It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Extorris
this article is interesting. makes you wonder about that art collector who died in a trump tower fire a few years ago.
LINK
That is a fascinating read.
Meanwhile a question that was being asked last year, just got answered.
Warner: 'Million-dollar question' how Russians knew who to target on Facebook?
"Did they know this just by following political news in America? Did they geo-target both geography and by demographics in ways that at least at first blush appear pretty sophisticated? ?
www.cnn.com...
The Chief of Trump's Campaign for President secretly flew to Madrid and gave them all the campaigns confidential internal polling data so they would know what states and demographics to focus the Russian Pro-Trump Propaganda Operation on.
PAUL MANAFORT LIED ABOUT SHARING POLLING DATA WITH SUSPECTED RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE MEMBER
www.newsweek.com...
He also discussed Ukraine
What would you call it when the Chief of a Presidential Campaign secretly meets with an agent of the Russian GRU, the same people that would conduct an expansive election interference campaign and shares confidential internal polling data so that they could best target their efforts while discussing Ukraine sanctions and politics? Where that same Campaign Chief would direct the stripping of language condemning Russia for the Ukraine invasion from the RNC Platform at the convention?
Collusion.
Next question is if President Trump was aware that his Campaign Chief was colluding with Russian Gru on the interference campaign. Did Trump OK the trip? Did he not wonder why his Campaign Chief was off flying to Madrid in the heat of the campaign? Did Trump give the nod to stripping the RNC platform of the Russia/Ukraine language?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Extorris
this article is interesting. makes you wonder about that art collector who died in a trump tower fire a few years ago.
LINK
That is a fascinating read.
Meanwhile a question that was being asked last year, just got answered.
Warner: 'Million-dollar question' how Russians knew who to target on Facebook?
"Did they know this just by following political news in America? Did they geo-target both geography and by demographics in ways that at least at first blush appear pretty sophisticated? ?
www.cnn.com...
The Chief of Trump's Campaign for President secretly flew to Madrid and gave them all the campaigns confidential internal polling data so they would know what states and demographics to focus the Russian Pro-Trump Propaganda Operation on.
PAUL MANAFORT LIED ABOUT SHARING POLLING DATA WITH SUSPECTED RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE MEMBER
www.newsweek.com...
He also discussed Ukraine
What would you call it when the Chief of a Presidential Campaign secretly meets with an agent of the Russian GRU, the same people that would conduct an expansive election interference campaign and shares confidential internal polling data so that they could best target their efforts while discussing Ukraine sanctions and politics? Where that same Campaign Chief would direct the stripping of language condemning Russia for the Ukraine invasion from the RNC Platform at the convention?
Collusion.
Next question is if President Trump was aware that his Campaign Chief was colluding with Russian Gru on the interference campaign. Did Trump OK the trip? Did he not wonder why his Campaign Chief was off flying to Madrid in the heat of the campaign? Did Trump give the nod to stripping the RNC platform of the Russia/Ukraine language?
Aww
The nyt retracted this made up bs story today.
Just like don lemon said trump would do with his address.
Liberals always accuse others of what they ACTUALLY do.
Keep on getting run over by the bs train tho.
It is comical.
The story appeared on the front page of Wednesday morning's print edition. However, the paper was forced to publish a correction by early Wednesday afternoon.
asked how the original, incorrect version of the story made it to print, a New York Times spokesperson said, "We published a thorough correction and have no comment beyond it."
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Extorris
even the nyt walked this crap back yet you still will not