“Ethically Unjustifiable” Harvard & Johns Hopkins Found Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than the Virus

Let's be honest, the covid vaccines were not tested correctly, the Companies providing them are shielded from being sued for adverse effects. Who would take any more of these things unless it was absolutely necessary? Finally we have a study with some actual risk / benefit analysis for young people and it doesn't look too good for the fools that forced this on them.

We REALLY need to be able to sue the manufacturers and the institutions who mandated this "experimental" solution.


“Ethically Unjustifiable” – Scientists from Harvard & Johns Hopkins Found Covid-19 Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than the Virus

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/ethically-unjustifiable-new-harvard-johns-hopkins-study-found-covid-19-vaccines-98-times-worse-disease/

A new pre-print study by nine health experts from major universities showed that the COVID-19 vaccines are 98 times worse than the virus, and mandatory booster vaccination in college is “ethically unjustifiable,”

The study was posted on The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) in September, titled, “COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities.“

It was conducted by nine top scientists from the University of Washington, University of Oxford, University of Toronto, Harvard University – Harvard Medical School, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Johns Hopkins University – Department of Surgery, and others.

Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, researchers conclude that booster regulations may result in more harm than good.

According to the study, for every one COVID hospitalization prevented in previously uninfected young adults, “18 to 98 actual serious adverse events” have been caused.

“Per COVID-19 hospitalization prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities,” the study stated.

Based on public data provided by the CDC, we estimate that approximately 22,000 to 30,000 previous uninfected young adults ages 18–29 years must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one Covid-19 hospitalisation. Given the fact that this estimate does not take into account the protection conferred by prior infection nor a risk-adjustment for comorbidity status this should be considered a conservative and optimistic assessment of benefit.

Our estimate shows that university Covid-19 vaccine mandates are likely to cause net expected harms to young healthy adults—between 18 and 98 serious adverse events requiring hospitalisation and 1373 to 3234 disruptions of daily activities—that is not outweighed by a proportionate public health benefit.

www.scribd.com/document/593779723/COVID-19-Vaccine-Boosters-for-Young-Adults-A-Risk-Benefit-Assessment-and-Five-Ethical-Arguments-against-Mandates-at- Universities

From my point of view, I think there should be a lot of prison terms and not just lawsuits.

Willful negligence causing great bodily harm just for starters.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
From my point of view, I think there should be a lot of prison terms and not just lawsuits.

Willful negligence causing great bodily harm just for starters.

When the drug companies were given a free pass from lawsuits there should should have been a clause stipulating the exception from 'knowingly' causing harm.

If previously criteria had been adhered to with this vaccine, it never would have been rolled out.

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
From my point of view, I think there should be a lot of prison terms and not just lawsuits.

Willful negligence causing great bodily harm just for starters.

When the drug companies were given a free pass from lawsuits there should should have been a clause stipulating the exception from 'knowingly' causing harm.

If previously criteria had been adhered to with this vaccine, it never would have been rolled out.

Even with that clause, I wonder if there are state clauses that squash immunity and can break other clauses from "conditions" for anything under circumstances like that.

a reply to: infolurker

Imagine that.

Who could have possibly known that using poorly trialed experimental therapeutics for a disease that presents no real risk to children would cause them harm and violate medical ethics? How could this possibly be when they've been so honest and transparent?

I doubt the people that have refused to acknowledge the basic logic I've been presenting them with will accept this new cutting-edge science discovery since it's a pre-print. They will refuse to accept that science now shows you can't solve a problem that doesn't exist by using drugs that don't work. Further studies and modeling will be required for them to be convinced, then a taxpayer funded influencer campaign, then it will become accepted under the rules of "The Science".

The authoritarian politicization of science has put us back decades as a society. The pseudointellectuals are now dogmatic sheep. They're all too easily brainwashed by political theater to follow whatever they're told in abject denial of basic scientific principles and their own direct observation. They will ignore anything that doesn't align with their mandated beliefs while decrying those sources as being an agent of whatever boogeyman they're currently supposed to hate.

But, but it can't be true, the government always lies BUT this time they aren't lying.

When are the vaccine cavalry arriving? Surely what the esteemed professor is actually saying is that the vaccine is 98 X better than the virus? We just don’t understand.

a reply to: infolurker

People knew that the governments were talking about depopulation, about CUTTING that is CULLING there population for over a decade before this and yet they still chose to trust the institutions of there corrupt government's and even willingly accepted such things as vaccine mandates in some nation's.

Now people are dropping dead, anything and everything but the vaccine is being blamed.

Soldiers are feinting while performing ceremonial duty's and yes people do that but not healthy soldiers except very rarely yet we are seeing it again and again in the UK during the ceremony's taking place around the Queen's body (it could have several causes but the most likely is heart related such as vaccine induced heart problems.

Young Athletes are dropping dead and why.

Most or indeed likely all of these have had the vaccine.

The facts are being covered up by governments and it seems there are almost no politicians willing to stand up for the people.

Agenda 2030 or whatever it is called today.

a reply to: ARM1968

Don't forget that in terms of side effects which 'interfere with daily activities', the vaccine is [1373 to 3234] times more likely to cause harm for every one hospitalisation which is prevented.

3324 people would have to be given serious side effects which interfere with their daily lives (which could include lifelong chronic pain, seizures or paralysis - all of which are horrendous & certainly 'interfere', in addition to simple, direct suffering) in order to prevent a SINGLE hospitalisation.

Fcsking criminal indeed. Hang the bastards.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
But, but it can't be true, the government always lies BUT this time they aren't lying.

Don't sound so smug, as you well know, because I explained this to you when you posted the exact same study, this actually debunks most of what you've been saying by demonstrating that the harm caused by the vax is absolutely minimal.

approximately 1 in 5,000 young men will have heart palpitations, approximately 1.5K out of 25K will have aches and pains similar to flu (Which is about the same as you'd expect with the flu shot)

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

3324 people would have to be given serious side effects which interfere with their daily lives

That's mild cold and flu like symptoms that you'd take aspirin for.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

3324 people would have to be given serious side effects which interfere with their daily lives

That's mild cold and flu like symptoms that you'd take aspirin for.

Like many people’s experience of covid, then?

a reply to: infolurker

I was talking to a coworker who had an insect sting and had a severe reaction to it. He said he wasn't allergic to stings before but had a large red welt on his arm and had to get OTC medication. He was double, maybe triple vaxxed.
The vaxx screws up your immune system.There was a term for it... cytokine storm.

Moraly unethical...how much did China make on masks? Resperators? All virus related products? How much came back to 'the big guy' and 'crack head'?

originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: infolurker


Soldiers are feinting while performing ceremonial duty's and yes people do that but not healthy soldiers except very rarely yet we are seeing it again and again in the UK during the ceremony's taking place around the Queen's body (it could have several causes but the most likely is heart related such as vaccine induced heart problems.

One of the first things you learn in bootcamp is that anyone can lock their knees, cut off circulation, while standing at attention for hours or any other military formalities. It has absolutely nothing to do with health and happens all the time due to complacency. Attempting to throw that in the Covid/Vax mess is reaching.

Here is the paper in question

From Oxford, Harvard, and John Hopkins no less. People gonna say the same Academia isn't as prestigious if it doesn't agree?

Sorta ridiculous how much searching that took to find an article with the source paper. And a really reputable one at that. Google really likes directing you to favorable studies. "Prevents 94.1% of infections" came up a dozen times before a result with link to the source.

Which says up to 3 cases of mydocarditis for every prevented hospitalization.

One time paranoia wins. This planet lives in perpetual fear of being held accountable after admitting they were wrong.