Myocarditis or Pericarditis Study In Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

Repeating all of the big words you know like a broken record doesn't make you sound intelligent.

Sure. I defend pharmaceuticals. They have saved the lives of my loved ones, and I take 2 daily pills that allow me to live a normal life.

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals.
Thanks for your admission. At least you are honest.
As I said there are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

And I am correct for once more.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Inflammation is of this type is typically caused by the body's reaction to a viral infection. No more virus, no more inflamation.

Inflammation is of this type is typically caused by the body's reaction to a viral infection OR a foreign spike protein that acts like a virus?

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Inflammation is of this type is typically caused by the body's reaction to a viral infection. No more virus, no more inflamation.

Inflammation is of this type is typically caused by the body's reaction to a viral infection OR a foreign spike protein that acts like a virus?

He has conveniently ignited or forgotten this basic fact and the new peer reviewed publications showing clearly that post vaccination the major factor of pathogenesis is the free spike protein that can travel everywhere in the body and affect many organs.

a reply to: Kenzo

Thoughts and prayers for the vaxxed.

a reply to: Dutchowl


Yes, that's what we should do. Many were not informed, and simple made mistake believing wrong people/ authority.

originally posted by: Dutchowl
Thoughts and prayers for the vaxxed.

No thank you.

a reply to: LordAhriman


Atheist ?

a reply to: Kenzo

I mean honestly who could have predicated that compliance to one of the most corrupt big pharma companies and their experimental drug could lead to consequences... beyond any sane, critically thinking individual.

originally posted by: Antisocialist
a reply to: chr0naut

I don't care to debate my posts. You accept or reject it. Either way, I don't care.

Fair enough, if I only have the two options, I reject your post on account of the bits that I disagree with.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Antisocialist
a reply to: chr0naut

I don't care to debate my posts. You accept or reject it. Either way, I don't care.

Fair enough, if I only have the two options, I reject your post on account of the bits that I disagree with.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

Repeating all of the big words you know like a broken record doesn't make you sound intelligent.

Sure. I defend pharmaceuticals. They have saved the lives of my loved ones, and I take 2 daily pills that allow me to live a normal life.

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals.
Thanks for your admission. At least you are honest.
As I said there are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

And I am correct for once more.

I also am in favor of pharmaceuticals. Even ancient and traditional medicines are highly dependent upon them.

Would you rather treat diseases with shamanism, aromatherapy, reiki, or placebo's? Imagine that at a car crash...

a reply to: chr0naut

Whoever is doing a depopulation event has to be sure to survive it themselves. Stealth is the name of the game. Since the finger is pointing at the rich who wish to remain that way. Something has stuffed up. Because if I were going to cull the heart. I would do what nature does and kill off the useless eaters as they wouldn't be missed and their death would contribute to the economy. But what is happening is that the main contributors to the economy are dying. Plus the injured are taking up a lot of resources. But the main thrust would be to stop the breeders, anyone got any real birth stats because that's the one to watch out for.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

Whoever is doing a depopulation event has to be sure to survive it themselves. Stealth is the name of the game. Since the finger is pointing at the rich who wish to remain that way. Something has stuffed up. Because if I were going to cull the heart. I would do what nature does and kill off the useless eaters as they wouldn't be missed and their death would contribute to the economy. But what is happening is that the main contributors to the economy are dying. Plus the injured are taking up a lot of resources. But the main thrust would be to stop the breeders, anyone got any real birth stats because that's the one to watch out for.

Or, quite possibly, the idea that we are being culled (in the face of the fact that we just aren't) is absurd?

And, if someone wanted to be really (invisibly) subtle, all they would have to do is wait...

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

Repeating all of the big words you know like a broken record doesn't make you sound intelligent.

Sure. I defend pharmaceuticals. They have saved the lives of my loved ones, and I take 2 daily pills that allow me to live a normal life.

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals.
Thanks for your admission. At least you are honest.
As I said there are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

And I am correct for once more.

I also am in favor of pharmaceuticals. Even ancient and traditional medicines are highly dependent upon them.

Would you rather treat diseases with shamanism, aromatherapy, reiki, or placebo's? Imagine that at a car crash...

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals! At least you are honest. There was another member who said exactly the same thing yesterday I think. He also claimed that the pharmaceuticals have saved millions of lives. Which is as bad as it gets for an argument but not the point of this conversation.

You may want to have a look at my thread

Pfizer: Six scandals to remember.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

Repeating all of the big words you know like a broken record doesn't make you sound intelligent.

Sure. I defend pharmaceuticals. They have saved the lives of my loved ones, and I take 2 daily pills that allow me to live a normal life.

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals.
Thanks for your admission. At least you are honest.
As I said there are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

And I am correct for once more.

I also am in favor of pharmaceuticals. Even ancient and traditional medicines are highly dependent upon them.

Would you rather treat diseases with shamanism, aromatherapy, reiki, or placebo's? Imagine that at a car crash...

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals! At least you are honest. There was another member who said exactly the same thing yesterday I think. He also claimed that the pharmaceuticals have saved millions of lives. Which is as bad as it gets for an argument but not the point of this conversation.

You may want to have a look at my thread

Pfizer: Six scandals to remember.

Pfizer supplies about 314 drugs in the US. 6 were bad.

One can easily target any company for its negatives and failures, but a balanced view would be to consider them in light of its positives and successes, too.

Cardiovascular disease is the number one killer in the US, and the primary cause of that is not medicines, it is diet.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

Repeating all of the big words you know like a broken record doesn't make you sound intelligent.

Sure. I defend pharmaceuticals. They have saved the lives of my loved ones, and I take 2 daily pills that allow me to live a normal life.

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals.
Thanks for your admission. At least you are honest.
As I said there are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

And I am correct for once more.

I also am in favor of pharmaceuticals. Even ancient and traditional medicines are highly dependent upon them.

Would you rather treat diseases with shamanism, aromatherapy, reiki, or placebo's? Imagine that at a car crash...

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals! At least you are honest. There was another member who said exactly the same thing yesterday I think. He also claimed that the pharmaceuticals have saved millions of lives. Which is as bad as it gets for an argument but not the point of this conversation.

You may want to have a look at my thread

Pfizer: Six scandals to remember.

Pfizer supplies about 314 drugs in the US. 6 were bad.

One can easily target any company for its negatives and failures, but a balanced view would be to consider them in light of its positives and successes, too.

Cardiovascular disease is the number one killer in the US, and the primary cause of that is not medicines, it is diet.

I think we don't need around here vaccine apology and denialism or defending of the pharmaceuticals. Perhaps you should preach this dogma somewhere else.

In terms of heart related conditions caused by the mRNA products, it is worth looking around as this is a real epidemic. Also take a look at excess non Covid deaths that are recorded everywhere in the world. It's definitely not climate change or the Republicans...

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

Repeating all of the big words you know like a broken record doesn't make you sound intelligent.

Sure. I defend pharmaceuticals. They have saved the lives of my loved ones, and I take 2 daily pills that allow me to live a normal life.

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals.
Thanks for your admission. At least you are honest.
As I said there are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

And I am correct for once more.

I also am in favor of pharmaceuticals. Even ancient and traditional medicines are highly dependent upon them.

Would you rather treat diseases with shamanism, aromatherapy, reiki, or placebo's? Imagine that at a car crash...

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals! At least you are honest. There was another member who said exactly the same thing yesterday I think. He also claimed that the pharmaceuticals have saved millions of lives. Which is as bad as it gets for an argument but not the point of this conversation.

You may want to have a look at my thread

Pfizer: Six scandals to remember.

Pfizer supplies about 314 drugs in the US. 6 were bad.

One can easily target any company for its negatives and failures, but a balanced view would be to consider them in light of its positives and successes, too.

Cardiovascular disease is the number one killer in the US, and the primary cause of that is not medicines, it is diet.

One can "easily target" the failures. Yeah like using 3rd world children as guinea pigs and KNOWINGLY killing people, paying off doctors and faking trial results.

Actually one can EASILY predict future behavior based on past behavior.

And what you can do is be an apologist for every atrocity they commit. Good work.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

Repeating all of the big words you know like a broken record doesn't make you sound intelligent.

Sure. I defend pharmaceuticals. They have saved the lives of my loved ones, and I take 2 daily pills that allow me to live a normal life.

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals.
Thanks for your admission. At least you are honest.
As I said there are some members who will argue points that have been repeatedly refuted. They are engaging in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality as well as defending the pharmaceuticals.

And I am correct for once more.

I also am in favor of pharmaceuticals. Even ancient and traditional medicines are highly dependent upon them.

Would you rather treat diseases with shamanism, aromatherapy, reiki, or placebo's? Imagine that at a car crash...

So you are defending the pharmaceuticals! At least you are honest. There was another member who said exactly the same thing yesterday I think. He also claimed that the pharmaceuticals have saved millions of lives. Which is as bad as it gets for an argument but not the point of this conversation.

You may want to have a look at my thread

Pfizer: Six scandals to remember.

Pfizer supplies about 314 drugs in the US. 6 were bad.

One can easily target any company for its negatives and failures, but a balanced view would be to consider them in light of its positives and successes, too.

Cardiovascular disease is the number one killer in the US, and the primary cause of that is not medicines, it is diet.

One can "easily target" the failures. Yeah like using 3rd world children as guinea pigs and KNOWINGLY killing people, paying off doctors and faking trial results.

Actually one can EASILY predict future behavior based on past behavior.

And what you can do is be an apologist for every atrocity they commit. Good work.

So, how many of those who died as a result of not taking any precautions against COVID-19, or of an infection from someone who took no precautions, could we allocate to you?

At least those who took precautions may have avoided the worst of the symptoms. Not so those who did nothing.

a reply to: chr0naut

I caught covid from the only fully vaxed employee in my workplace..... ironically he was down for a week. For me it was one day only...

originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: chr0naut

I caught covid from the only fully vaxed employee in my workplace..... ironically he was down for a week. For me it was one day only...

How lucky you are. Most people get the worst symptoms on day 3 and by day 5 they are over it. Unfortunately, my wife was hospitalized, but was over it by day 5. My bout with COVID was quite mild but took a week and a half.

As to who was the source in our case, I have no idea. It affected my grandson first and he got it from school, but my wife is a teacher and tested positive a day after him.