It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Claim about Pfizer vaccine effectiveness lacks key context "Yet They Ignore Israel?"

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 27 2021 @ 09:24 PM
link   
CDC are now trying to sell you the vaxs by teaming up with Mayo Clinic. They are now to claim and suggest that the data coming out suggesting that the Pfizer efficiency is at 39% is to undermine the FDA approval

Sounds of desperation? AP Fact Checkers are once again in full force.

Claim about Pfizer vaccine effectiveness lacks key context



CLAIM: The Pfizer vaccine is only 42% effective against COVID-19.





THE FACTS: As the Pfizer vaccine gained official FDA approval Monday, some social media users pointed to a recent finding that the shot was only 42% effective at preventing COVID-19 infection in July. The posts used that figure to suggest the vaccine is ineffective and to question why it earned the regulatory agency’s highest stamp of approval. The 42% figure comes from an Aug. 8 study that has not yet been peer reviewed or published in a scientific journal. It was conducted by the health care technology company nference and the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota. The study tracked vaccinated and unvaccinated people from January to July to compare the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines’ effectiveness at preventing any type of infection — asymptomatic and symptomatic.

The MSM is trying to suggest that the 42% effective at preventing COVID-19 infection in July data comes from America yet they ignore the fully released from Israel.

If the vaxs work why do they need booster shots every six months even in their debunking myth busting they admit that well its true its waning in its effectiveness.



However, he said the research does point to the need to develop booster shots to bolster waning immunity over time, an issue experts predicted early on.

But how many or much of booster shots is enough? 10? 20? we had never seen a vax needing this many booster shots while its immunity wanes as they admit it here.
does point to the need to develop booster shots to bolster waning immunity over time





Effectiveness is expected to wane over time

So the 42% is not a myth then?

They keep citing Pfizer.



Pfizer reported in late July that six months into its original study, the vaccine remained 97% protective against severe COVID-19. Protection against milder infection decreased slightly, from a peak of 96% two months after the second dose to 84% by six months.

Data from last year
Pfizer and BioNTech to submit Covid-19 vaccine data to FDA as full results show 95% efficacy



posted on Aug, 27 2021 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: HawkEyi

It is 16% after 6-7 months.

www.timesofisrael.com...



Recent data released by the Health Ministry shows that those who were first to receive their two doses of the Pfizer COVID vaccine are more likely now to be infected, as the vaccine appears to lose protection potency over time.

Data released by the Health Ministry last week suggested that people vaccinated in January have just 16% protection against infection now, while in those vaccinated in April, the effectiveness was at 75%.



www.forbes.com...


Over a 4-week period (20 June to 17 July 2021), Pfizer's general effectiveness decreased as the time before exposure increased: efficacy was 79% for those who received their second dose in April, 69% for March, 44% for February, and 16% for people who were fully-vaccinated back in January.

edit on 27-8-2021 by infolurker because: (no reason given)

edit on 27-8-2021 by infolurker because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 27 2021 @ 09:43 PM
link   
a reply to: infolurker

I think, this could be considered good news in some sense. If you remember, in the earlier days of vaccination, some scientists were concerned about the vaccine effects on female fertility. Given that the efficacy wanes with time, would imply theoretically that potential vaccine side effects on fertility are only temporary. Profit.



posted on Aug, 28 2021 @ 12:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: fiora
a reply to: infolurker

I think, this could be considered good news in some sense. If you remember, in the earlier days of vaccination, some scientists were concerned about the vaccine effects on female fertility. Given that the efficacy wanes with time, would imply theoretically that potential vaccine side effects on fertility are only temporary. Profit.


The problem is that the lie remains. There is no pandemic. Numbers continue to fall and a vaccine against nothing can have any effectiveness you assign it. It’s statistics founded on a lie therefore irrelevant and this hocus pocus being ejaculated by the talking heads is still mind bendingly dull and tedious.



new topics

top topics
 
4

log in

join