It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NR
Look, even Russia didnt care about what we said, curropt zionist regime should come to an end. Story
Originally posted by WestPoint23
So NR you think that Israel has no reason to be upset over such comments?
What would the Iranian leaders think if the US stated that its policy is the complete destruction of Iran, or that Iran should be wiped of the map? I bet people wouldn't like it too much.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
So NR you think that Israel has no reason to be upset over such comments?
What would the Iranian leaders think if the US stated that its policy is the complete destruction of Iran, or that Iran should be wiped of the map? I bet people wouldn't like it too much.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
"The stated US policy is that if any terror group attacks US citizens on US soil the US would respond by using nuclear bombs on Iran, this is even if the group has nothing to do with Iran. Sounds like the US already has stated that they want Iran wiped off the map and yet Iran didnt call for it to be kicked off the UN."
Sep, could you please present your documentation to that? And if you do, please try to present the whole thing, not just take something out of context.
You see, the reason I want to see that is terrorists have killed US citizens on US soil-can you say 9/11. BTW, you do realize that was the second time they tried to take one of the buildings. and since the US has yet to nuke Iran-hmmmm
JERUSALEM — Israel will consider "all options" to prevent Iran from producing nuclear weapons, Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz said in an interview published Wednesday, marking the latest in a series of Israeli threats against Iran's nuclear program.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Sep, could you please present your documentation to that? And if you do, please try to present the whole thing, not just take something out of context.
Originally posted by Sep
And this is the quote i am refering to:
The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by 27jd
Research "tactical nuclear weapons", they're not the same animal as the mammoth nukes people automatically think of when nuclear weapons are mentioned. There's a huge difference.
Originally posted by Sep
So would it be completely all right with you if Iran attacked the US in a first and unprovoked strike using "tactical nuclear weapons" or threatened to wipe Israel off the map using "tactical nuclear weapons"?