It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RaiderJose
I think its about time that they bring out something new. I don't know why the do no,t budget mabe?
frosty
NASA should scrap all manned missions into space until a reason to go into space can be achieved and planned to carry out.
While no scientist can deny the value of robotic space exploration, many feel the need for complementary manned programs. Most agree that, for basic survey missions, robotic probes produce dramatic results. It’s in field study that scientist crewed missions could do better. Ironically, it is the same people who run the unmanned space missions that are clamoring for human crewed missions to follow them up.
Part of the problem is the limited abilities and scope of each robotic mission. To save money and reduce failure rates to a minimum, robotic probes are stripped down to essentials. Although these probes gather important data, much of it is ambiguous for lack of the probe’s ability to do follow up tests. Today’s robots cannot start up new lines of investigation.
/snip
Crewed missions are more costly, but also more effective. Human calibrated experiments setup up on the moon by Apollo missions functioned perfectly for 8 years until shut down for fiscal reasons in 1977. Robotic missions, while they may carry similar instruments, are incredibly difficult to place and calibrate. Ruggedness wins over accuracy so instruments are less sensitive and deliver fewer details in the data they collect.
/snip
Geologists make up the most vocal group of proponents for manned missions. While probe data is useful, they contend one mission with a live geologist could answer all their questions in a few weeks, while endless robotic probes may never be able to provide a clear picture of Mars.
Outsource to the private sector. Its the only way to progress in leaps and bounds.
Originally posted by StellarX
Looks like NASA allready decided on plan B ( or is this plan A?) and their starting to buy equipment from the right source this time.
NASA to buy 4 spacecraft in Russia
Stellar
Originally posted by sardion2000Frosty there are many many reasons(from learning to live efficiently with scarce resources to learning how to mine the moon) which you continually either ignore or brush off as fantasy for one reason or another. I'm sure glad people like you are in the minority(on this issue alone). And your arguments against it don't seem to be swaying anyone so I don't know why you keep harping the same tune.
Originally posted by Murcielago
The Soyuz is for people only...Not large ISS components.
Originally posted by Frosty
Hundreds of millions of people in this world survive on scarce resources. There is no need to go into space or land on a moon to see if it can be done.
There is no reason to send people into space for any scientific purpose, it is simply a coolness factor.
Think about it. What can a human do that a robot or a camera cannot? Honestly?
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by Murcielago
The Soyuz is for people only...Not large ISS components.
It's far more than just that....