It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Next, Kurylenko claims the gender swap is irrelevant, she explains, “Well, I understand that they swapped gender, but I think it’s irrelevant really whether the character is a female or male because who cares?”
However, the "M-she-U" won't survive if they're going to shove identity politics into their films. It's unbearably annoying.
Disney it seems they dont care they care about spreading a political agenda.
originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: Chadwickus
Did you even read it? they the swapped the role of the character in the movie for reasons..
originally posted by: HawkEyi
Disney and Marvels had the biggest flop so far at the ticket box office Black Widow since Star Wars Han Solo. Now the actor claims her Character is stronger then the Male Comic Book Version of it.
Yet the actor ignores that Disney swapped and tokenized for political reasons.
There are many reviews coming out calling it boring. Disney it seems they dont care they care about spreading a political agenda.
Taskmaster Actor Claims Her Character Is “As Strong And Maybe Even Stronger” Than The Male Comic Book Version Of Taskmaster
Next, Kurylenko claims the gender swap is irrelevant, she explains, “Well, I understand that they swapped gender, but I think it’s irrelevant really whether the character is a female or male because who cares?”
originally posted by: BrokenCircles
Personally, I don't care if it's male or female, I'm sure it's boring either way. Superhero films have been repeating the same formula for many years now. It's the exact same crap over and over. Hopefully these franchises are finally starting to die off.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: EternalShadow
I'm just pointing out the fact that Marvel has always been progressive. This isn't a new development.
I mean the very first issue of Captain America has Cap punching Hitler in the face on the cover. This issue was released in 1940. Over a year before the US actually entered the war. The cover was so controversial that Marvel (Timely Comics at the time) hired a security detail for the creators due the number of death threats they were receiving.
It should be noted that the artist for that first issue of Captain America was Jack Kirby. The same man that would go on to co-create pretty much every other big name Marvel character with Stan Lee in the 60s.
So if you're going to complain about Marvel being progressive, you're about 80 years too late. They've been progressive since before Marvel even technically existed.
Thats how that indoctrination is effective on the young imo.