Absolute Proof the Earth is Round NOT Flat!

a reply to: AngryCymraeg
You are replying to posts so you are extending the thread.....5 pages of encouragement.

I bet you can't stop..... OCD or something?

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: turbonium1

I have long since given up trying to argue with your nonsense. You're a troll. Just admit it. Your nonsense has been disproved again and again, but you keep returning to the start of your nonsense again and again and pretending that it's somehow new. It's not.
So - who do you have this bet with to see how long you can keep this silly thread going? Must be quite a bit of money! Someone must be paying you, it's the only explanation for the nonsense you spout.

I'm explaining how the horizon appears to rise upward, which it DOES appear to, in fact.

That's what we see. A horizon appearing to rise upward in the distance.

That horizon which appears to be rising upward in the distance, is also completely FLAT. That's also a fact.


There is NOT any 'curve' at all, on the flat surface, which appears to be rising upward in the distance. That is another fact.


The only NONSENSE is your claim that there IS any sort of 'curve' to be seen at all!

Deal with the reality, or stay in denial, it doesn't matter to me.

a reply to: turbonium1

Rubbish.
Now: back to the REAL issue. Who's paying you or has a wager with you to keep this silly thread going? Come on, WE DEMAND THE TRUTH!!!

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
You are replying to posts so you are extending the thread.....5 pages of encouragement.

I bet you can't stop..... OCD or something?

I'm just trying to find out the truth. So - who's paying you?
(And if you're stupid enough to think that this is a real thread with a viable argument, then all I have for you is hysterical laughter, followed by the demand that you tell us who's paying you to continue this silliness.)

a reply to: AngryCymraeg
Why are you accusing me of being paid?

You have posted 5 pages of posts in this thread.....6 pages of posts in another FE thread.

How many posts have I posted in FE threads?

You must be getting paid to keep FE threads going.

Come on......I want to know the truth.... who is paying you?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

comedy pays itself..

You say it's nonsense, while you keep on posting here, to say how it's nonsense, and post again, to say it's nonsense, and repeat the same cycle over and over again.

If you really DID think it was nonsense, you'd have left the thread long ago. But you're still here, so why would that be?

Any issue I think is nonsense, is treated as such, I don't post on it. What would be the point of that? Nothing at all.

Why would you post here, over and over again, if you thought it was nonsense? You wouldn't post here if you thought that. It would be a waste of your time to stay here, right?

But you don't think it's nonsense, or you'd leave the thread, and never return to it.

Be honest with yourself for once. You HAVE A REASON to stay here, and it's certainly not because you think it's nonsense. Nobody buys that one.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Amusement is payment in of itself.
*Yawn*
What was your question again?

a reply to: Akragon
Angry does not appear amused.

a reply to: turbonium1

Yes, I'm here to point out that you're a troll. All of your points were disproved months or years ago. You've never had a leg to stand on. You're a troll and only an idiot takes you seriously. So - who's paying you to troll?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Oh, I'm amused.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Akragon
Angry does not appear amused.

ye think?

im amused, yet grieved... saddened... sometimes sickened...

all by flat earth

Hes just angry...

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: turbonium1

Yes, I'm here to point out that you're a troll. All of your points were disproved months or years ago. You've never had a leg to stand on. You're a troll and only an idiot takes you seriously. So - who's paying you to troll?

Your sole purpose is to call me a troll?


What is a troll?

a person who intentionally antagonizes others online by posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content Internet trolls In the late 1980s, Internet users adopted the word "troll" to denote someone who intentionally disrupts online communities'


You're the very DEFINITION of a troll, who's sole purpose is posting inflammatory, offensive comments about me, which you've admitted is your purpose here.


You're a troll who hasn't a clue he just ADMITTED his purpose is to act as a troll.....that's an amazing achievement!

It all makes sense now!

a reply to: turbonium1

Trying to stop. But when there is low hanging fruit…

Yea. Your a troll.

a reply to: turbonium1

Now address this…. Without changing the subject to a blatant lie like a troll..


With demonstrable proof the earth is spherical

TONGA VOLCANO ERUPTION SHOCK WAVES DETECTED IN CHICAGO

abc7chicago.com...

"The eruption was so powerful that the waves actually propagated all the way around the globe and then back again," meteorologist Gino Izzi said.

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: turbonium1

Yes, I'm here to point out that you're a troll. All of your points were disproved months or years ago. You've never had a leg to stand on. You're a troll and only an idiot takes you seriously. So - who's paying you to troll?

Your sole purpose is to call me a troll?


What is a troll?

a person who intentionally antagonizes others online by posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content Internet trolls In the late 1980s, Internet users adopted the word "troll" to denote someone who intentionally disrupts online communities'


You're the very DEFINITION of a troll, who's sole purpose is posting inflammatory, offensive comments about me, which you've admitted is your purpose here.


You're a troll who hasn't a clue he just ADMITTED his purpose is to act as a troll.....that's an amazing achievement!

It all makes sense now!

Oooh, fingerpointing. Thanks for the definition of troll - that describes you perfectly.
Now come on, what's the beef with making this silly thread stretch out so much? What did you bet to whom?

a reply to: turbonium1

"Appears to".

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

Now address this…. Without changing the subject to a blatant lie like a troll..


With demonstrable proof the earth is spherical

TONGA VOLCANO ERUPTION SHOCK WAVES DETECTED IN CHICAGO

abc7chicago.com...

"The eruption was so powerful that the waves actually propagated all the way around the globe and then back again," meteorologist Gino Izzi said.

Waves would happen on the flat Earth, which is a uniform surface, how would it possibly work on a ball Earth is the real problem here.

Waves resonate over flat surfaces, much more than around a spherical surface. This can easily be demonstrated, too.

If you dropped an anvil onto a flat surface, you'd feel the waves resonate outward, over that surface. Using a spherical surface, like a medicine ball or something, and dropped the anvil on it, those waves won't resonate around the ball, to the same point again.

This only supports the FLAT Earth, NOT a ball Earth.

I've explained this, so move along.

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

Now address this…. Without changing the subject to a blatant lie like a troll..


With demonstrable proof the earth is spherical

TONGA VOLCANO ERUPTION SHOCK WAVES DETECTED IN CHICAGO

abc7chicago.com...

"The eruption was so powerful that the waves actually propagated all the way around the globe and then back again," meteorologist Gino Izzi said.

Waves would happen on the flat Earth, which is a uniform surface, how would it possibly work on a ball Earth is the real problem here.

Waves resonate over flat surfaces, much more than around a spherical surface. This can easily be demonstrated, too.

If you dropped an anvil onto a flat surface, you'd feel the waves resonate outward, over that surface. Using a spherical surface, like a medicine ball or something, and dropped the anvil on it, those waves won't resonate around the ball, to the same point again.

This only supports the FLAT Earth, NOT a ball Earth.

I've explained this, so move along.

You've been shown up to be completely wrong all through this thread. Nothing you have said has been true.
Now back to the real matter at hand - who did you place this bet with about how long you could string this silly thread out for?

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

Now address this…. Without changing the subject to a blatant lie like a troll..


With demonstrable proof the earth is spherical

TONGA VOLCANO ERUPTION SHOCK WAVES DETECTED IN CHICAGO

abc7chicago.com...

"The eruption was so powerful that the waves actually propagated all the way around the globe and then back again," meteorologist Gino Izzi said.

Waves would happen on the flat Earth, which is a uniform surface, how would it possibly work on a ball Earth is the real problem here.

Waves resonate over flat surfaces, much more than around a spherical surface. This can easily be demonstrated, too.

If you dropped an anvil onto a flat surface, you'd feel the waves resonate outward, over that surface. Using a spherical surface, like a medicine ball or something, and dropped the anvil on it, those waves won't resonate around the ball, to the same point again.

This only supports the FLAT Earth, NOT a ball Earth.

I've explained this, so move along.

Good gosh.

And you changed the subject to an idiotic blatantly false argument.

Not talking about “surface” waves of the earth’s crust. Posting about the over pressure event in the atmosphere that should have only registered once if the earth was flat. Not twice from traveling the atmosphere of a spherical earth.

And out in the open atmosphere, there's not much friction to stop these waves. "It will circle the globe multiple times," said Blom. An atmospheric scientist at the University of Miami, Brian McNoldy, recorded six waves (as of Jan. 19) passing over the region. The waves traveling through the atmosphere are picked up by weather stations that record changes in the atmosphere's pressure, but are imperceptible to us. Eventually, the waves dissipate in the air.


mashable.com...

If the was flat, the atmosphere shockwave would have radiated outward and only registered one.

The atmosphere circled the earth because it is literally a globe / spherical. The leading edge, the peek of the atmospheric pressure wave circled the globe to be measured at different weather stations on the earth more than once. Nope possible on a flat earth. Period.

If your not a troll, your the densest person I know. So your just plain ignorant. Either way. You need to be ignored because you will literally lie, or your too stupid to argument with. You don’t deserve this attention. But you keep posting such ignorant arguments so easy to show you lie.