It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
- We expect to have 250 intensive care units, and 550 monitoring units in Norway. This is the basis for the respiratory therapy we have. If we go beyond that, it is very difficult to point out areas in the hospitals that are suitable. For you need conditions such as gas supply, electricity, ICT and ventilation, says Flaatten.
Flaatten emphasizes that there is a difference between the respirators used for intensive care and the monitoring units.
- Another thing is that one must have a respirator for a patient to call it respiratory therapy. Then we had to have 1200 respirators, and we do not have that in Norway today. How many we have, we are investigating, but it is significantly less.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
Once people get hospitalized from a serious Coronavirus infection, they treat them using hospital respirators. In a first world country like Norway, we have less than 1,200 respirators for the whole population of about 5 million people.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
Once people get hospitalized from a serious Coronavirus infection, they treat them using hospital respirators. In a first world country like Norway, we have less than 1,200 respirators for the whole population of about 5 million people.
Er, it's because in normal circumstances Norway does not need more. Nor is it appropriate for countries to overstock medical supplies "just in case".
originally posted by: paraphi
It's the path fools take when all they do is complain during unpredictable crisis about the "should have done" and "with hindsight" and al that.
Today, Italy has 10,149 cases of the coronavirus. There are now simply too many patients for each one of them to receive adequate care. Doctors and nurses are unable to tend to everybody. They lack machines to ventilate all those gasping for air.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
Once people get hospitalized from a serious Coronavirus infection, they treat them using hospital respirators. In a first world country like Norway, we have less than 1,200 respirators for the whole population of about 5 million people.
Er, it's because in normal circumstances Norway does not need more. Nor is it appropriate for countries to overstock medical supplies "just in case".
It's the path fools take when all they do is complain during unpredictable crisis about the "should have done" and "with hindsight" and al that.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
Italian doctors report on not having enough equipment to treat everyone, this worldwide scandal because of WHO and health administrators unpreparedness has just begun - I predict that we will see these kinds of desperate cries from doctors & nurses worldwide.
Today, Italy has 10,149 cases of the coronavirus. There are now simply too many patients for each one of them to receive adequate care. Doctors and nurses are unable to tend to everybody. They lack machines to ventilate all those gasping for air.
Source #1: The Atlantic
Source #2: New York Times
-MM
originally posted by: RAY1990
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
I'm not sure what the WHO have to do with individual nation's ability to acquire ventilators?
As others have said it's not wise for a nation to stock enough ventilators for everyone. Items have a usable lifeline, need maintenance and are/can be expensive.
It would be like a nation like Norway stocking snake antivenom for all of it's population when under normal circumstances no more than 10 vials would easily be sufficient.
Prevention or rolling with the punches is the only real option with things like this.
CHAPTER I – OBJECTIVE
Article 1
The objective of the World Health Organization (hereinafter called the
Organization) shall be the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible
level of health.
CHAPTER II – FUNCTIONS
Article 2
In order to achieve its objective, the functions of the Organization shall
be:
(a) to act as the directing and co-ordinating authority on international
health work;
...
(c) to assist Governments, upon request,in strengthening health services;
...
p) to study and report on, in co-operation with other specialized agencies
where necessary, administrative and social techniques affecting public
health and medical care from preventive and curative points of view,
including hospital services and social security;
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
I disagree, if organizations like the WHO and other health administrators are not preparing us for impending epidemics & pandemics then they have failed in their mission to protect the general public.