-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

a reply to: daskakik

You are not thinking about the legal aspect. Evidence cannot be just leaked in some of these cases, it would be thrown out of court.
To bring justice, pain, etc, you have to show a bit, get the ball rolling, get public support. Get open source investigations going.
To bring the pain via the courts, that requires the legal means of gathering the evidence of crimes.
But, to keep it from happening ever again, you must let the public

1. know how they deceive
   
2. know what they are deceiving about
   
3. know how they operate (the playbook, using logical fallacies, using emotional responses to their benefit to confuse as apposed to rational logical thinking [this is the big one they seem to use alot - trauma trauma trauma; remember 9/11])
   

To me, it IS like the Matrix trilogy.
There are

1. red pills
   
2. blue pills
   
3. those who are awake but like the system the way it is, and benefit from that corruption (like the taste of steak, ignorance is bliss)
   
4. those who are awake and do not like the system the way it is and are fighting it (waking more ppl, mil assets, leaking truth)
   

We see the code in the system as apposed to the wool blanket that is covering most

a reply to: XAnarchistX

But that was an answer to an anon asking if voter fraud would be revealed soon.

qanon.pub...

But by 2425
it was:
VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!
VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!
VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!

a reply to: Skada

The legal aspect would be the same if Q posted the open source info as an anon. That is where the excuse breaks down.

That is the simplest way to introduce evidence even if nobody figures out the riddles. They could have done that "if they actually had everything".

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Skada

The legal aspect would be the same if Q posted the open source info as an anon. That is where the excuse breaks down.

That is the simplest way to introduce evidence even if nobody figures out the riddles. They could have done that "if they actually had everything".

I heard that the snuff video found on Weiner's laptop was leaked to the dark web but was quickly removed. Whistleblowers have been 'suicided ' all over the place. Assange, the most notorious leaker is holed up in a room, his life in danger every moment. As long as the cabal has any semblance of power, they're not going to allow damning evidence to be introduced

a reply to: PokeyJoe

I remember Cicada3301 brought up in this thread sometime last year, briefly.
Now that you mention it, Q3221 may have a connection. According to the Wiki page they (who ever they are) have been silent for past few years. Maybe they are using Chan boards for recruitment.

Find it interesting that the wiki page speculates they could be one of any one of the US intel agencies, including MI6 to clandestine hacker teams stretching all the way to modern Freemasonry. I always wondered if they were part of one of the Mossad divisions such as Unit 8200. Israeli intel teams are very good at all types of propaganda to suit their goals. Maybe even that recent UAE intel group (name escapes me at the moment) that hires former American intel agents.

en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: cherokeetroy

That’s the thing about Assange though - he himself hasn’t really leaked anything has he? Wikileaks has published plenty of leaks, but they come from other people who send what they have to Wikileaks. So they haven’t done anything but publish information.

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
they're not going to allow damning evidence to be introduced

You can't have it both ways. Either your claim is true or the anons have a mountain of evidence being used to take down the cabal. Which is it?

Also, regardless of the answer, the point was that Q could have done all the dot connecting, posing as anons, in the first months of 2017.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

It’s interesting to me that a giant “superfamily” of cicadas is set to come out this year after staying underground for 17 years. Perhaps that’s where Q ultimately comes from? 17th letter of the alphabet and all. IDK the connection just jumped out at me for some reason today.

a reply to: daskakik

Yes and then all of us would not have reached the point we are at now and we would not know any of the stuff we know now. The process is the plan.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
they're not going to allow damning evidence to be introduced

You can't have it both ways. Either your claim is true or the anons have a mountain of evidence being used to take down the cabal. Which is it?

Also, regardless of the answer, the point was that Q could have done all the dot connecting, posing as anons, in the first months of 2017.

No, I can have it both ways. It is highly possible that someone is sitting on a mountain of evidence and it is also possible that the cabal still has enough power that they'll fight against any release of that evidence. Using FFs seems to be their weapon of choice. Q stated that this isn't a game, it is war.

a reply to: daskakik

Exactly, they really switched, I believe when people started saying "Q" was getting people to not vote

reading some past "Q" drops though, you really see how much of a blatant fail things are


like last year when they said Trump already ordered the "DECLAS" etc

a reply to: PokeyJoe

But that has nothing to do with the idea that "Q needed the anons to introduce evidence". That was the excuse Skada gave as a reply to XAX when they said Q is just sitting on the info while people continue to be abused.

You just showed the goal post shift I mentioned earlier about it not being about the evidence but about prepping people.

a reply to: cherokeetroy

Someone? We are talking about a mountain of evidence in threads like these. Is it there or not?

easy enough to say afterward, which is how "Q" works, if they won the house "Q" could say "Red Tsunami"

they lost the house so it was "Part of the plan"

If they lost both, "Q" could say it is part of the plan to expose them with corruption, give them rope and let them hang themselves, everything will be exposed, etc

"Q" plays in basic cold-reading tactics, and charlatan "Psychic" performers

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: cherokeetroy

Someone? We are talking about a mountain of evidence in threads like these. Is it there or not?

I believe it's there and I believe that the cabal, with whatever remaining power they have, are willing to go to great lengths to keep it from being exposed. Humans are collateral damage

a reply to: PokeyJoe

what good does it do for the followers only though? what about everyone who doesn't believe in it, who rejects "Q" as the gospel

this is even more evidence of why I say "Q" is like a failed Marxist revolution, the theory that people need to be converted before anything happens, everyone has to become a Marxists ("Q" follower) before anything can happen, keep believing the religion, keep believing the snake-oil salesmen because eventually Utopia

this is how socialist and communists Revolutionary leaders get followers, this is how "Q" gets them

If the goal is mass dissemination of information... and yet the "Truth" is only reaching the already followers... it is worthless and one big circlejerk

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
I believe it's there and I believe that the cabal, with whatever remaining power they have, are willing to go to great lengths to keep it from being exposed.

You really can't see that if it is there, then it is already exposed?

Sorry but you can't have it both ways. We are not talking about someone with info on a floppy disk. We are talking about the mountain of "evidence" already made public.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
I believe it's there and I believe that the cabal, with whatever remaining power they have, are willing to go to great lengths to keep it from being exposed.

You really can't see that if it is there, then it is already exposed?

Sorry but you can't have it both ways. We are not talking about someone with info on a floppy disk. We are talking about the mountain of "evidence" already made public.

What public evidence are you talking about

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
What public evidence are you talking about

You have not been following the thread?

XAX said if Q has everything they are sitting on it while people are being abused.

Skada said Q can't leak it because it would be inadmissible in court.

I said they could have done it as anons in a couple months after Trump took office.

You jumped in saying "The cabal isn't going to allow it"

But others throughout these threads and in other forums say they have a mountain of evidence and "Here Comes The PAIN".

Either you or they are wrong because both things can't be true.

Codesucq look at the latest...









meth fueled m.A.L.I.C.E. is my favorite