It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Loungerist
The Philadelphia Experiement has always intrigued me but the time travel aspects make me suspicious of some of the claims about it. I can't see how time travel could be possible and have never seen anything resembling a plausible hypothesis for it. Time relativity as a science could yield some interesting results perhaps,but actual time travel? Can't see it. The consequences of any movement backwards or forward through time would destroy reality as far as I can speculate.
Originally posted by Zeta_101
Originally posted by Loungerist
The Philadelphia Experiement has always intrigued me but the time travel aspects make me suspicious of some of the claims about it. I can't see how time travel could be possible and have never seen anything resembling a plausible hypothesis for it. Time relativity as a science could yield some interesting results perhaps,but actual time travel? Can't see it. The consequences of any movement backwards or forward through time would destroy reality as far as I can speculate.
Actually, according to Einstein's general theory of relativity, there is nothing in the laws of physics to prevent it. Time trave,l therefore, IS possible, but just very hard to achieve. You need the technology to create wormholes not only through space but time.
Just because something's out of reach at the moment doesn't mean it's impossible
We'll get there...eventually.
Originally posted by Rasputin13
I was under the impression that the Philadelphia Experiment was conducted in order to make the battleship invisible, not to travel in time. The time travel and the ship appearing in another port, and all the horrible side-effects were just that... side effects. Am I wrong in this thinking?
Originally posted by klain
Originally posted by Rasputin13
I was under the impression that the Philadelphia Experiment was conducted in order to make the battleship invisible, not to travel in time. The time travel and the ship appearing in another port, and all the horrible side-effects were just that... side effects. Am I wrong in this thinking?
i was commissioned for this yes but thats what supposedly happened its really quite interesting
Originally posted by IronMan
I think if you're going to build a time machine, it won't be heavily composed with
metals and electricity.
The only reference of passing time is the awareness of it in your mind. I believe
that the first time machine will be built like a brain! a mechanism that can not
only register, but realise passing time.
I know this may seem radical, but think of it... time only passes in your life.
I know some may say "what about clocks?" but, that's a contraption that
measures a time that's man-made.
Originally posted by klain
Originally posted by IronMan
I think if you're going to build a time machine, it won't be heavily composed with
metals and electricity.
The only reference of passing time is the awareness of it in your mind. I believe
that the first time machine will be built like a brain! a mechanism that can not
only register, but realise passing time.
I know this may seem radical, but think of it... time only passes in your life.
I know some may say "what about clocks?" but, that's a contraption that
measures a time that's man-made.
i watched a brilliant sci-fi movie once where a man trained his brain by hypnosis to go back in time who knows what are brain is capable of
kind of a bad example but there you go