It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SirHardHarry
originally posted by: RoScoLaz5
originally posted by: SirHardHarry Based upon the number of schools having to quarantine students and/or go virtual in the first few weeks of the year, why is this a bad idea?
because those quarantines were based on 'cases', and cases are utter meaningless BS. like the whole 'pandemic' that wasn't.
It's about positives. Those who have tested positive, and are therefore infectious.
originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: VulcanWerks
How old are your children? Pfizer is approved for those over 16; emergency use for those 12-15.
Based upon the number of schools having to quarantine students and/or go virtual in the first few weeks of the year, why is this a bad idea?
Don't we want to keep our kids as safe as possible using the scientific knowledge we have so they can safely return to school?
originally posted by: LordAhriman
I have a vaccine "pAsSpOrT" for all 4 of my kids so that they can go to school. They've taken a few shots for a sh1tload of ailments, as have I.
I don't get the butthurt.
originally posted by: CrazeeWorld777
a reply to: VulcanWerks
Surely court actions will ensue? Especially if any of these children were to become ill from the vaccine? The Companies such as Pffizer, Moderna, Astra etc.. may get away with it because of their policies and legal documents but school staff, such as headmasters and also those above who make the final decisions must be liable? They don't have the same get out clause as the pharma companies do they?
school staff, such as headmasters and also those above who make the final decisions must be liable? They don't have the same get out clause as the pharma companies do they?