Judge Postpones Trump Classified Docs Trial INDEFINITELY

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Trump had the documents, which he should not have in his private possession "

By the way , It has been Confirmed in Court that the National Archives sent those Alleged TS Documents to his Mar Lago Home after he Left Office . He Did Not Take Any of them with him .

As Trump departed the White House, aides rushed to pack documents

Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago?

to set him up? Or do you think Trump packed his own boxes?

There's video of Trump's munchkins removing about 24 boxes of documents from the White House on January 20.

One or two boxes, which may have inadvertently contained classified documents, might be reasonable for someone who leaves a job after four years, but the number was too far 'over the top' for Trump to be able to deny it.

I also don't think Trump did anything that he could delegate. He was far too busy with himself.

let's see this video.

I have seen video of staff moving boxes out of the white house into black SUV's and a truck allegedly on January 20. I can't seem to find that video now, perhaps it is sub-judice evidence?

I have seen that video.

a reply to: Annee

Do you know with Absolute Certainty what was In those Boxes ? Talk about being Gullible............

a reply to: chr0naut

All useless as real evidence. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
a reply to: CarlLaFong

Long after Trump left office...and while the case against him was being set up...

FEDS contact Trump saying we have these additional 6 pallets of stuff you need to pick up.

FOUR of them you can store anywhere.
TWO of these pallets contain documents that Feds (FBI) say MUST go to Mar-a-Lago.

Feds say they are all stored at some storage facility in Virginia and Trump needs to get them NOW.
There is no chain of custody to these pallets. No idea who beyond the FBI/GSA/NARA had access to them during storage.

Trump follows their orders and has them picked up.

It turns out that the two pallets of documents ordered to be taken to Mar-a-Lago by an FBI agent...contained the classified documents that Jack Smith was later proven to have tampered with.

There is no doubt we have set up here.

The GSA pallets contained furniture, office equipment and office supplies. Not official documents.

Read the whole evidence trail/e-mails etc, (as a PDF). The only mention of documents anywhere in it is, "Meet with Leasing POCs to review necessary documents to identify potential office locations."

Outgoing POTUS -- Signed MOU + Transition e-mails and forms.

Also check the dates.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

Do you know with Absolute Certainty what was In those Boxes ? Talk about being Gullible............

Do you know what an excuse is?

Five of the brightest legal and political minds MSNBC could find, got together yesterday...

They are very angry because Joe Biden stinks, Democrats started their "Arrest Trump" processes too late, and Democrats in general are looking so stupid...with Donald Trump promising to make them pay for trying to take him down.

WATCH THIS SEGMENT FROM MSNBC: www.msnbc.com...

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee

Do you know with Absolute Certainty what was In those Boxes ? Talk about being Gullible............

Do you know what an excuse is?

I am Looking at one .

a reply to: chr0naut

" Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago? "


I don't know . Try asking the DOJ or the Biden Mafia .

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago? "

I don't know . Try asking the DOJ or the Biden Mafia .

Here's a concept for you:

The National Archives did not transfer any classified documents to Mar a Lago after 20 January! Neither did the GSA!

The right-wing media have been trying to insinuate that the 2 pallets of boxes that were sent to Mar a Lago were pallets of documents - they weren't, they were office supplies and furniture.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago? "

I don't know . Try asking the DOJ or the Biden Mafia .

Here's a concept for you:

The National Archives did not transfer any classified documents to Mar a Lago after 20 January! Neither did the GSA!

The right-wing media have been trying to insinuate that the 2 pallets of boxes that were sent to Mar a Lago were pallets of documents - they weren't, they were office supplies and furniture.

Here’s a concept for you:

Spoliation of Evidence
The intentional or negligent alteration, hiding, withholding or destruction of pieces of evidence relevant to a trial by a party connected to the case.
Not only is it a federal crime, it also risks disbarment, sanctions, and lawsuits.

The special counsel not only admitted to it in their filing, they also admitted to lying about it stating the situation is “inconsistent with what Government counsel previously understood and represented to the Court.”

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago? "

I don't know . Try asking the DOJ or the Biden Mafia .

Here's a concept for you:

The National Archives did not transfer any classified documents to Mar a Lago after 20 January! Neither did the GSA!

The right-wing media have been trying to insinuate that the 2 pallets of boxes that were sent to Mar a Lago were pallets of documents - they weren't, they were office supplies and furniture.

Here’s a concept for you:

Spoliation of Evidence
The intentional or negligent alteration, hiding, withholding or destruction of pieces of evidence relevant to a trial by a party connected to the case.
Not only is it a federal crime, it also risks disbarment, sanctions, and lawsuits.

The special counsel not only admitted to it in their filing, they also admitted to lying about it stating the situation is “inconsistent with what Government counsel previously understood and represented to the Court.”

Facts mean nothing to him.
Don’t waste your breath.

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago? "

I don't know . Try asking the DOJ or the Biden Mafia .

Here's a concept for you:

The National Archives did not transfer any classified documents to Mar a Lago after 20 January! Neither did the GSA!

The right-wing media have been trying to insinuate that the 2 pallets of boxes that were sent to Mar a Lago were pallets of documents - they weren't, they were office supplies and furniture.

Here’s a concept for you:

Spoliation of Evidence
The intentional or negligent alteration, hiding, withholding or destruction of pieces of evidence relevant to a trial by a party connected to the case.
Not only is it a federal crime, it also risks disbarment, sanctions, and lawsuits.

The special counsel not only admitted to it in their filing, they also admitted to lying about it stating the situation is “inconsistent with what Government counsel previously understood and represented to the Court.”

It would not be legal for the investigators to photograph classified documents, and so the classified documents were kept separately and a cover sheet was shown in their place for the purposes of the photograph (which was for release to those who did not have the security level to view the classified documents).

The photograph/s themselves are not the evidence. The documents are the evidence, (none of which have been lost).

We know exactly which documents Trump was keeping at Mar-a-Lago and which were retrieved by the FBI.

Trump's lawyers have suggested that the order in which the documents were stored is relevant to the case, but the order isn't particularly relevant, nor would the case turn on the order the documents were stored in.

The photograph also does not show the order in which the documents were originally stored, either.

There is, however, no issue at all regarding which documents were illegally retained, nor about Trump's attempts to retain them when reasonable requests and time was given for him to return them.

If there was suggestion of spoliation of evidence, the judge could have thrown the case out, and they haven't.

The judge has given the reason of allowing sufficient discovery when there are so many witnesses called, as as to why the case was deferred.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago? "

I don't know . Try asking the DOJ or the Biden Mafia .

Here's a concept for you:

The National Archives did not transfer any classified documents to Mar a Lago after 20 January! Neither did the GSA!

The right-wing media have been trying to insinuate that the 2 pallets of boxes that were sent to Mar a Lago were pallets of documents - they weren't, they were office supplies and furniture.

You must be an insider...how did you get to know this pertinent info? Links or pics please or you a full of sh#t.

May 10, 2024

I don't comprehend or understand the enormity of the documents about to be unsealed and published by Judge Aileen Cannon, but it's a BIG DEAL according to Conservative media.

See Here: www.thegatewaypundit.com...

Can anyone explain why the referenced Trump-filed motions are such a big deal?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago? "

I don't know . Try asking the DOJ or the Biden Mafia .

Here's a concept for you:

The National Archives did not transfer any classified documents to Mar a Lago after 20 January! Neither did the GSA!

The right-wing media have been trying to insinuate that the 2 pallets of boxes that were sent to Mar a Lago were pallets of documents - they weren't, they were office supplies and furniture.

What are we to believe after the left…

Falsely accused Brent Kavanaugh with slander during senate hearings?

The lefts lie of Trump Russian Collusion.

The lefts and the intelligence agencies willingness to buy false Russian information to use illegal fisa warrants to spy on a campaign and falsify interview documents.

After Biden and Hillary get a pass after blatantly breaking laws regarding classified material.

Now it’s known the FBI staged and tampered with evidence relating to Trump to create a circus / sideshow.

Who’s a security threat, and a threat to democracy?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

a reply to: chr0naut

Legally there's no way to distinguish proof of what was there before the "raid" and what was brought in with the "raid".

And yeah, pallets were stored in a Virginia unsecured warehouse and later shipped unsecured to Mar-A-Lago 😀

Legally at this point there's no way to distinguish and prove anything 😃

The dozens of detailed motions before the Court now will end up getting the case dismissed.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: chr0naut
- That injecting bleach might also be effective against COVID-19.

^^ This one always gets me. No. He did not say that. He expressed interest in exploring whether disinfectants could be applied to the site of a coronavirus infection inside the body, such as the lungs.

Nope, he clearly said injection:

Ultraviolet light treatments introduced into the tracheas of five critically ill COVID-19 patients appeared to be safe and associated with a reduction in the respiratory load of SARS-CoV-2—the virus responsible for COVID-19—in all but one patient, according to a study conducted by Cedars-Sinai.

The findings, published in the peer-reviewed journal Advances in Therapy, were based on five days of 20-minute treatments with ultraviolet A (UVA) light using a catheter inserted into the patients' tracheas. Patients were followed for 30 days. The findings were based on four patients; the fifth patient had no detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 at the study outset.

here it is

You just proved it, Trump never said bleach he said disinfectant, which is what the UV light being inserted or injected into the body was doing working as a disifectant. You see how easily manipulated those suffering from TDS really are. Just like the Charlottesville quote. It's really shameful how the msm and the political establishment along with the intelligence community work together to propagandize our citizens.

Sanitizing wands allow you to wave UVC light over anything you might want to disinfect

UV lights injected in the body to disenfect

UV light to disinfect things, such as self-cleaning UV light water bottles and UV-emitting cases that clean your dirty phone. 

here is more

a reply to: fringeofthefringe

You're wasting your time. Several times I've told myself to stop responding to his posts, then I get sucked back in by the monumental stupidity.
Never again.

I mean it this time

originally posted by: Vermilion
Spoliation of Evidence
The intentional or negligent alteration, hiding, withholding or destruction of pieces of evidence relevant to a trial by a party connected to the case.
Not only is it a federal crime, it also risks disbarment, sanctions, and lawsuits.

The special counsel not only admitted to it in their filing, they also admitted to lying about it stating the situation is “inconsistent with what Government counsel previously understood and represented to the Court.”

That right there should be the end of the discussion. You can't argue against facts. But yet....

We clearly see there are people out there who consistently try to argue against the facts. Maybe they caught TDS somewhere and maybe it inhibits the intelligence receptors in their brain. Or maybe it enhances their idioticy receptors. Some affliction has definitely befallen them. They seem to be blinded to the truth.

The facts are, the judge in this case has postponed this trial indefinitely. Why do these same people never criticize all the other judges presiding over the cases against Donald Trump? It's because there is a (D)ifference. Can you guess what that difference is?

Edited to add this very relevant addition:
Since these blind-to-the-truth people are infiltrating just about every topic, that makes my comment appropriate for this thread and every other thread they continually try to derail.