False claims about Pfizer vaccine stem from company's release of 80,000 pages of documents

My goodness there seems to be a wave of MSM outlets defending Pfizer vaxs and booster as effective after Pfizer documents and which are still likely to be released not all files had being released.

Here we have USA today defending Pfizer in almost comical and desperate way trying to debunk every single of those documents release. If they were journalists maybe would explain why Pfizer wanted to hide from public for 55 years than?

False claims about Pfizer vaccine stem from company's release of 80,000 pages of documents

But multiple experts told USA TODAY the claims about the vaccine's low efficacy rate stem from misinterpretations of Pfizer's 2020 phase three clinical trial.

The same USA Today is to lazy to look up at what happened and how low efficacy with the Israeli vaccination after the third booster dose. Having a fourth dose made no difference.

Ironical enough in the article they keep pausing that beloved number of the Media which is either 90% or 95% efficacy rate.
This is the same excuse and number MSM outlet shad being using since the start of the vaccination the only issue with that efficacy rate for how long did it last?

A few weeks? three months?

In the article they keep claiming that the C19 mRNA vaccines are safe for fetuses? based on what long term studies?

Rather amusing how desperately USA today is defending efficacy rate. Despite the fact that Israeli own data had suggested Waning in Effectiveness of Pfizer Vaccine.

The 95%, 90% efficacy rate claims are from the drug markers. Yet they never do say for how long a booster or the vax would last with their so called "boosted protection"


Why the push for pageant women to get vaccinated without a long term study? because CDC says its safe therefore it is? how many foods CDC claimed it said it was safe before removing them?

“COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now or might become pregnant in the future,” reads the agency's website.

USA Today is a legit news site. You put in the quote right out that data was misinterpreted on social media, which we all know is infested with misinformation:

But multiple experts told USA TODAY the claims about the vaccine's low efficacy rate stem from misinterpretations of Pfizer's 2020 phase three clinical trial.

So what's your point? USA Today is not the one spreading misinformation and lies.

originally posted by: ChiefD
USA Today is a legit news site. You put in the quote right out that data was misinterpreted on social media, which we all know is infested with misinformation:

But multiple experts told USA TODAY the claims about the vaccine's low efficacy rate stem from misinterpretations of Pfizer's 2020 phase three clinical trial.

So what's your point? USA Today is not the one spreading misinformation and lies.

Ahh, a pattern is emerging. How obvious. Did you know that ACTUAL efficacy is around 0.8% - 0.85% over natural immune system? Funny really that some would still promote this poison for use against something now little more dangerous than a cold.

originally posted by: ChiefD
USA Today is a legit news site. You put in the quote right out that data was misinterpreted on social media, which we all know is infested with misinformation:

But multiple experts told USA TODAY the claims about the vaccine's low efficacy rate stem from misinterpretations of Pfizer's 2020 phase three clinical trial.

So what's your point? USA Today is not the one spreading misinformation and lies.

USA Today has about 781,000 total subscribers, it's not influential one way or another, besides aren't most of their stories farmed in? I know they used to be, but that was when they had subscribers of around 3 million

originally posted by: ChiefD

But multiple experts told USA TODAY the claims about the vaccine's low efficacy rate stem from misinterpretations of Pfizer's 2020 phase three clinical trial.

Well that settles it then!

The word “expert” lost its lustre a while back.

originally posted by: ChiefD


So what's your point? USA Today is not the one spreading misinformation and lies.

Actually, that's exactly what they are doing..

nypost.com...

a reply to: ChiefD

The MSM outlet no matter if its USA today always lie and spread misinformation that the boosters are effectivce while always citing the questionable drug markers own drug trail which showed 90 95% efficacy rate.

The Media never does say for long the protection of boosters and original vax do last.

a reply to: ChiefD

You had the same as i had mentioned that tried to hide that data for 55 years.

Pfizer's 2020 phase three clinical trial

A very questionable clinical trials.

originally posted by: ChiefD
USA Today is not the one spreading misinformation and lies.

Please explain. This seems like this is exactly what they are doing.

a reply to: vNex92

I am at the point with all the covid mRNA BS where if you took it and you're happy, great, just don't bitch when your body is falling apart and you've lost your mind in the next year. If you chose accelerated death and elongated suicide because you were to ef'ing lazy to do the research, well, you chose badly.

In the meantime, if you took the jab, STFU, stop being an unpaid cheerleader for big Pharmakia, none of the rest of us are going to take that poison.

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: vNex92

Far from 'safe for fetuses' when the miscarriage rate jumped 450% since these covid vaccines became a thing. Lets see them explain that.. 450% despite a 'falling and massive dying off of the population.' So they can't even claim that the population 'grew' x% which is why those numbers are so high.

Especially 2nd & 3rd term 'abortions' are insanely common after having the vaccine. Considering the fact that after 12 weeks (start of 2nd trimester) the chance of a 'failed pregnancy' falls to next to zero. That first huge 'drop' in failed pregnancies occur the minute you can "hear the heart" which literally reduces any failed pregnancy by half..

So 12% of all pregnancies fail before you even get the test, Until you hear the heart beat you have a 32% TOTAL(including the 12% risk before knowing)** risk of pregnancy failure as long as the heart beat is 'normal'. Once you hear that heart beat it drops to about 3%, and at 12 weeks your 'in the clear' persay.

Now add that to the fact that 'spontanous abortions' are occuring in the 2nd and 3rd Trimester, they are completely full of #.

originally posted by: litterbaux

originally posted by: ChiefD
USA Today is not the one spreading misinformation and lies.

Please explain. This seems like this is exactly what they are doing.

nypost.com...

And how many tv ads for Pfizer do these tv networks play? If you where running a large tv network trying to make a profit, what is a few lies and a bit of spin when it comes to advertising material?

There is also the propaganda influence, tell a lie enough and with conviction, some people are going to believe it.

How would it go if these large media networks actually started reporting the facts? The media industry is against anyone that goes on about conspiracies. Is there any staff left in these organizations that are capable in sorting out the facts from the fiction? Or just take your your pay check and say what you are told to say.

Eventually the truth will come out, by then Pfizer would of made its billions and onto the next operation.

a reply to: ChiefD

What's the matter,taken the Pfizer poison have we?
Denial is a powerful thing when your time could be limited on this earth.
Moral of the story- never trust the government or their henchmen in msm or pharma.

a reply to: vNex92

This , wow, this is so ridiculous. They may as well release a article that says "Amber heard herself testifies under oath that she lied about her abuse" but her claims are fake news..somehow"

But consider this, more than half the world population has a IQ under 100 IQ points so this stuff simply works and they know it.

originally posted by: kwakakev
And how many tv ads for Pfizer do these tv networks play? If you where running a large tv network trying to make a profit, what is a few lies and a bit of spin when it comes to advertising material?

There is also the propaganda influence, tell a lie enough and with conviction, some people are going to believe it.

How would it go if these large media networks actually started reporting the facts? The media industry is against anyone that goes on about conspiracies. Is there any staff left in these organizations that are capable in sorting out the facts from the fiction? Or just take your your pay check and say what you are told to say.

Eventually the truth will come out, by then Pfizer would of made its billions and onto the next operation.

Nothing to see here, move along.