posted on May, 31 2006 @ 01:19 PM
This is the original picture taken by the Viking I. The image posted initially looks entirely separate to me. Closer up and a different
angle. I also know that infrared scans have been done of the entire Cydonia region and other outlying areas of the Mars surface. The image shown
here is the only one I have seen that portrays heat from the face, but that doesn't mean that the photo was manufactured. Honesty, there has been
some serious controversy whether or not the photos originally released by NASA and THEMIS are unaltered to begin with. Who can say which images are
real and which are not? As for the volcano issue, recent studies have shown that there have indeed been
active volcanoes on the Mars surface,
and even more interesting, is that it could have been as early as 2 million years ago. Geologically speaking, that is nothing. Alan Moorhouse is a
European space exploration scientists that believes he may be onto something that will change the modern conception of the Red Planet. He thinks that
there may indeed be active volcanoes still on Mars, which would actually account for a heat signature coming from the Mars face. Here is that
link:
Geological activity
on Mars
As far as the face is concerned, this would actually explain quite a bit. If we step aside of the "face" theory itself for a moment, and simply
look at the mountain for what it is, the odd formations and valleys seem to coicide with the appearance of volcanoes on Earth that have erupted in the
past several thousand years. Take a look at recent images that Byrd has suggested, which when viewed from separate angles, don't actually resemble a
face, but more an eroded mass of irregular land and rolling hills. When viewed from this perspective, the concept of the face on Mars being a volcano
is not that far-fetched after all.