand it a bit better, as it is they seem to want to have the best of both worlds, marginalise the queers but let them go out to work and pay their tax contributions towards my kids daycare/schooling etc but by God will I bleat if so much as a penny of mine goes towards anything with gay in the title.

I don't quite understand this *the thought of it repulses me* line either. For myself when I meet people I don't have an automatic need to imagine what they do in bed with their husbands/wife/partner. If it repulses you don't think about it.



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 06:17 AM
link   
"high-grade homophobic."

No shyte?



Really not..

I am not *homophobic*..
(I arent scared of them..)

I just know that beign a HOMO is a sin and its unnatural.
(And that they should be given electric shocks to make this sickness go away..)



[Edited on 4-12-2003 by FULCRUM]



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 06:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by DaRAGE
BTW....i do find it very very sick...just the thought...of one man thinking to himself....how much he'd love to shove his cock up some other guys ass...

I think THAT is fully disgusting....and that THEY are mentally disturbed.




Google image search!

3rd row 1st image.. this is what it looks alike..
(shoves his cock up some other guys ass..)



Isnt it beatiful, isnt it all 100% natural?

..

I think not..



*Edit*

Stupid link doesnt work..
(because of the dirty word ban..)

But just do a google search for 'Frock' with capital F..



[Edited on 4-12-2003 by FULCRUM]



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 06:46 AM
link   
So how many porno's have you watched where the woman takes it up the 'arris? More to the point even when it's going into the appropriate hole doesn't it all look pretty disgusting under the cold glare of the studio lights. No doubt pics of you doing the 100% natural act of taking a crap wouldn't sell too well as a calendar either. This is why we tend to do certain acts in private.

That's why your rather emotive response neither validates or invalidates the act in question.

If you don't like it don't look. Simple really.



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 06:46 AM
link   
58 - Your score rates you as "homophobic."

Can't say I'm surprised. Better dash, off to get my nails buffed and back waxed.....

B



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 06:47 AM
link   
You got problems FULCRUM.. . . . . anyone who is a homophobe is to me is the one part of an'anti-cultural' movement, as TC said. Shows ignorance to think that something that is different is wrong. Whats all this 'extreme-left' bull# Mr. Crowne? So you're saying only commies accept Homosexuals? Hmm. . . .thats not really true is it.



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 06:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Seapeople
Hopefully you missed.

Do you like men? Would you shove your weiner up some guys butt? Sexual contact with someone of the opposite sex is normal. If you have some sort of fettish with feet, toes, fingers, the spinal cord, defecation, or anal shoving of the wiener, then yes. There is a problem. These things are not normal. But none the less. Intercourse with someone of the opposite sex is what we humans are on earth to do. To reproduce, and pass our genes on to the next generation. Thats why some animals are brighter in color than others. To attract an animal of the OPPOSITE sex to reproduce and pass on their genes. That is what is normal. Anything else is abnormal and I should not be forced to say it is ok.

So oral sex is wrong?

20 - Your score rates you as "high-grade non-homophobic."

I make jokes about homosexuals but I dont mean them seriously and they know that. I have nothing against gays. If one came onto me then Id just say: "Sorry, Im not gay." I wouldnt be violent because thats like hitting someone for being black/white/whatever.



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 07:02 AM
link   
Lets see if we're going to use the *it 'aint natural* line I do hope all you anti homos stick to a strict sexual regime of no foreplay, no contraception, no oral, no doing it during you're wife/girlfriends unfertile phase, in fact stictly speaking it should be missionary position, on/off and wait for nine months. If it's not intended for procreation then it's WRONG!
Stop it!



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 07:05 AM
link   
There actually are animal species(other than humans) that engage in homsexuality. So I guess those animals are going to hell too. What is natural and what isn't? How do you know? Because that's what you were taught? Because that is what the bible or god says? Give me a break. From what I gather, everyone that is opposed to homosexuality, states that it is not natural. That means that having sex for any other purpose than producing a child is not natural? Oral sex? Masturbation?
I think this subject doesn't have anything to do with being homophobic, but more about feeling secure with your own sexuality. If it scares you or "gives you the creeps" maybe there is another reason behind it. Maybe DEEP down inside you want to experiment. Get over it people and move on.



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 07:15 AM
link   
35 - Your score rates you as "non-homophobic."

Then again, my brother is gay, hehe....



posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 07:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by earthtone

So you're saying only commies accept Homosexuals? Hmm. . . .thats not really true is it.




Not by a long shot..

(only by shot.. a neck shot..)




posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 07:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gazrok
35 - Your score rates you as "non-homophobic."

Then again, my brother is gay, hehe....


Well,

Gays are in the people like the rest of us..

Many of them are very nice people..

They are just 'little' lost..




posted on Dec, 4 2003 @ 07:26 AM
link   
Fulcrum your avatar looks the dead spit of my ex boyfriend. He was in the army too.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join