It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Magnitude 8 Earthquake Could Hit San Andreas

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 15 2006 @ 03:27 PM
San Andreas So Stressed That Earthquake Could occur Of Magnitude 8

San Andreas Fault So Stressed, Next Quake Could Be Magnitude 8

© 2006 by Linda Moulton Howe

"What’s the probability that we’re going to have a large earthquake, magnitude 6, 7 or 8,
on the southern part of the San Andreas Fault? There is about a 70% likelihood of a large
earthquake within the next 30 years." - Seismologist Debi Kilb, Ph.D.

July 27, 2006 La Jolla, California - Last month, the June 22, 2006, issue of the science journal Nature, published recent detailed research of the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults in Southern California. The data shows the San Andreas so stressed that its next quake release of energy could be a magnitude 8 on the Richter scale. The San Andreas Fault is considered the main boundary between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates that are slowly moving past each other. Some day in the far distant future, those moving plates might even break off sections of the Pacific coast into the ocean. The tension between those moving plates is what makes California "earthquake country."

[ Editor's Note: USGS reports that earthquake magnitude "is a measure of the size of an earthquake. The Richter Scale, named after Charles F. Richter of the California Institute of Technology, is the best known scale for the measuring of magnitude (M) of earthquakes. The scale is logarithmic; a recording of 7, for example, signifies a disturbance with ground motion 10 times as large as a recording of 6. The energy released by an earthquake of M 7, however, is approximately 30 times that released by an earthquake of M 6; an earthquake of M 8 releases 900 times (30x30) the energy of an earthquake of M 6. An earthquake of magnitude 2 is the smallest earthquake normally felt by humans. Earthquakes with a Richter value of 5 or higher are potentially damaging. Some of the world's largest recorded earthquakes--on January 31, 1906, off the coast of Colombia and Ecuador, and on March 2, 1933, off the east coast of Honshu, Japan--had magnitudes of 8.9 on this scale, which is open ended.

"As the Richter scale does not adequately differentiate between the largest earthquakes, a new "moment magnitude" scale is being used by seismologists to provide a better measure. On the moment magnitude scale, the San Francisco earthquake is estimated at magnitude 7.7 compared to an estimated Richter magnitude of 8.3.

"Intensity is a measure of the strength of shaking experienced in an earthquake. The Modified Mercalli Scale represents the local effect or damage caused by an earthquake; the "intensity" reported at different points generally decreases away from the earthquake epicenter. The intensity range, from I - XII, is expressed in Roman numerals. For example, an earthquake of intensity II barely would be felt by people favorably situated, while intensity X would produce heavy damage, especially to unreinforced masonry. Local geologic conditions strongly influence the intensity of an earthquake. Commonly, sites on soft ground or alluvium have intensities 2 to 3 units higher than sites on bedrock."]

posted on Aug, 15 2006 @ 07:10 PM
The more I look at this topic I am beginning to feel a chain reaction could occur after a major subduction of the Juan De Fuca plate under the North American plate. This could cause a chain reaction down the west coast of North America that would resonate south to other fault lines that run into the San Andreas.

It's off the coast of Vancouver Island and Washington State that gives me the most concern right now due to the pressure building over the past 200 years.

Watch for more volcanic activity from Mt. St. Helens and Mt. Rainier as indicators of tectonic movement from the coast that forces magma up through these natural release valves.

This is just a guess at best, but the west coast is ready to rock and roll IMO...... :shk:

posted on Aug, 20 2006 @ 01:01 AM
I've been hearing about the "big" earthquake supposed to hit the San Andreas for years, yet it never happeneds when they say it should. Which I'm not complaining, since I live only a few miles away from it.


log in