Why are "captalist" US Corporations Directing the US Toward Progressivism and Beyond?

Greetings,
I almost posted this into the Political Madness forum, but this seems slightly more appropriate.

Greetings,

Just asking.

Regarding, the political progression of:
Capitalism ---> Progressiveism ---> Socialism ---> Communism
Namely, Apple Computer, Facebook, Google, AT&T, Twitter, Mainstream press, and the list goes on.
And the censorship of free speech as well articulated throughout ATS.

Is their bias toward the Democratic Party Ideology directed by:
The Bilderberg organization?
The Illuminati?
The Council of Foreign Relations?
The Trilateral Commission?
George Soros funded organizations?
The Clinton Foundation?
or any others from this list?

All of the above?

a reply to: Adonsa

They have enough money and influence it won't impact them relative to normal people.

If you erase half of Zuckerberg's wealth he can still buy and sell enough politicians to be above the law.

None of them are willing pay taxes if they can avoid it, but are more than happy to direct their wealth into pet projects, so that's all you need to know about their feelings on utopian progressive government.

a reply to: Adonsa

It’s from Chi-na

Probably had enough of capitalism and willing to give communism a go. After all, as we have historically seen with communist regimes, everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others.

They will have the monopoly if communism comes about, as no other person/organisation will be allowed to build any competitive platform.

a reply to: Adonsa

Because they like control and censorship and so does the democrats. The democrats open borders policies flooding in all the cheap labor is also a big bonus.

It's about globalism. The globalist agenda serves the money-hungry needs of Big Business (Big Tech, MSM, etc.). Open borders and free trade allow for cheaper workers, cheaper transportation of goods, more sales, and greater profit. Unfortunately, those very things screw the little guy and make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

Knowing that globalism would mean this and therefore become unpopular, certain philosophical ideals (particularly those that divide, such as Critical Theory, Liberation Theology, and Post-Modernism) were lobbied for and placed into educational systems.

Corporations must, by their very nature, thrive on community. The elite "clubs" are all about corporatism and the making of money. They know that socialism and communism create the perfect environment wherein a few can be rich (through the corporate structure), and most will be poor, owing their souls to the company store. "Progressivism" is merely the first step there...

In the end, it is largely all about money, though there is a spiritual aspect; that being, that only soulless immoral psychopaths would want to do these things to other living and breathing human beings, to do things that are diabolical merely to be rich and powerful.

The most powerful and wealthy companies are no longer capitalist in the classic sense.

The government keeps creating money which flows into the stock market, so the value of the stocks of the top companies keeps going up no matter whether they do a good job or not. Managers are awarded bonuses based on stock performance.

Since stock prices are eternally elevated, bonuses keep going up. In effect, the leadership of the top companies gets free government compensation regardless of market performance.

What is it called when you get free money from the government despite performance? It's called communism.

The top "capitalist" companies are operating on a government-sponsered Communist system.

Also, elite universities have been preaching communism since the 1960s, when they became a quiet haven for Communist intellectuals. Ivy graduates go to work at top companies where they continue to mouth the Communist platitudes they learned in college while also benefitting from "corporate communism" as described above.

The "little guy" and small business owner, of course, does not benefit from this unusual brand of "elite communism." The "little guy" must root, hog, or die in the most brutal of capitalistic systems.

It is a strange, inverted communism, where the elites absorb Communist ideology and function in a Communist market, rather than the "little guy" who was the focus of classical communism.

a reply to: Adonsa

We don't belong to any of the organizations that you mentioned.

We are cells and microorganisms in a bloodstream. Sort of an analogy.

Profit directs the corporate decision making process. Being in a corporation it legally limits personal liability. The first organization I know to form a corporation was the Vatican. This corporate entity was used to shield its members from the implications of their actions as they implement their corporate directives.

The general idea of an economy is good, reward good work, share our skills. The conflicts of interest that do arise as some use only economic measures to define good or bad has it problems. Hillary's pay to play, CPS and the foster care system. Covid subsidies for hospitals. These issues are important and do need funding, as for how it is currently structured and lacking some accountability has room for improvement.

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: Adonsa

Because they like control and censorship and so does the democrats. The democrats open borders policies flooding in all the cheap labor is also a big bonus.

But it’s not just Democrats. This is what everyone needs to realize- there are no “Democrats” and “Republicans” in Congress. They are ALL on the same team behind those closed doors of DC! They all work together and they aren’t working for us.

You HAVE to see this now, right? Every “Republican” has been fighting right alongside every “Democrat” to obliterate Trump. ALL of them! They wanted (and still do, even with three days left in his term- how does that alone not make people wonder why the hell they are so panicked??) him out of DC before he was even sworn in. Why? Because he isn’t one of them and wanted to blow up the sh!t they have all been up to for decades.

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: Adonsa

Because they like control and censorship and so does the democrats. The democrats open borders policies flooding in all the cheap labor is also a big bonus.

You HAVE to see this now, right? Every “Republican” has been fighting right alongside every “Democrat” to obliterate Trump.

All of them?

There is a fringe element that supported Trump and his claims of large scale voter fraud.

But yes, in the main, they have the running of the country and working on behalf of their sponsors pretty well sewn up. Most western Governments have.

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: Adonsa

Because they like control and censorship and so does the democrats. The democrats open borders policies flooding in all the cheap labor is also a big bonus.

You HAVE to see this now, right? Every “Republican” has been fighting right alongside every “Democrat” to obliterate Trump.

All of them?

There is a fringe element that supported Trump and his claims of large scale voter fraud.

But yes, in the main, they have the running of the country and working on behalf of their sponsors pretty well sewn up. Most western Governments have.

Which ones supported Trump and the election fraud claims? Lust the specific people, if you don’t mind.

And then we’ll look at your list of Republicans who supported Trump’s claims of election fraud, and lets see if they actually DID anything, or if they just said a few words and then went quiet.

We could also look at these “Republicans” and see what they did in both covid stimulus package processes. It sure is funny how trying to get $2K to every American takes so long, but they can get everything ready to impeach the President in just a few days. So we KNOW they can get things done quickly. But only when it doesn’t benefit us.

a reply to: KansasGirl

I don’t lust them, but here are the names of the Republican Senators who sustained the objection to the C.E votes of Arizona on the 6th Jan, due to potential voter fraud:-

Josh Hawley
Ted Cruz
Tommy Tuberville
Roger Marshall
John Kennedy
Cindy Hyde-Smith

There were also 121 Republican representatives that supported the objection.

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
a reply to: KansasGirl

I don’t lust them, but here are the names of the Republican Senators who sustained the objection to the C.E votes of Arizona on the 6th Jan, due to potential voter fraud:-

Josh Hawley
Ted Cruz
Tommy Tuberville
Roger Marshall
John Kennedy
Cindy Hyde-Smith

There were also 121 Republican representatives that supported the objection.

How many of them objected to merely save their sorry behinds and to get re elected?

Doesn't matter what they say to their serfdom, but what their voting record shows.
TALK IS CHEAP.

Federally speaking, the GOP is dead, most likely even at the state level of government. I myself have had at least six phone calls from them begging for money and enjoyed telling everyone of them to GFT.

to take us to Globalism and the NWO.. it's about total control.
My .02 anyway

According to Maslow's Hierarchy of needs, once basic needs (food, shelter, survival, etc.) are fulfilled, one then moves on to needs like belonging and status fulfillment. Once these are fulfilled, the highest need is "self-actualization": Fulfilling one's true potential and acting creatively. I personally also posit morality and altruism at the top.

Could it be that with survival and status needs satisfied, some at the top actually develop a sense of altruistic need to serve humanity?

Simple, the billionaires in control have allowed ideologies to become their main motivator. They actively say and do things which alienate a large portion of their customer base because they want to be woke, and it clearly hurts their profits. When billionaires care more about controlling the political landscape of the world than they care about money we are entering extremely dangerous territory.

Maybe some big corps want people to live by the same rules that many employees live by in the workplace 😃

a reply to: Adonsa

One world government leads to reduced tariffs on export and imports as well as making cheap labour universally available while at the same time standardizing markets across the globe, the fact is that the corporations that are in position to rule the government's at the time this comes into being will be the true power behind the world government that comes into being, they will be the real shadow government.

Not all corporations like this but some international organizations and corporations see it as the inevitable future and lobby, blackmail and buy out to get it to come into being.

They are NOT our friend's, corporations are not about right's, human or otherwise they are about there own profit only.

Corporations want to monopolize everything, abolishing anti monopoly legislation is also there goal.

The air you breath, the water you drink the land you live on and even your organ's are all resources as far as these inhuman latter day giants are concerned.

International boundary's and tariff's are good for competition but bad for nations whom corporations are suffering financially due to market restrictions placed upon them, many corporations actually also belong (huge shares) to a very small hidden controlling group whom are not too upset if one of there assets suffers a bit so long as there other assets make up for the downturn those suffering assets are experiencing, these are the shadow government cabal behind the scenes the ultra elite whom are even more hidden than the well known power players and whose names we at this level even on a site like this are unlikely to have ever heard of but they exist, that or the well known power players are more cunning than even they seem to be.

Government's are merely assets and pieces in there game of thrones, one thing keep's them back who is going to be the shadow emperor?.

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: Adonsa

Because they like control and censorship and so does the democrats. The democrats open borders policies flooding in all the cheap labor is also a big bonus.

But it’s not just Democrats. This is what everyone needs to realize- there are no “Democrats” and “Republicans” in Congress. They are ALL on the same team behind those closed doors of DC! They all work together and they aren’t working for us.

You HAVE to see this now, right? Every “Republican” has been fighting right alongside every “Democrat” to obliterate Trump. ALL of them! They wanted (and still do, even with three days left in his term- how does that alone not make people wonder why the hell they are so panicked??) him out of DC before he was even sworn in. Why? Because he isn’t one of them and wanted to blow up the sh!t they have all been up to for decades.

This is absolutely true. But the question posed in the OP is why does the msm and major social media platforms and corporations choose the democrats over the Republicans.

You are correct in your assessment that both political parties suck and both don't do the will of the people. Both want to take away our rights more and more so that they can control us more and more. However the democrat team has a plan to do it much faster.

I want both the Republican party and the democrat party to be broken up into a total of four or more parties. But as someone pointed out to me before, that needs to be done from the bottom up, not the top down. If I could choose one thing to do first it would be to immediately implement term limits for ALL politicians.