It's two dragons and one beast

a reply to: glend

You are talking about D.N.A through the lungs

The physical tree itself you are referring to is the lungs. The breath I referred to. Anything animate has some form of lung/tree to breathe. That's why it's often shown enclosed, as the body/container of/for the tree

Holy spirit is just anything within the fluid dynamics of this world

The rule of 5ths is misunderstood to the point where we understand very little, if any, about it

We understand the harmonious nature of musical 5th, that's it

The rule of 5th is that:

1 is equal to 5
Which is equal to 0.2
Which is also equal to 1.2

Incremental existence

.1 and .1 equal to 6th
1/5 of 1.2 is .24
Which gives 4 even increments of .01 in 4ths, equal to 1

.01, 1 and .1
Equal to 4, 5, 6

5 is the layer bridge

Every increment stepped up
Gives a return increment stepped down

4th and 6th are the same thing
Just in different directions

Meaning, as I said before, Masculine and Feminine are illusions of perception based upon our position in propagation

It only has meaning in our bridge bodily form. Outside this, everything is both masculine and feminine

This is what they are referring to with the 5 layers

Every time you step up a increment
You also create a relative internal sub-increment

The best way to describe it, so it can be visualised is:

It's like opening the top layer of a Matryoshka doll set and when you do, not only does the size of the next layers doll increase to become the same size as the one you just took off, but another doll is also created at the other smaller end of the scale right inside

This is how cellular complexity propagates

We aren't larger as humans than we used to be, the world is just expanding and getting more complex, which makes us look comparitively bigger

Stone/rock is getting smaller comparatively

Which interestingly, makes very old bones seem way bigger than they used to actually be when they were alive

A T-Rex would have only been about the size of a Kangaroo compared to humans living in the same times

In a spherical system this balances as 5/8, giving a 1/2 return. (Because 1 and 8 are the same thing). The force of gravity

a reply to: Compendium

I don't see the tree itself as being specifically physical, as in lungs, but a union of both the physical (female) and non-physical (male) self. With masculine and feminine just being labels that denote one or the other. The Sefiroth (or Chrakra's) being the energy points that exist thoughout the body. That can either empower physical sensational or spiritual bliss, but not both.

The all-seeing-eye which you mentioned earlier I aee as a bit of a misnomer. Our inner eye is our seat of conciousnous (no-mind) with our outer eye being our ego-mind (Eve's serpent). When energy flows through the Sefiroth (or Chrakra's) the inner corrects the outer so both become one (making the outer like the inner and the inner like the outer). This is echoed in Matthew 6:22 "The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.".

There is great subsance in numerology that teases our mind for truth. But those truths in themselves just reinforce the rigidity of our mind making it less receptive to greater truths. I suspect that our existance is not to find truth with mind, but to experience truth with body and soul. Breathing in all, as it is, rather that trying to grasp what is, with mind. Perhaps all truths will come at a latter date when we are ready to recieve them.

a reply to: glend

I actually like you glend because you have a good outlook on things, that is very positive at its roots

Too many people here want to try teach, but not listen

I think we see things very similarly. But I think you see things from a more spiritually receptive and open mindset than I do

I'll read on similar mythology, but I can't accept that things are as they are said to be, unless it can be correlated to a scientific or mathematic principle

Something like opposite sides of the same bridge

I'm very much of the opinion that all mythology and science meet somewhere in the middle, we just have to understand where and how the bridge works

Though I think there is one simple understanding for why we exist

We are the fulfillment of need
It is nothing mysterious
A need to fill within you
The universe you feel around you

I worked out the meaning of life when I was 15 years old, on acid

Consumption

It's that simple. The one thing that everything needs do, living or otherwise, in order for this world to exist

Though the question people are really asking is not "What's the meaning of life?", it's "How do I bring meaning to life?"

The answer to this is the opposite of consumption

Love
Give what you can
Whenever you can
How you can

To give, when your primary need and purpose is to consume
Is to be something worthy of life and a place in the world

It returns peace to the heart

You understand this, everything else is not only simple, but it seems pointless to argue over

Just love

The world will break you over and over when you do
But the pieces get more and more beautiful the finer they get

(Lyrics from one of my songs)
"Been a while since my eyes were open
To see everyone sleeping and a world that's broken
Died for love and it set me free
Now in perfect love and perfect pain
I'm on my knees"

Anyhow, a little off topic now

a reply to: Compendium

Thank you, Compendium. The exact same thought crossed my mind. We actually expressing the same thing from differering perspectives.

I do like your concepts of consumption and love. But there is something that exists in love that many don't realize. That love itself exists in the mysterious ayn that religions label God. By opening to love we open channels not only to mysterious ayn but to each other. With thoughts themselves transferring as if we were one. I have tasted that experience yet I believe that was merely the tip of a much larger ice-berg that I couldn't experience.

Your song is beautiful.

I like you too.