It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As outlined in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies are supposed to weigh the environmental impact of any new policies they introduce. Strangely enough, federal agencies have almost completely ignored these laws when it comes to immigration, even though immigration-driven population growth has a huge impact on the environment.
Immigration transfers populations of people from lower-polluting parts of the world to the United States, where CO2 emissions are far higher per person. According to a CIS study, U.S. immigrants produce an estimated 637 million tons of CO2 annually, which is 482 million tons more than these immigrants would have produced had they remained in their home countries. Of course, this does not make immigrants responsible for global warming, nor does it mean that native-born Americans shouldn't do more to reduce their own footprints — in fact, the average immigrant in America emits 18 percent less CO2 than the average native-born American. However, it is dishonest to discuss large-scale immigration without considering the impact that immigration has on our climate. Overall, it is tempting to survey the nearly four million square miles that makes up the land area of the United States — particularly low-density states such as Wyoming, Montana, and the Dakotas — and conclude that America could seamlessly grow its population much more through immigration with minimal repercussions. The reality is, however, that most immigrants do not settle in rural areas. Besides, regardless of where they settle, a larger number of Americans simply means a larger amount of strain on our finite natural resources. As climate change continues to impact everything from water supply to biodiversity, lawmakers ought to think long and hard about the wisdom of exacerbating those effects through a policy of large-scale immigration-driven population growth.
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: Waterglass
I think I have the solution: all people in the US should live like poor people.
originally posted by: midnightstar
Lord almighty .
330 million people In the US out of which 5 million are here illegally .
Does ATS have a joke section ?
A dead broke illegal who is stuck living in some farmers shack
originally posted by: pavil
No even better......we should depopulate 1st world countries of their native born citizens, then bring in the more ecological friendly 3rd world people?
Problem solved.
originally posted by: midnightstar
your right must be 500 million so sorry .
5 million ten million makes no difference when put aside 330 million who are the Biggest polluters on the planet .
www.fairus.org...
here happy now this site says 12 million . so 12 million who come with what they can carry vers YOU .
Your only fooling your self .
how many times you just drop a wrapper on the ground as you walked or out the car window ?
I suggest sticking with the things illegals effect that you dont effect a 100 times as much it only cuts the ground from your feet .
Declare illegal immigrants citizens?
originally posted by: midnightstar
So I say Unless they have been charged with a felony declare them ALL US citations .
originally posted by: midnightstar
Acutely Regardless of the op environment impact which is still a weak stance to use I did read a few sites on the matter and must admit the number 12 million is underestimated BUT the number 60 million is as well lol .
Simple soultion NO way in gods earth will you every deport 30 million and if 60 million is correct it would cripple teh US as we only have 330 million total !!!!!
No way we can just ship out darn near 20 % or our population and still expect to run things right .
So I say Unless they have been charged with a felony declare them ALL US citations .
And hey Wags start rising you may finly get a raise .
So doesn't it appear that is Donald Trump is really trying to save our environment? You know his positions. We are all aware of global warming right? So uncontrolled Immigration into the USA will stress our water supply and farm land so its imperative that me maintain both as-is and keep population sprawl from taking more farmland. Wheres Al Gore? The Green New Deal is phooey as it doesn't address "breeding like bunnies" does it? Just look at the CO2 statement below. Go ahead and beat the article up as there are others also claiming the same. I say no to ILLEGAL immigration and maintain controlled immigration. We have too many people now.
SEATTLE—The highest proportion of overweight and obese people – 13% of the global total – live in the United States, a country which accounts for only 5% of the world’s population, according to a first-of-its-kind analysis of trend data from 188 countries.
An estimated 160 million Americans are either obese or overweight. Nearly three-quarters of American men and more than 60% of women are obese or overweight. These are also major challenges for America’s children – nearly 30% of boys and girls under age 20 are either obese or overweight, up from 19% in 1980.
Not at all, ship them all out, every single one, and flag them so they can never apply for legal immigration either.
Then we can eliminate the minimum wage for people younger than 18 who are living at home with their parents (actually, I'd like to see it abolished totally, but I don't see that happening), and allow them to work for as much or as little as someone is willing to pay them - as long as it is all voluntary (no child should ever be forced to work in a commercial environment, unless of course you're talking about at home).