The Trump Administration Asked The Supreme Court To Legalize Firing Workers Simply For Being Gay

Wait, you are saying you participate in illegal activities? As someone who supports the rule of law, how can you not hold yourself to the same standards and then ridicule others? "Do what I say, not what I do".

a reply to: underwerks

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: M5xaz

I'm not gay myself, but if i was, my career should not be jeopardized by my sexual preference.

What happened to the unalienable rights for every American where "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is concerned or is that only for straight people?

Similarly, in Canada, if I were to get a CRIMINAL CONVICTION for using a wrong pronoun, it would TODAY destroy my career for being a normal heterosexual.

What happened to the unalienable rights for EVERYONE "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is concerned or is that only for LGBT people?

LGBTs, STOP, JUST STOP your asking for special treatment and DOMINANCE over heterosexuals. You WILL get pushback and won't like the outcome.

EQUALITY for everyone means exactly that, equality.

There's an election coming up. Democrats don't have a leg to stand on. They're going to try to throw everything meanyhead thing they can at Trump.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Nor should people have to hide there sexual preference nether.

What makes you imagine gay people go around announcing their sexuality all the same?

I know plenty of gay people who don't go around screaming from the roofs what they get up to.

They are not all flaming attention seekers NoCorruptionAllowed, just people who come in all shapes and sizes.

Do they all have a job?

The amount of bias from the sources make it hard to follow what's really taking place with this issue. As they explain it, discrimination of gender or sexual preference (which goes both ways, it's a pun get it?) is not OK and trump should clarify his position on the issue. a reply to: andy06shake

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

No, you're supposed to jump up and down and praise them and tell them how strong they are and how much courage they have for not being afraid to tell everyone they're queer or lesbian.

a reply to: LSU2018

Well my brother in law and his partner are physiotherapists, they are gay.

As to the other people i know who are gay, i don't know really keep tabs on their employment status, they have mortgages and other financial commitments, so i would assume so.

a reply to: LSU2018

Or just treat them like any other person which is exactly what they are.

That works also.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

You would never have to even worry though, if you didn't brag or announce your "status" to everyone, or anyone at work, period.

Brag, like mention your wife or husband, girl friend or boy friend?

Can't remember a time I've ever had a job and didn't have a girlfriend or wife and never once bragged about it. I only talked about it if I was asked.

a reply to: queenofswords

Only the dumbasses bought it. Nobody with a brain fell for it so it's all good.

originally posted by: SKEPTEK
Imagine being gullible enough to believe this.

Then imagine that this gullible person's vote is equal to yours.

Would a tiered system be better based on how much someone trusts someone or how intelligent they are?

So dumb people then become the underclass with no voice, that sounds.....interesting....no wait thats awful.

Nothing in the world is more equal than 1 vote for everyone, thats how society has progressed, ensuring everyone has a voice.

a reply to: andy06shake

Any gay people i know or have met don't go around announcing their sexuality anymore than straight people do.

Then consider yourself blessed.

I know a few people who I avoid like the plague, not because they are gay, but because they won't shut up about it! Somehow they must be convinced that I really care about their sexual practices; I don't. I don't care about anyone's sexual practices unless

• I'm a willing participant, or
  
• I'm watching porn.

That's it. Under no other circumstances do I need to know and under no other circumstances do I want to know.

Now to be fair, there are probably a lot more gay folk that don't go around giving blow-by-blow announcements about their sex life (and I have no problem with them), and there are a few heterosexuals that are just as obnoxious about their sex life. I avoid them too, for the same reason. I'm not saying obnoxiousness is limited to gays, just that it is also not limited to straights.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: PhilbertDezineck

Not my cup a tea.

But if the rumors regarding the size of Trump's mushroom are correct i might not even notice, so you could be right.

Besides with today's democrats, the last time I'd heard someone talk about the size of another guy's dick was back in high school when drama queens had their hearts broken.

a reply to: M5xaz

You speak the truth buddy. It's getting ridiculous.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: drewlander

Well, they may wish to make some money, that could be a reason for one.

Not everyone enjoys the luxury of working for people they like.

It helps all the same.

I can't understand why any employers would care as to a person's sexual preference in this day of age.

Can you understand why they would care about a person's political interests? I bet you can.

a reply to: LSU2018

Whatever you got up to in high school is your own concern. LoL

Go to any working man's bar or pub and listen to the banter mate, plenty of dick jokes and references ta go around. LoL

a reply to: LSU2018

I can only suggest you bet in one hand and crap in the other.

See which one fills up first.

What have peoples political interests got to do with there employment status any more than there sexuality?

I thought your vote was your own, belonging to you, and not any darn employer.

a reply to: TheRedneck

Well, i don't consider myself cursed.

That would just be self-defeatist.

Fact is we really don't require to know what most people get up to under most circumstances as its nobody's business but there own.

Sure there will be rather a few nosy parkers out there who disagree all the same, our respective gooberments being on that list.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: M5xaz

So, You make an emphatic statement, even to the point of shouting NOW. A proclamation for sure. Majority rule. NOW.

When simply asked about the dichotomy there all you can do is deflect to the primaries and resort to an overly used and now way outdated slur to call the questioner. That's real big boy stuff right there, real Trumpian.

Majority rule NOW, yes !
But not with respect to Hillary who engaged in KNOWN ELECTION FRAUD

True sheep with no discernment.

originally posted by: clubheadjobby
a reply to: M5xaz

Justin Turd-eau? How mature of you.

All gays?

Lots of hyperbole.

Do you think we should be able to fire people for being gay?

READ MY POSTS ABOVE.
I am for equality, period, and no more.

Gays keep pushing the goalposts and do not want mere equality but DOMINATION.
That is the case with the ridiculous law passed by immature Justin - Jail time for using the wrong pronoun.
Seriously ?
Enough!

In Canada, the criminal conviction you can get for using the wrong pronoun with a tranny can get your fired, TODAY
Not hyperbole sadly but fact.

Now, in the US, you are getting the expected pushback.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: M5xaz

Similarly, in Canada, if I were to get a CRIMINAL CONVICTION for using a wrong pronoun, it would TODAY destroy my career for being a normal heterosexual.

Your sexual orientation would have nothing to do with why you were fired. You'd be fired for the criminal conviction.
Just as the law provides.

That law provides more rights to tranny than normal heterosexuals. That is NOT equality but DOMINATION which is why there will be pushback.

Once Justin is booted out in the fall, I fully expect this stupidity to be repealed.