Area 51 - The Western Gateway
Many people believe that places like "Area 51" are places for holding of particular technology, or things to do with aliens. But this is not the case
(at least, not entirely)
Area 51 is what it is, because of (the focus point of) where it is located. Relative to past, and future cycles
It is to do with creating a cyclic constant and precedence, for retrospective acuity, (with)in perpetuity
Think of it like this:
Imagine in the future, you create a type of technology that allows you to send things backwards across time. Or communicate across time
Where would you send this, to ensure that it was received by the people you want it to be received by?
How can you be sure that it wouldn't end up reappearing somewhere, where it would be stuck inside a tree, or a cliff, or a building of a past
civilisation?
Or ensure it wasn't received by the wrong people?
You create a place for perpetuity, under very strict guidelines, away from any possible impediments, past or future, secure and secluded
And if you were to do this correctly, with the aim of your future selves, assisting your past selves?
Then technically, all you would need to do is create the past point. And wait for your future selves to make contact
You have created something that will be a certainty into the long-distant future. And something that will be a project priority for many years to come
with all the future technology and advancements
Mathematically, it would mean that if such advances ever come to be possible, you would be the point of reference and contact for such things
In the meantime, you would busy yourself with trying to create the technologies for future, that you would eventually use to make contact with your
past selves
"51" means portal or gateway
Some would refer to it as “The Western Gateway”
Pine Gap in Australia is another version. Though this is a closed network gateway. Meaning that it only exists as an alternate possibility to the
Western gateway (Area 51), for the purposes of ensuring that the U.S Military has a foothold with(in) the Northern gateway, in the Northern Territory,
Australia (where I live)
They are very specifically chosen because of their location
There is a big problem with the theory behind what they are doing though. A reason why it will never work
They are discounting something I refer to as "The Mutual Imperative"
"The Mutual Imperative" means, that if you are to create such a project based on complex nonlinear dynamics, in a linear perspective. You need to also
be certain of inclusion of the imperative
This means those who would be capable to creating such technology
Blood(lines) work in exactly the same way as focal points on Earth do
You need to align both. Not just one or the other. One will not work without the other
If you don't have the right people included in the project, it will never work
It is far more divergent than even this though
If the project is done in such a way that it excludes the common imperative, then you/they are far more likely to propagate exclusion (with)in the
imperative, than they/you are to aggregate it in precipitation
Meaning, that if the person who would understand and develop such technologies "first" before everyone else, does not know about the program, or is
not involved with the program, or simply does not trust those like the U.S.A Government and Military (or would never work with them)?
The project will never work
They would know by now if the project has failed or not, simply by the level of contact and interaction with them, from those “unknown” attending
focus points like Area 51
If they are simply "Observing" them, or keeping an eye on them? Coming though and having a look at them, with little-to-no contact?
Then the project has failed
Someone else is in control of the technology in future. Someone who does not trust them
Probability suggests that this will be/is far more likely to be/is the case, than the project working
The funny part is, that they are doing it to themselves through the secrecy attached to such understandings
If they were open and transparent with what it was they doing, with the public, it would encourage generations of people from all across the world, to
want to come and work on the project
By keeping it secret, they are ensuring they cut off the very thing they need to make it work
The very process they employ to ensure they succeed, is/will (likely/probably) be the very process that will/is ensure/ensuring they will/have/are
fail/failed/failing
edit on 27 10 21 by Compendium because: Edited title and content