It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
PHILADELPHIA, Sept. 22, 2005 – The U.S. Army has awarded Boeing (NYSE: BA) two contracts to perform conceptual design and analysis of vertical-takeoff-and-landing concepts for the Joint Heavy Lift (JHL) program.
One contract, worth $ 3.4 million, goes to Boeing Phantom Works for its Advanced Tandem Rotor Helicopter (ATRH). Boeing proposed the ATRH in the Army’s low-speed category, which is for vehicles that fly between 160 and 200 knots.
The other contract, worth $3.45 million, goes to the team of Bell Helicopter, a Textron company (NYSE: TXT), and Boeing Phantom Works for the QuadTiltrotor (QTR) aircraft, which was entered in the high-speed category of 250 knots or more.
Originally posted by CrazyOrange
Wouldn't the first rotors cut the wind so that it apply's unwanted forces on the second ones? Wouldn't want to be the guy that has to calculate that stuff and then adjust the software/hardware so it's neglible.
Originally posted by xmotex
I think the speed and range advantages of the QTR will win out in the end.
A lot of the technological problems and operational problems associated with tiltrotors have been worked out during the Osprey's development process.
And if you think the Osprey has killed too many Marines, take a look at the safety record of the CH-46 - not exactly confidence inspiring.
Originally posted by Murcielago
Originally posted by xmotex
I think the speed and range advantages of the QTR will win out in the end.
A lot of the technological problems and operational problems associated with tiltrotors have been worked out during the Osprey's development process.
And if you think the Osprey has killed too many Marines, take a look at the safety record of the CH-46 - not exactly confidence inspiring.
I agree on its record, Helicopters just arn't as safe as planes...people often forget that.
However I dissagree with you on which one will win out...Money is tight, so thats why i'm going with the Chinook, although I like the Quad tilt-rotor design better.
I just dont think the Arny can afford it with there whole FCS program and all.
The main problem with the V-22 was the hydraulic lines. They used very high-pressure lines which kept bursting.
Originally posted by xmotex
I think the speed and range advantages of the QTR will win out in the end.
A lot of the technological problems and operational problems associated with tiltrotors have been worked out during the Osprey's development process.
And if you think the Osprey has killed too many Marines, take a look at the safety record of the CH-46 - not exactly confidence inspiring.