It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lol semper.....I had to pick a title which attracted attention. I had the exact same post with another title but got 0 replies on that one. So I changed the title.
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
I don't know if I agree with you there - it gives a snapshot picture of an opinion. It may not alway s be accurate, but if bias is eliminated, it has some validity. I mean, why would politicians follow opinion polls so slavishly?
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
OK. 'Terrorist', in my opinion would be someone who blows himself up on a London tube train killing civilians. Or flies a plane into a skyscraper.
I'm not talking about the war in Iraq, or attacks on British or US soldiers that could be seen as occupying forces.
I'm also not talking about unease about U.S. foreign policy in the middle east. Or attacks on Lebanese civilians by the Israelis in the recent war. Or US treatment of the Iraqi population.
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
Would you say that people who kill civilians are terrorists, even they say they do it for Allah? It's really a yes or no answer. And if it's a 'no', then we part company.
You may be disgusted with US foreign policy (a lot of non-muslims are too), but imo, you fight monsters without turning into one yourself.
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
I'm not going to get into an argument with you about this, because it's more about nationalism than religion. Vietnam wasn't muslim, but they fought the same war.
The question I want answering is the one I posed above - do you feel that you can justify 9/11 and 7/7 on religious grounds? I don't.
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
I'm not American, but I do have another question about Ummah. I holidayed in the UAE a few times, and I was interested to see that people that were born there (from Lebanon for example) didn't get citizenship. It could be argued that it only goes so far. I also don't like the way that there is little free press and electoral accountability in the gulf, but as a Brit, I don't like making statements on middle eastern standards after Blair and Iraq!
I also don't think that Kuwait or the UAE are representative of the middle east (although this is off topic) - take away oil, and the economics would resemble Syria or Jordan, which ain't so hot.
But like I said - this is coming back to economics and nationalism, rather than religion.
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
OK. But like I said above - you're more likely to get an impoverished Egyptian, Afghan or Yemeni doing stuff than a Kuwaiti, right?
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
My question wasn't really about US foreign policy, I have my own opinions about that.
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
I think you're probably right. The assholes are the ones that get all the publicity. The people that keep their heads down and try to get a better life for their family get ignored. It's always the way.
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
I don't know what you could do about it. Form a 'muslims for democracy' lobby group if you were so inclined? Stress a commitment to religious pluralism? It's about the only way you'd take publicity away from the lunatics that seem to get all the publicity, in the UK, at least, like Al Mujaroun, and so on.
Originally posted by TaupeDragon
I think the only way around it is to positively engage with the media and present an 'Islam and apple pie' version of your religion. It sounds corny, but there you have it.
Originally posted by Waiting2awake
With all due respect. Wives get beat from every religon. You ever see a fight at an Irish houshold in cabbagetown? Man, the wife took it, the husband took it. Everyone took it. Then they went to church the next day. Beating your wife doesn't happen because of the book you prey too, or the invisible friend you have. It happens because the man is too much of a jerk, and too wrapped up into his own crap to realize that no one has a right to strike another - even if it is your wife.
As for the female circumsizing. I don't agree with it either, but I don't agree with the male version as well. It seems only hypocritical to speak ill of one side, while not decrying the other as well. Are Jews as bad as these people are to you? Is circumsizing a male, better/worse than circumsizing a female? If one is wrong then isn't the other as well?
Originally posted by jsobecky
This is false. I give you two names as proof: Mohammed Atta and Ayman al-Zawahiri.
Originally posted by jsobecky
The First Amendment does not guarantee that you will not be offended, or that someone will not disrespect you. It gives people the right to say whatever they want, with very few exceptions. Offensive and disrespectful statements are not excluded.
That is one of the strengths of the First Amendment.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
The reason most muslims are looked upon with suspicous eyes, is because its up to them to solve this problem.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
When ever we attempt to right some wrongs in regards to muslims, they backlash against us.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
If being muslims, is about peace... then the peaceful muslims should be the ones to OUT the finatical muslims.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
but the most muslims we murder, detain and torture.. just mean more peaceful muslims join the side of the enemy.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
I went out of my way yesterday on an hour long bus trip to sit next to a young muslim girl on the bus.
Not after a phone number, or anything I simply sat next to her with a smile and said hello because she looked like a decent, peace loving individual, someone whom would give me a better understanding of the faith.
IF your to make a difference, search for the good in the faith rather than criticise it.
Originally posted by stanstheman
Perhaps the OP was refering to honor killing which is prevalent among Muslims but not so much among the Irish.
Originally posted by stanstheman
Male circumcision is a religious practice, which has some proven health benefits, female circumcision is a practice of cutting a young girl in order to make sex painful, so the girl won't go out and have sex for pleasure. It's a control tactic used by men, under the auspices of tradition not religion.
cant the muslims question the person insulting the prophet respected by million of people.
Originally posted by semperfortis
cant the muslims question the person insulting the prophet respected by million of people.
Devils advocate here..
We are not saying not to question him...
It's when you kill him, burn his house, his Embassy and stone his businesses that we have a problem..
Semper
Originally posted by usaforever
Simple, don't start a fight you don't have to fight. That's why they get upset, and those too upset may decide to hurt people. So don't clump them together. I've met some of them at my job, and thier just like any other families in the US. Trying to get by, take care of their children, clean the house, cook meals. Their just normal people too, some of them just take things too personaly with what may be going on over there.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Its not your fault, true..
you didnt deserve this task true..
but the world needs your help in removing this cancer.. and your going to refuse it simply because its not your fault?
Originally posted by half_minded
Originally posted by semperfortis
cant the muslims question the person insulting the prophet respected by million of people.
Devils advocate here..
We are not saying not to question him...
It's when you kill him, burn his house, his Embassy and stone his businesses that we have a problem..
Semper
Was that reporter killed? Was his house burned down? Was his embassy stoned?
There is a difference between threatening someone and actually doing it.
You people will not understand that when it comes to prophet mohammad, how much the muslims respect him. So why insult a figure that is respected by million of people? Why provoke the angry ones of the crowd?
I already gave the analogy. Dont poke the sleeping dog and then complain later if he bites you.
Was that reporter killed? Was his house burned down? Was his embassy stoned?
There is a difference between threatening someone and actually doing it.
Muslims kill Nun, burn churches, threaten to kill Pope to prove they are not violent
Not to state the obvious, but Islam really doesn't need a whole lot of help to make themselves look like the Religion of Death; they seem to be able to handle all the heavy lifting by themselves quite nicely without any help from Catholics.
uccatholic.blogspot.com...
A suicide bomber killed 35 people yesterday at a Baghdad restaurant favoured by police and a car bomb killed seven at an army recruiting centre in Tikrit.
There were no Americans in the area, she said. "I do not understand why most of the time it is the Iraqis who are killed."
The blast was the deadliest since a car bomb ripped through a market in a poor Shiite Muslim neighbourhood on the eastern outskirts of Baghdad, killing at least 30 people and wounding 38 on Sept. 19.
www.iranian.ws...
Nigerian Muslims protesting caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad attacked Christians and burned churches on Saturday, killing at least 15 people in the deadliest confrontation yet in the whirlwind of Muslim anger over the drawings.
michellemalkin.com...
Originally posted by half_minded
You people will not understand that when it comes to prophet mohammad, how much the muslims respect him. So why insult a figure that is respected by million of people? Why provoke the angry ones of the crowd?
I already gave the analogy. Dont poke the sleeping dog and then complain later if he bites you.