There has been too few discussions regarding intellectual property rights and covid vaccines.
First, can the synthetic genes in the vaccines be patented? Yes
, the Supreme Court has already ruled in favor of the geneticists (link to
court ruling on page):
"A gene patent is the exclusive rights to a specific sequence of DNA (a gene) given by a government to the individual, organization, or
corporation who claims to have first identified the gene. Once granted a gene patent, the holder of the patent dictates how the gene can be
Next, the argument by the establishment to discredit the notion that a human can be patented:
"Humans cannot be patented, regardless of whether they are vaccinated or unvaccinated. COVID-19 vaccines do not alter people’s DNA."
The key to their argument is that the DNA is not altered
, and therefore not a permanent change. However, there are a multitude of research
papers regarding mRNA vaccine use of CRISPR/CAS9 that disagree, and indicate direct changes to DNA:
"RNA can also be engineered, as Jennifer Doudna and others discovered, to target genes for editing. Using the CRISPR system adapted from bacteria,
RNA can guide scissors-like enzymes to specific sequences of DNA in order to eliminate or edit a gene. This technique has already been used in trials
to cure sickle cell anemia. Now it is also being used in the war against COVID...
More controversially, CRISPR could be used to create “designer babies” with inheritable genetic changes."
Inheritable genetic changes are permanent ones.
The argument that is made to counter this is that the mRNA vaccines do not reach the nucleus. However, CRISPR/CAS9 is very good at reaching the
nucleus. Simple online searches result in many papers and articles specifically mentioning CRISPRs ability to alter DNA, and this can happen through
guide RNA, viral vectors (which the vaccines have), and during mitosis:
"The Cas9 protein is responsible for locating and cleaving target DNA, both in natural and in artificial CRISPR/Cas systems."
"CRISPR-Cas9 must translocate to the nuclei of the transfected cells for executing its nuclease activity on the genomic DNA...
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system has two major components: a synthetic RNA “guide RNA” (gRNA) and a non-specific CRISPR-Cas9 protein with
nuclease activity... Therefore, one must check if CRISPR-Cas9 is actually binding to the correct region on the DNA."
So, how can this affect the nucleus? During mitosis (cell division) , and through viral vectors.
"The translocation of DNA/RNA into the nucleus is mediated by the nuclear pore complex and mitosis (when the nuclear envelope breaks down and
Stable (permanent) transfections are most effectively achieved by using a viral vector, though they can also occur at low frequency following
the introduction of plasmid DNA. It is common for researchers to stably transfect only DNA encoding Cas9 (but not guide RNA) to produce a
Cas9-expressing cell line. Then, gRNAs for different targets can be introduced to the Cas9-expressing cells through transient transfection."
The mitosis statements are very important. The vaccines are loaded with infectious mRNA, targeting billions of cells. Since every cell undergoes
mitosis during its lifecycle, there are literally billions of chances for permanent genetic changes in every vaccine dose and booster. This, of
course, is additional to the guide RNA being used, and any other peculiarities of cell lifecycles.
People can decide for themselves whether they feel that the vaccines will induce permanent changes, but I think its inevitable.
Obviously, this leads back to the question "can humans be patented?". This conversation isn't happening enough. The courts say genes can be
patented, and people have been voluntarily taking them whether coerced or not. If the change is permanent, then it is conceivable that; the person
will no longer be considered a "human being" and therefore not qualify for human rights (become cattle, chattle, or livestock), and if the person has
a child, then they will owe royalties, which will unlikely be payable (generational slavery).
To my knowledge, there are zero court rulings protecting people from these very real possibilities. If anyone knows of any, please reply with the
It should also be noted that they are in the process of producing "vaccine enhancers
" that are DNA based:
edit on 21-9-2021 by Wisenox because: Changed
cannot to can.