Help me to understand this ....

If Trump is so guilty then why does 80% of the affidavit need to be redacted ?

The warrant was Completely Legal right ? Biden had no Prior knowledge of the raid right ? Then everything should be transparent , whats the hold up ?

www.foxnews.com...

There is no need for me to write up a massive post it's a simple question , why would the Very Justice department that confidently raided a former president need to redact basically the entire affidavit ?

It's a rhetorical question really , but I'm just tripping over myself to see what people have to say ?

Trump Bad , Trump Guilty but no lets hide all this and wrap it up in a mile of red tape

Because it's all about classified information.

Because it’s classified documents that trump declassified with the Executive Order below that that the DOJ refused to declassify and the DOJ refused an order from the commander in chief. These are the Crossfire Hurricane documents that prove the DOJ collusion with Russia to illegally oust a sitting President. This was the dems “insurrection”. They don’t want those documents to see the light of day and that’s why Trump wants a special master and that’s why trump took the docs with him to prove the illegal surveillance of a person running for office by the opposing party and illegal surveillance of a sitting president


“Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation”

www.federalregister.gov... ation

We don't have secret government, it's quite open. On the other hand everything damning is classified and redacted so they still look legitimate.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

It was classified: look it up.

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
If Trump is so guilty then why does 80% of the affidavit need to be redacted ?

The warrant was Completely Legal right ? Biden had no Prior knowledge of the raid right ? Then everything should be transparent , whats the hold up ?

www.foxnews.com...

There is no need for me to write up a massive post it's a simple question , why would the Very Justice department that confidently raided a former president need to redact basically the entire affidavit ?

It's a rhetorical question really , but I'm just tripping over myself to see what people have to say ?

Trump Bad , Trump Guilty but no lets hide all this and wrap it up in a mile of red tape

It's actually not that hard to understand that why there was so much blacked out was due to national security.

originally posted by: TheEndOfItAll

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow

It's actually not that hard to understand that why there was so much blacked out was due to national security.

Bull#. It's the greatest coverup in the history of the USA.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

A bit off topic - but why use fox news as a source? They are just as bias as CNN. You're not going to get a honest take on anything with them.

originally posted by: TheEndOfItAll

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
If Trump is so guilty then why does 80% of the affidavit need to be redacted ?

The warrant was Completely Legal right ? Biden had no Prior knowledge of the raid right ? Then everything should be transparent , whats the hold up ?

www.foxnews.com...

There is no need for me to write up a massive post it's a simple question , why would the Very Justice department that confidently raided a former president need to redact basically the entire affidavit ?

It's a rhetorical question really , but I'm just tripping over myself to see what people have to say ?

Trump Bad , Trump Guilty but no lets hide all this and wrap it up in a mile of red tape

It's actually not that hard to understand that why there was so much blacked out was due to national security.

how convenient for them.

it's meant to keep information from we the people.
not other govts.

i'm sure trump had the only copy in his basement, right?

lol.

well, that's how every govt works, right?

they teach that in potus school.

i wonder how many classified docs the fbi would find in their own house or the pentagon?or adam schiff heads office?

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

the 'it's classified' thing is a real thing. If you remember Devin Nunes, and Ratcliff wanted to declassify a set of documents that would blow the lid off of the entire corrupt process, but obviously was not allowed to, due to those who's heads would roll being part of the IC, who also controls classifications.

I don't know why Trump couldn't have declassed them, and released them, but apparently there is a reason. They all wanted them out, but could not. That seems to be what this is all about, and the DOJ/FBI is tripping over themselves to stop this from coming forward.

If it was as simple as some classified documents, this would all be over now, but it isn't.

There should be one reason and one reason only to classify any documents and that is if it would benefit an enemy country. AND NO, documents that hide any crime or collusion in a crime by domestic entities should be open. All these documents I've read about should be clear and open and the guilty prosecuted. No matter how damaging to the state, these perpetrators must not be allowed to just carry on regardless.

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
If Trump is so guilty then why does 80% of the affidavit need to be redacted ?

because its classified information and would damage our national security if released to the public.

originally posted by: namehere

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
If Trump is so guilty then why does 80% of the affidavit need to be redacted ?

because its classified information and would damage our national security if released to the public.

I fixed it for you:
"because its information that would damage Joe Biden and the Democrats if released to the public."

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Just remember, you're listening to the band that sang such hits as

"You Gotta Pass It (To See What's In It!)"

and one of my favorites

"I Can't Tell You What I'll Do 'Cause You Won't Vote for Me"


This is just new single off their latest album.

originally posted by: schuyler
Because it's all about classified information.

Yeah this I know , I said it's rhetorical .

Since when has the MSM or the Left for that matter given a damn about releasing classified information ? If it benefits them they will release it end of story , If it does not benefit them its kept in the dark .

a reply to: network dude

I don't know why Trump couldn't have declassed them, and released them, but apparently there is a reason. They all wanted them out, but could not. That seems to be what this is all about, and the DOJ/FBI is tripping over themselves to stop this from coming forward.

Agreed .

If it was as simple as some classified documents, this would all be over now, but it isn't.

That is the point I was pushing across but alas so many stick to the narrative like fly paper.

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow

originally posted by: schuyler
Because it's all about classified information.

Yeah this I know , I said it's rhetorical .

Since when has the MSM or the Left for that matter given a damn about releasing classified information ? If it benefits them they will release it end of story , If it does not benefit them its kept in the dark .

I seem to recall a certain Julian Assange who's life has been ruined specifically because he released classified information. And there are many others.

There was also information and names of people who informed the feds that the former President still had classified documents after his lawyer attested they had all been turned over as required by the subpoena in June. Obviously at this point the public and the former President does not need to know who ratted him out.
It would also protect the people from witness intimidation or public threats.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow

originally posted by: schuyler
Because it's all about classified information.

Yeah this I know , I said it's rhetorical .

Since when has the MSM or the Left for that matter given a damn about releasing classified information ? If it benefits them they will release it end of story , If it does not benefit them its kept in the dark .

I seem to recall a certain Julian Assange who's life has been ruined specifically because he released classified information. And there are many others.

Really chr0 the wikileaks guy ?

He is neither a Politician nor relevant to the point I'm making , He released classified information on mass with little to no regard for anyone or himself for that matter.

He leaked information that was damning in general and he did so without the guidance or okay from the powers that be , Classified information is leaked all the time but always for a reason .

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
a reply to: network dude

That is the point I was pushing across but alas so many stick to the narrative like fly paper.

In which case why can't you be honest about your question? You already have a point of view, a conclusion that you are "pushing." To say you "need help understanding" is disingenuous. Just tell us your point of view instead of setting everyone up with a false question so you can later criticize them.