It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ivanglam
Out of all the Believers of Religion here (any), how many of you can actually prove that A God exists?
Please keep comments to a Minimum of 5 Lines worth.
Lets also keep it neat and tidy; please follow this guideline
LMAO
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
There is no way to prove God exists or doesn't exist.
Originally posted by mr conspiracy
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
There is no way to prove God exists or doesn't exist.
There is a way. God himself can prove it.
---
Originally posted by genuineninja
People, you'll find it just as hard to disprove the existence of god, a higher power, whatever you chose to call it, as christians and religious folk will find it to prove the existence of god, thats why its called "faith"!!
Originally posted by mr conspiracy
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
There is no way to prove God exists or doesn't exist.
There is a way. God himself can prove it.
Originally posted by japike
Sorry I broke the 5 line limit but if anyone can challenge my statement I will
Originally posted by ivanglam
There are two ways the Universe could have been created:
1. A Infinate Chan of Causeality, or
2. God
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by ivanglam
There are two ways the Universe could have been created:
1. A Infinate Chan of Causeality, or
2. God
This is an assumption. Any 'proof' based on an assumption isn't proof at all.
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
There is no way to prove God exists or doesn't exist.
Originally posted by ivanglam
How is it an assumption. What other ways could we all 'be' ?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by ivanglam
How is it an assumption. What other ways could we all 'be' ?
I don't know. But if you're talking proof, in a scientific way, you need to prove every step of the theory. What you're doing here is assumption of a false theory. Not necessarily that it's false, it just hasn't been proven as true. You can't use something unproven as a basis for a scientific theory.
We may discover something in the future that adds a 4th, 5th or 6th way that we could have come about.
An assumption is something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof. Like when people thought the earth was flat, they thought they could prove it. When they tried to prove it by sailing off to the edge, they actually disproved it. They worked on an assumption that the earth is flat.
Maybe you're not speaking in scientific terms, but it sounds like it to me, what with all the talk of infinite chains of causality and all.
Don't get me wrong. I don't have any problems with anyone believing in God, but God's existence is a belief, not a fact. I have beliefs, too. I don't try to prove them to anyone. I can't. They're beliefs.
Originally posted by ivanglam
What do you believe in?
Originally posted by ivanglam
LOL - Just the replies I expected.
So A caused B right? Seems logical. The begining caused the inbetween days. Well, what cause A? Ohh, thats right. D did. But wait didnt you say that A was the FIRST? So what started the Cycle?
Selecting any one point as the starting point would render this Chain inaccurate. It would then have a Starting point and would no longer be infinate.
That starting point, we call God.
If infinate chains cannot exist in space and time, then God is the only option. Some, I bet are still skeptical. But I am not asking you to believe what the christians, islamics, or hindu's (arguably) believe, I am simply asking that you accept the undenyable thruth that there is A GOD, and that it IS PROVEABLE.
Happy Digestion of the Information.
To the Believers - Never let anyone convince you otherwise; there is a God
To the Non-Believers - Theres the PROOF, logically presented, to show A God DOES exist.
Deny Ignorance.