It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A total of 55 blue whales were sighted or recorded in the past year, according to the British Antarctic Survey, which has been studying whale movements in waters surrounding South Georgia Island in the South Atlantic Ocean.
South Georgia was once abundant with whale activity, but hunting brought the animals near to extinction.
Now, populations of the blue whale, as well as humpback and southern right whales, may be close to a full recovery around the island.
---------
'To think that in a period of 40 or 50 years, I only had records for two sightings of blue whales around South Georgia,' whale specialist Dr Trevor Branch from the University of Washington, Seattle, told the BBC.
.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: johnb
Sadly I guess it won't be long till Japan, Norway etc say that their rise in numbers should warrant relaxation of the ban on hunting and killing them.
How many species of whale are there in the world?
90 species
There are 90 species of whales, dolphins and porpoises, known collectively as "cetaceans". From the enormous blue whale to the tiny vaquita and New Zealand dolphin, you will find information and amazing facts about many of these incredible creatures in our species guide
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Lazarus Short
Thanks for pissing in my tea!
I accept that Fukushima was a complete balls up but anything to support your statement that all marine life is doomed as a direct result?
And I guess this would ultimately lead to the demise of all or at least most human life as well?
Fukushima didn't help, but there was a lot of radiation in the Ocean already, lots of it natural, some from human sources:
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Lazarus Short
Thanks for pissing in my tea!
I accept that Fukushima was a complete balls up but anything to support your statement that all marine life is doomed as a direct result?
And I guess this would ultimately lead to the demise of all or at least most human life as well?
If we divide 3,750,000 PBq (natural Pacific activity) by 30 PBq (Fukushima), the total of all Fukushima radioactive isotopes in the north Pacific is 125,000 times less than what naturally exists. This means that maybe…just maybe…one out of every 125,000 counts registered on the YouTube video’s hand-held meter might have come from Fukushima.
originally posted by: Lazarus Short
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Lazarus Short
Thanks for pissing in my tea!
I accept that Fukushima was a complete balls up but anything to support your statement that all marine life is doomed as a direct result?
And I guess this would ultimately lead to the demise of all or at least most human life as well?
Pissing in other's tea seems to be my specialty here, and you're welcome. I can only refer you to repeated reports of starving seabirds. Their food sources have obviously died, but officials who should know better seem unwilling or unable to say "Fukushima." They scratch their heads and profess ignorance. I have also read reports of cross-Pacific sailors who found the ocean to be very quiet and almost without life.