WHY is NO ONE on ATS concerned with the IMMANENT threat of NUK EXCHANGE btwn India/Pak?

a reply to: TheJesuit

First, this thread should be in WW3.

Second, the countries in question have been trying to kill each other for thousands of years!

Third, as some Orange Guy said, “Who cares about some sh#-hole country”??

Fourth, any civil and sovereign country would consider their actions and, literally, the fallout, so the stuff doesn’t stay on one side of some unseen border.

This shizz has been going on for evah and, IMO, won’t stop any time soon.

And that, Charlie Brown, is the true meaning of war!

a reply to: Wardaddy454

Actually not pakistan was not crated till the parton of India in 1947 several years after nuclear weapons were first used in ww2. Basically the parton was if I understand it away to segregate Muslims and Hindi worshipers well when you tell people were to live that causes hard feelings. If they do have a nuke exchange that could significantly repopulate the earth 2 billion people live in India subcontinent and if you irradiated the himilayans you might be irradiating water supplies for part of China too.

a reply to: TheJesuit

Why ? You don't think it will happen? There are numerous news agencies with the same language as before the ME Wars and the search of WMD's and the MSM is SILENT like its a side bar here's just a few head lines: Pakistan Promises Retaliation, Makes Nuclear Threats After Indian Jets Bomb Its Territory- The Drive

Why do you think they would tell you even if one or two were used?

There's vids from early in Syrian war, .... i think it was, of nukes being used. Did you see or do you remember, there was a video of a blinding flash of such brightness that it was equal to greater than the brightness of the sun.

It caused a complete white out of the camera lens.

Only nukes give out a flash of such brightness that it equals the brightness of the sun.

In addition; what is not in the media is not talked about.

Whats not in the media is not there because someone or some people do not want it in there.

Because kebab is an impotent. Small dogs are always barking the loudest much like NK.

a reply to: TheJesuit

Well, simply because the world has the likes of Trump, MAGA, ISIS, and let's not forget Brexit to keep us busy.

The fact is hardly anyone gives a rats arse as to poverty-stricken nations like India and Pakistan saber-rattling their nuclear arsenals at one another.

Sad but true.

originally posted by: neutronflux
It’s been two or three days? Are we past the point of “IMMANENT” Maybe we can downgrade to lowercase now, and just be immanent?

Not while this Grammar Nazi is on guard. It's imminent!

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Pakistan and India will have to take a number.
Trump is currently busy at the moment, but will stop their nuclear war just as soon as he's finished preventing nuclear war with North Korea.

I saw someone in the thread about another head of the Vatican being locked up months ago for being a pedo say that they felt Trump had a finger in that too. Better ads that to the list.

AS for the question posed by the OP, it's not anything to be worried about at the moment, merely something to pay attention to...

a reply to: TheJesuit

I think most of us are, what are gonna do, start a drum circle? Not one person on this site has the ability to do anything about it. Collectively this site has no ability to do anything about it.

Because they have been shooting at each other my entire life.

Early last year India was shooting at China, and people panicked.

a reply to: TheJesuit

It’s kind of moot when you consider Russia keeps publishing a new nightmare weapon every week, tensions are slowly escalating with China, iran, and North Korea has in no way been ironed out. It’s a pretty ominous and fatalistic world view we are living in right now, and just one miscalculation or misunderstanding could set it all ablaze. So I don’t worry about it, I just live each moment as it comes. We are all gonna die anyway so why worry about it. If we blow ourselves up tomorrow, the universe will barely notice.

For one thing, the nukes are not pointed at most of us on here. For another, it’s not the war the Deep State wants to wage(what would they get out of it ). I mentioned India/Pakistan conflict on another thread but changed my post, so yah it was on my radar.

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

wardaddy454: Because this has been happening since before nukes were invented. Even guns.

teapot: Sorry, no. Pakistan only came into being at the Partition of India, 1947.

...and the reason for this Partition of India is/was (they do not play nice with each other)?

It was a conflict between Hindu and Muslim.

Simple if they wanted to they would have nuked each other already simple. No discussion needed

a reply to: TheJesuit

I hear Bradfords a prime target.

a reply to: TheJesuit



These two seem to have the correct mindset.

a reply to: TheJesuit

Who gave Pakistan nukes.

a reply to: purplemer

Abdul Qadeer Khan.

a reply to: andy06shake

Pakistan's own Dr Strangelove.

Quite the boy....
en.wikipedia.org...

Apparently still regarded

"serious proliferation risk".

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

wardaddy454: Because this has been happening since before nukes were invented. Even guns.

teapot: Sorry, no. Pakistan only came into being at the Partition of India, 1947.

...and the reason for this Partition of India is/was (they do not play nice with each other)?

It was a conflict between Hindu and Muslim.

Ideology? NOT AGAIN!! (so predictable).

I hate to say as much, but probably because nuclear fallout from an exchange would pollute the planet far less than India does on a daily basis already...