Meet the Guerrilla Skeptics, the "fact checkers" rewriting thousands of UFO wikipedia articles

a reply to: kwaka

NASA and other scientists researching this UAP/UFO phenomenon continue to state that there is no evidence of extraterrestrial craft or aliens, so maybe they know something we don't know?

As for Wikipedia, just watching a video on how many of their pages are continuously vandalized and were changed by anyone that had nothing to do that day. Pause and read at mark 4:02.

The 'Guerrilla' Wikipedia Editors Who Combat Conspiracy Theories

Susan Gerbic's team of over 100 editors are responsible for some of Wikipedia’s most trafficked pages about UFOs and other pseudoscience.

www.wired.com...

a reply to: quintessentone

NASA and other scientists researching this UAP/UFO phenomenon continue to state that there is no evidence of extraterrestrial craft or aliens, so maybe they know something we don't know?

Maybe they do. As political pressure continues to build around disclosure, some are seeing problems they need some backup on. While this topic is compartmentalized in such a way, resources and capability is limited in how the human collective can respond to threats. With most blind to it all, looks like sheep to the slaughter when it is time.

Maybe those in the government involved with such matter are caught in fear or already captured by some greater intelligence many steps ahead of the average human. The global consolidation around the WHO pandemic treaty going on does make it easy for some kind of alien invasion to capture this planet. Get us to do most of the hard work.

a reply to: kwaka

What hard work? Mining for gold? Digging ditches?

We have AI and robots to do the hard work - even drones are reforesting our planet at a higher seed rate than we ever could.

The hard work will be for humanity to change from their warring and destructive ways.

I could be wrong, then again I could be right.

a reply to: quintessentone

What hard work?

A single legal instrument than can force every government around the world to implement its policy. With the ineffective and harmful policies pushed globally with covid by the corporate world that time, next time can bring in the jack boots rather than just the dollars to enforce arbitrary mandates.

That is if this WHO pandemic treaty coming up gets enough votes. If it passes, the WHO governing body can and will change the fine print without a consensus of nations to get this treaty started.

originally posted by: kwaka
a reply to: quintessentone

What hard work?

A single legal instrument than can force every government around the world to implement its policy. With the ineffective and harmful policies pushed globally with covid by the corporate world that time, next time can bring in the jack boots rather than just the dollars to enforce arbitrary mandates.

That is if this WHO pandemic treaty coming up gets enough votes. If it passes, the WHO governing body can and will change the fine print without a consensus of nations to get this treaty started.

So far those that have been looking to the skies for evidence of extraterrestrials have said there are none, including astronomers who's eyes are always on the sky and the heavens. So could they arrive in a different state of being/matter than what we are capable of knowing? Yes, then again they probably are right now and are leaving us to our never-ending warring and destructive ways.

Does that explanation alleviate your worry of world domination by aliens? I keep wondering if aliens did do an 'intervention' here that we'd finally be able to reach our full potential as an intelligent and peaceful species within the universe because that's how I know who and what they are really about, but we are off topic.

a reply to: quintessentone

Does that explanation alleviate your worry of world domination by aliens? Not me...

Strange we can agree on something. Whatever the situation is, looks diverse and complex. We ain't dead yet, hope to keep it that way.

a reply to: arcticshuffle

In 1953, its said Eienhower met with aliens, but its also said aliens dont talk to the president as his job is only temporary.

Also in 1953, a young Princess Elizabeth was coronated as queen, not a temporary role.

If you want a rabbithole, look into Princess Margret's death.

ALSO Kate Middleton was shot in the abdomen because she is an evil POS, and is nolonger taking "royal duties".

originally posted by: kwaka
a reply to: quintessentone

Does that explanation alleviate your worry of world domination by aliens? Not me...

Strange we can agree on something. Whatever the situation is, looks diverse and complex. We ain't dead yet, hope to keep it that way.

It's not strange when two people try to understand each others' stances within this anonymous type sometimes angry bird forum where the human physical element, such as reading someone's facial expressions, is non-existent.

There is an editing war going on behind the scenes within Wikipedia.

How do they manage the facts when the truth or reality is realized differently by two opposite sides?

originally posted by: BeTheGoddess2
a reply to: arcticshuffle

In 1953, its said Eienhower met with aliens, but its also said aliens dont talk to the president as his job is only temporary.

Also in 1953, a young Princess Elizabeth was coronated as queen, not a temporary role.

If you want a rabbithole, look into Princess Margret's death.

ALSO Kate Middleton was shot in the abdomen because she is an evil POS, and is nolonger taking "royal duties".

Someone shot Kate Middleton ?
Man, I need to start paying attention.