It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DSO
Instead of paying progressive taxes that increase as income increases, wouldn't a flat tax rate be a lot more fair to the whole of society.
One would pay the same percentage of income, thus different amounts based on your income. Lower incomes would pay the same percentage as the higherincomes, but due to the ammounts of money, the lower income brackets would pay less money then the higher income brackets.
A flat rate tax system would be benifical to the economy since the higher income would have more to spend, thus boosting commerce.
Originally posted by DSO
Instead of paying progressive taxes that increase as income increases, wouldn't a flat tax rate be a lot more fair to the whole of society.
One would pay the same percentage of income, thus different amounts based on your income. Lower incomes would pay the same percentage as the higherincomes, but due to the ammounts of money, the lower income brackets would pay less money then the higher income brackets. This to me would be a lot more fair then the current tax system that makes it bad to be rich and rewards those who don't work as hard (in general). A flat rate tax system would be benifical to the economy since the higher income would have more to spend, thus boosting commerce. It would also restrict the size of governemt since it woudl lower the amount of money avalible to them, forcing effeciency and downsizing.
I know some of you may not agree, but falt rate tax is benifical and should be instituted, soon.
-DSO
Originally posted by Bhadhidar
Flat rate taxation sounds nice, simple and good for all.
But.
Is it really fair?
No!
Let's say that we set a flat tax rate of 10% of income, no exemptions, no deductions, No Loopholes!
Now let's say that I make $300,000 a year, and you make $30,000 per year. I'd have to pay $30,000 dollars in tax; you'd pay only $3,000.
You're smiling, I can tell!
OK, now lets say we both have to pay our own health care insurance out of pocket: you, because you don't belong to a union that provides for an HMO, me because I own the company that you work for (Guess who won't let the union organize MY workers?)
Let's say we both pay the same amount per month in HMO premiums: $300. That works out to $3600 per year for health insurance.
But that leaves you, and your family just $23,400 to live on. I've still got $266,400!
And consider, we both still pay the same for gas, food, and all the other needs and wants in life. Rich or poor, milk is still a buck fifty a gallon at the grocery store.
Originally posted by backtoreality
They should really explain this better when you get ready to graduate from college. It would have been nice to know that all your hard work in life up to this point will be penalized and a larger portion of your earnings will be taken away to give to the people who made the wrong decisions in life.
Originally posted by Two Steps Forward
welfare payments constitute only the tiniest, tiniest fraction of the outlays your taxes go for.
Originally posted by backtoreality
Interesting...no where in my above post did I promote the idea of a Flat Rate Tax.
my rant was on the absurdity of this one aspect of the overall system in which monies are taken away from the hardworking and given to the--not so hardworking.
p.s. glad to see your usage of the word 'silly'; it's been a while.
Originally posted by dbates
Originally posted by Two Steps Forward
welfare payments constitute only the tiniest, tiniest fraction of the outlays your taxes go for.
A small infraction on my earnings is still an infraction on my earnings. I suppose you never accept coins as change after a purchase, since this would only be a a tiny fraction of your total spending? You just leave that 58 cents on the check-out stand for the next guy that needs it more right?