'smoking gun' evidence against Fauci & 'Covid/Fakeccine' lies, but only if...

...people read & publicize this researched, fully referenced federal lawsuit document.

Preliminary Injunction Link
I've quoted just the tip of the iceberg - 1st a section of table of contents:

SUMMARY OF FACTS........................................................................ 3
The Unlawful Vaccine Emergency Use Authorizations................................... 3
(1) 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C): There is No Emergency.............................3
(2) § 360bbb–3(c)(1): There is in Fact no Serious or Life-Threatening Disease
or Condition..........................,.........................................................7
(3) § 360bbb–3(c)(2)(A): The Vaccines Do Not Diagnose, Treat or Prevent
SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19................................................................ 7
(4) § 360bbb–3(c)(2)(B): The Known and Potential Risks of the Vaccines
Outweigh their Known and Potential Benefits.........................................9
(5) § 360bbb–3(c)(3): There Are Adequate, Approved and Available
Alternatives to the Vaccines................................................................20

Each section below is just a bit of material from each numbered title above, in order, starting with # (1)

Further, the Defendants and their counterparts in state governments used the specter of “asymptomatic spread” — the notion that fundamentally healthy people could cause COVID-19 in others — to justify the purported emergency. But there is no credible scientific evidence that demonstrates that the phenomenon of “asymptomatic spread” is real. On the contrary, on June 7, 2020, Dr. Maria Von Kerkhov, head of the WHO’s Emerging Diseases and Zoonosis Unit, told a press conference that from the known research, asymptomatic spread was “very rare.” “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.” She added for emphasis: “it’s very rare."

On September 9, 2020, Dr. Fauci was forced to admit in an official press conference:
"[E]ven if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person,
even if there is a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers."

The DHHS Secretary can issue and maintain the Vaccine EUAs “only if” they are “effective” in diagnosing, treating or preventing a disease or condition.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) data shows that the Vaccines are not effective in treating or preventing SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19. Deaths from COVID-19 in those who have received the recommended dosages of the Vaccines increased from 160 as of April 30, 2021 to 535 as of June 1, 2021. Further, a total of 10,262 SARS-CoV-2 “breakthrough infections” of those who have already received the full recommended dosage of the Vaccines
were reported to the CDC from 46 states and territories between January 1, 2021 and April 30, 2021.

The DHHS Secretary can issue and maintain the Vaccine EUAs “only if” (emphasis added) the known and potential risks of each Vaccine are outweighed by its known and potential benefits.

However, the Vaccines were authorized without any studies demonstrating where the spike proteins traveled in the body following vaccination, how long they remain active and what effect they have. A group of international scientists has recently obtained the “biodistribution study” for the mRNA Vaccines from Japanese regulators. The study reveals that unlike traditional vaccines, this spike protein enters the bloodstream and circulates throughout the body over several days post-vaccination. It accumulates in a number of tissues, such as the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and ovaries. It fuses with receptors on our blood platelets, and also with cells lining our blood vessels. It can cause platelets to clump leading to clotting, bleeding and heart inflammation. It can also cross the blood-brain barrier and cause brain damage. It can be transferred to infants through breast milk. The VAERS system includes reports of infants suckling from vaccinated mothers experiencing bleeding disorders in the gastrointestinal tract.

Increased Risk of Death from Vaccines
The government operated VAERS database is intended to function as an “early warning” system for potential health risks caused by vaccines. It is broadcasting a red alert. Of the 262,000 total accumulated reports in VAERS, only 1772 are not related to COVID-19. The database indicates that the total reported vaccine deaths in the first quarter of 2021 represents a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine deaths, year-on-year. In ten years (2009-2019) there were 1529 vaccine deaths, whereas in the first quarter of 2021 there have been over 4,000. Further, 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 are caused by the COVID-19 Vaccines, only 1% being caused by the numerous other vaccines reported in the system. It is estimated that VAERS only captures 1% to at best 10% of all vaccine adverse events.

The DHHS Secretary can issue and maintain the Vaccine EUAs “only if” (emphasis added) there is no adequate, approved and available alternative to the Vaccines.

There are numerous alternative safe and effective treatments for COVID-19. These are supported by over 300 studies, including randomized controlled studies. Tens of thousands of physicians have publicly attested, and many have testified under oath, as to the safety and efficacy of the alternatives. Globally and in the United States, treatments such as Ivermectin, Budesonide, Dexamethasone, convalescent plasma and monoclonal antibodies, Vitamin D, Zinc, Azithromycin, Hydroxychloroquine are being used to great effect, and are far safer than the COVID-19 Vaccines.

Observational studies in Delhi and Mexico City show dramatic reductions in COVID-19 case and death counts following mass distribution of Ivermectin. These results align with those of a study in Argentina, in which 800 healthcare professionals received Ivermectin, while another 400 did not.Of the 800, not a single person contracted COVID-19, while more than half of the control group did contract it.
Dr. Pierre Kory, a lung specialist who has treated more COVID-19 patients than most doctors, representing a group of some of the most highly published physicians in the world, with over 2,000 peer reviewed publications among them, testified before the U.S. Senate in December 2020. He testified that based on 9 months of review of scientific data from 30 studies, Ivermectin obliterates transmission of the SARS-CoV- 2 virus and is a powerful prophylactic (if you take it, you will not contract COVID-19). Four large randomized controlled trials totaling over 1500 patients demonstrate that Ivermectin is safe and effective as a prophylaxis. In early outpatient treatment, three randomized controlled trials and multiple observational studies show that Ivermectin reduces the need for hospitalization and death in statistically significant numbers.

I highly recommend reading the entire injunction - it is truly eye opening.

But if there's a cure, the pharmaceutical industry can't cash in on endless variants and they can't generically modify their servants. They've got a lot invested in the marketing and nearly all the media outlets are fully funded to continue pushing the kool-aid. To stop know would just expose them for the parasites they are.

Hi Lost. Yuppers.

It's difficult to remain reasonable when every day has some sanctimonious, smug consumer of the mainstream narrative try to urge my "compliance" and go on to explain why my "hesitancy" is really magical thinking and unreasonable.

I start to explain my reasons, get hung up on trying to remember names, degrees /training, citations and nuances of the more technical arguments, and end up saying "fine, I'm unreasonable and will help kill all the old people" and stalk off.

Of course, every argument has been met with "well, that's one kook expert's outlook and all science is contentious and we're in an emergency..." and I've almost gone to the dark place where I say "Heck, let them take their shots and I'll not and we all die someday, anyway, so at least I'll go out throwing a finger to the conniving overlords."

I've never seen anything like this... and while I was aware of the studies into social engineering and actual mind control, I never thought they'd actually use it to this degree. Silly me.

a reply to: starshift

Very true -
- but gee, wouldn't it be fun to "expose" a bunch of hypocritical, lying "parasites' and all their government toadys pushing a society destroying narrative, just so they can make more money?

a reply to: lostgirl
Great post! Finally, others besides my wife and it’s going mainstream.

a reply to: Baddogma
Hey Baddogma,

I know exactly how you feel! And if wasn't for the fact that they are now pushing 'vaccinating' children sooo hard -
- I would probably just sit back in my 'social distance' and let the cards fall where they may...

...but I have a 23 year old daughter and after reading this injunction document, I thought, "How could I live with myself if someone we know was harmed, and I could have prevented it by sharing this information?"

And I'm with you on the "social engineering" stuff - it freaks me out a bit - how successfully 'they' have manipulated the populace...people are practically brain washed!!

a reply to: lostgirl

Good. I hope this gets somewhere and Fauci might finally be put to justice. He's deserved it since the 80's for what he did to aids patients. He deserved to be put on trial for treason for his handling of anthrax specimens. His involvement in the Wuhan lab amounts to crimes against humanity.

I didn't know much about Fauci prior to this covid stuff, never heard of him. A look into his history though and man the dude makes me sick. He's the epitome of everything wrong with the medical industry.

a reply to: lostgirl

Practically? You must have access to a more moderate pool ... my cadre' is all in with the community spirit of getting their shots for grandma!

I feel for ya in regards to threatened family.

If it's as bad as it seems, most of my friends and family are soon to be passed tense.

I'm hoping that some of the more esoteric ideas about "reality" will be true and I'll skip over to the world where people have kept their critical thinking skills... but so far, every morning has me still here in this Plato-esque cavern.

a reply to: lostgirl

I read the entire document yesterday and downloaded it in case I need it later. It gives alot of information with sources. The worst thing in it and the most worrying, to me, is the fertility issues. That's truly scary!

It is a great document!

Here's an edited down version of the video that broke out of censorship on YT and has managed to convince some pie-eyed normies I know that maybe, possibly, something nefarious might really, truly be happening...



Title (for when it's taken down) is: Spike protein is very dangerous it's cytotoxic (w Brett Weinstein, Robert Malone...)

a reply to: Baddogma

Thanks for that video Baddogma!

Here's another good one - It's Dr. Peter McCullough, a Professor at A & M College of Medicine in Texas

www.lewrockwell.com...

a reply to: lostgirl

Lol number 1, District of Alabama

Lol number 2, “There is no emergency”.

Lol number 3, this is a preliminary injunction where the plaintiffs make accusations/claims….not facts.

a reply to: MDDoxs

So, you glanced at the title page in the link...

...and chose ignorance instead of even bothering to read the OP, which quotes the actual lawsuit containing:

1. real legal precedents, showing that our government broke the law.

2. peer reviewed research, proving the lies they have been telling us.

3. actual medical facts about the dangers of the vaccines.

If you're too lazy to read here's a 25 minute video:

Dr. Peter McCullough, Professor Texas A&M Medical College

a reply to: lostgirl

67 page document, some must believe reading this many pages as a feat for a select few.

Once again,

Lol number 1, this filing is a joke and wildly accepted on both sides of the isle as not being able to pass muster

Lol number 2, the “research” and research being referenced is bunk in the former case and limited in scope for the latter. No new evidence of significance is being referenced in this filing.

Lol number 3, “actual medical facts”.?, how can you even say that when this group referenced, lauded and held high one Stella Emmanual . The same Dr. Stella who claimed sickness was caused by sex with demons.

My fornication with demons have done me no harm.

a reply to: MDDoxs

I can only offer that it took me months of obsessively skimming data from all sources to become as alarmed as I currently am.

It's easy to pick one name out as a "kook" in an accumulation of data and thus invalidate the rest by association, but again, some of the people who are risking their reputations (and perhaps lives) to warn us about this medical procedure are Nobel prize winners and one of them developed the actual Mrna technique itself.

Add the paper trail documenting the plans for changing the world, the strange anti-scientific, anti-individual rights world cooperation, mass censorship and the obviously one sided, repeated narrative pushed by the media and one may rise above the smug sureness of partisan group think.

Try it.

I must admit that the resulting conclusions are not pleasant.

a reply to: Iamonlyhuman

Remember what BIll Gates said about the world population in the ted show?

a reply to: MDDoxs

LOL, a post typical of a person with no substantive counterpoints.

The "emergency" was contrived by WHO, Fauci and the mainstream media. The image of an emergency was sustained by propaganda and fear-mongering.

LOSTGIRL

Thanks so much for providing this information. I did not read every detail, but I'm presuming this is the heart of the lawsuit filed by America's Frontline Doctors. They are the good guys.

With luck and some conscientious judges, those doctors may be able to overcome the damage caused by the other members of the healthcare profession in this country, the snake oil salesmen and acolytes of Fauci.

a reply to: lostgirl

Thank you for sharing this...I hadn't come across it until you let me know about your post.

I read through the entirety of the motion (in-depth through page 59, then skimmed until I go to the Conclusion), and there is some pretty damning evidence in there--evidence that many of us already knew of, but it's great to have it all in one place.

I will find it hard for even the naysayers to argue against the sound reasoning contained within this document--well, assuming that they'll actually read it and not just dismiss it because of who the plaintiff is.

I implore everyone commenting to read the document first prior to making their comment. Avoid willful ignorance in your discussion.

ETA: Well, obviously, I assumed too much that people would read it before making themselves look silly. I will not name any names.

a reply to: MDDoxs

You have brought zero value to this discussion, other than a "how-to" on using logical fallacies.

Well done?

Something tells me that you didn't read the document, you just looked at what was quoted and ran with your claims. There were more than two cases mentioned in the motion, and myriad studies and numbers from things like the CDC and VAERS.