When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer?

1) www.researchgate.net...

This is a 2017 report on the science on whether or not non-ionizing radiation can cause cancer. I have been studying this for a few years now, since my mom got cancer, continuing the research after her death. There are literally THOUSANDS of studies on the biological effects of NIR (non-ionizing radiation). There is no question whatsoever that there are MANY effects that NIR has on NUMEROUS biological processes. The fact that people refuse to admit this (for economic and political reasons) means that we will continue to see cancer rates rise. I'm going to link a few studies that stand out from the list of studies included in my main linked study up top. The findings show many links to cancer.

Make the decision for yourself to their veracity.

2) Over 350 studies BEFORE 1971 www.osti.gov...: Bibliography of reported biological phenomena ('effects') and clinical manifestations attributed to microwave and radio-frequency radiation: ninth supplement to bibliography of microwave and RF biologic effects. Technical report
PDF link: PDF

3) academic.oup.com...: Leukemia following Occupational Exposure to 60-Hz Electric and Magnetic Fields among Ontario Electric Utility Workers

4) onlinelibrary.wiley.com...: Changes in levels of c‐myc and histone H2B following exposure of cells to low‐frequency sinusoidal electromagnetic fields: Evidence for a window effect

5) www.tandfonline.com...: Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation

6) www.spandidos-publications.com...: Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A) (Review)

7) www.sciencedirect.com...: Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage

So, let me have it. Who accepts these finding? Who rejects them? Why?

a reply to: JimERustler

As someone whose wife has cancer and the years I have studied it as well...

Our bodies are a battery and we have an electromagnetic field.

Our bodies when overall electrically negative (acidic) are fertile grounds for cancer.

Disrupting our electromagnetic field turns us more negative.

NIR disrupts our electromagnetic field.

So...

Absolutely.

In the early 1900's if someone died of cancer, the doctor would do an autopsy, write a paper and be famous.

In 2020, we are going to soon change our national cancer rate to 1/2.... 50% of all people will have to deal with cancer in their lifetime.

Now to be fair, poor eating habits, the #ty environment people live in, treated water and the crap food we are offered are all factors as well.

But NIR is a MAJOR factor that nobody cares to talk about.

S&F for the thread.

a reply to: Lumenari

My deepest condolences. Dr. Richard Sollazzo in Long Island might be able to help you. He helped my mom by getting prescriptions most hospitals won't give because he has his own insurance, and is working on a protocol that does some pretty miraculous things. Thought I should share that with you. Also Rebecca Lambert, she has a viable NED protocol that melted 50 out of 52 tumors in my mother. The two that got her were close to the bones, where it was hard to get medication to. But Rebecca Lambert is on to something BIG with her NED protocol.
richardsollazzomd.com...
nedbiosystems.com...

originally posted by: JimERustler
a reply to: Lumenari

My deepest condolences. Dr. Richard Sollazzo in Long Island might be able to help you. He helped my mom and is working on a protocol that does some pretty miraculous things. Thought I should share that with you.

She should have died about 5 years ago, according to the experts.

We didn't go the chemo route and did a whole lot of other things instead.

She ended up killing her tumors herself and is in a "spontaneous remission."

Her surgeon said that what she had done was "remarkable".

Her sarcoma doctor said what she did was "impossible."

American modern medicine as far as cancer goes is a racket, nothing more.

Sorry... rant over.

But your OP brings up a very valid point that people should consider when they or a loved one faces cancer.

NIR is a huge factor if you are willing to get rid of your cancer yourself.

As for your doctors?

They're not there to cure it.

They are there to treat it until you are out of money.

~ggrrrr~

a reply to: Lumenari

the entire cancer industry belongs in the LOL forum here. I am SO glad to hear about you guy's victory over those damn tumors. And sarcoma is a #ing terrible thing. F cancer.

a reply to: JimERustler

You see, the thing is there are a great number of studies which find the opposite. No, I'm not going to cite them, I don't do gish galloping. Which is what your OP is.

a reply to: Lumenari

As for your doctors?

They're not there to cure it.

They are there to treat it until you are out of money.

You lie.
My doctors, nurses, and technicians cured me more than 30 years ago.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: JimERustler
No, I'm not going to cite them

Okay, then get out of the science forum.

As I talked about in my thread Uranium 1, Human Trafficking, and the Occult

Specifically this post: HERE

In Kunkin’s book “ALCHEMY The Secret Of Immortality Finally Revealed”, he theorizes that the energy needed to sustain life can be recharged by allowing small amounts of non-ionizing radiation to enter a body by either drinking or eating organically radiated foods. Clearly this doesn’t work as well as thought since Art Kunkin recently died last April (2019)

One of the interesting items from Kunkin's research was that during his use of the NIR foods he claimed to have had more energy then he did in his younger days. Sure it could have been nothing more that the placebo effect, but it should be noted that he didn't have cancer when he died and that was after years (decades even) of eating NIR foods. just something to ponder, he may have been on to something with charging up his mitochondria so that the cells can replicate more then the typical 50 cycles.

a reply to: Guyfriday

small amounts in controlled dosages are one thing.... prolonged exposure for years on end another...

a reply to: JimERustler

Large amounts vs Small amounts. What exactly differs one from the other? Point is more research should be conducted on this, but given the noted ideas I'm not sure if the results would be accepted one way or the other.

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: JimERustler

Large amounts vs Small amounts. What exactly differs one from the other? Point is more research should be conducted on this, but given the noted ideas I'm not sure if the results would be accepted one way or the other.

Well, one difference would be the amount of energy... another would be duration of effect.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lumenari

As for your doctors?

They're not there to cure it.

They are there to treat it until you are out of money.

You lie.
My doctors, nurses, and technicians cured me more than 30 years ago.

I really don't care about what your opinion is on this topic.

~shrug~

Microwave and radio-frequency radiation: are the least of your worries.

There are so many chemicals that everyone is exposed to everyday that can cause cancers that microwave and radio-frequency radiation: are minor.

Scotchgard is the leading cause of breast-cancer in woman around the home.
But you know, who likes to struggle to get stains out??

The bleach and dishwashing powder will kill you long before the wifi...
oh yeah, and artificial sweeteners, those things are death.

You wanna die, drink diet coke, you wanna die a little slower? High fructose corn syrup!

a reply to: JimERustler

If you are scared of radio and microwaves, having negative effects on your body, shouldn't you be absolutely terrified of light?

It's thousands times more dangerous compared to radio and microwaves.

could all of the body be like muscles?
a little exercise and you are healthy.
to much and you pull a muscle.

as a chiled your immune system grows.
if you neve get exposed to bad microbes you immune
system can not cop when you are older.

maybe radiation is the same?
get exposed to a LITTLE your body now knows what
to look out for and what to do later in life.

you could say it is part of evolution?

I just wish it was Just a little.....

originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: JimERustler

If you are scared of radio and microwaves, having negative effects on your body, shouldn't you be absolutely terrified of light?

It's thousands times more dangerous compared to radio and microwaves.

lol have you ever got a sun burn? Sunlight DOES cause skin cancer.... I mean come on, isn't this common knowledge? Or are we literal apes?

a reply to: buddha

I wish it was a little as well....

a reply to: JimERustler

Sunlight DOES cause skin cancer

Yes. UV wavelengths are high energy, high enough to be considered to be ionizing radiation. But visible wavelengths, not so much.