The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization

a reply to: purplemer

Circumference of the moon is 6,786 mi. How does that fit in?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You can work it all out in miles too if you wish. Infact there is a calibration found on the earth, moon and sun using old measurement sets

a reply to: purplemer

Next comes the black sun Saturn connection and break away civilizations i imagine?

It's all great science fiction purplemer but chances are our Moon is simply that, just a Moon, how it got here and where it came from is certainly of interest all the same.

a reply to: LitriumGem

The problem I have with this premise is that if the moon was put there by a prehistoric human race, how and why would there be any record of anyone who remembers a time before the moon?

Also as opposed to being created by man in prehistory could it not be the dead husk of a planet (maybe Niburu) who was catapulted out of it's orbit and destroyed by an exploding sun, caught in the Sun and then earth's gravitational pull?

Are there any mention of the seas before there were tides?

a reply to: purplemer

TBH I'd be more inclined to think the Moon is from another place and was used by another species to come here than the Moon being built by an Earth based species.
Perhaps the story of Noah's Ark is a reminder of long lost knowledge.

a reply to: gortex

Problem is an analysis of the moon shows it is mostly composed of Earth material with the rest from another planet.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: purplemer

Next comes the black sun Saturn connection and break away civilizations i imagine?

It's all great science fiction purplemer but chances are our Moon is simply that, just a Moon, how it got here and where it came from is certainly of interest all the same.

The numbers are the numbers. No science fiction in them what so ever. I wecome you to challange any of them. Did you know the moon fits within the earth fifty times.

I could going on. But I know its not to avail. People will think what they want and thats good by me. Look at the moon and its numbers. Have a study. Its very odd stuff. As I said before the writting is on the wall for all those that want to see.

a reply to: purplemer

The numbers are meaningless drivel and numbers such as KM are man made with no significance. It conveniently uses decimals in some places and leaves them out in others. What meaning do any of those numbers have?

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: gortex

Problem is an analysis of the moon shows it is mostly composed of Earth material with the rest from another planet.

Have you got any idea why this was said before passing further passing comment

Robin Brett, a scientist from NASA stated, “It seems easier to explain the non-existence of the Moon than its existence.”

You know what the surface is made of? Titanium Oxide.

In the 1970’s, Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcerbakov from the Soviet Academy of Science wrote an article called: “Is the Moon the creation of Alien Intelligence?” It was a very interesting article that asked some important questions. How is it possible that the surface of the moon is so hard and why does it contain minerals like Titanium? Mysteriously there are some lunar rocks that have been found to contain PROCESSED METALS such as Brass, the elements of Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 that have NEVER been found to occur naturally. Yet there are traces of them on the Moon. Uranium 236 is a radioactive nuclear waste which is found in spent nuclear and reprocessed Uranium.

More interestingly, Neptunium 237 is a radioactive metallic element and a by-product of nuclear reactors and the production of Plutonium. You have to ask the question: What is happening on Earth’s Moon? From where do these elements and minerals come from?

Many sicentifi studies date the moon at nearly 4.6 million years old.

Fifty moons fit into the earth.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Yes the numbers are dribble to those that dont understand there meaning, But I do and you can too.

Dont tell me something is dribbel without showing me what it is. If the numbers dont add up. Show me. For the only dribble i can see around here is your last post that contains no substance. Just slander

a reply to: purplemer

Still waiting for you to tell me about the significance of these numbers.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: purplemer

TBH I'd be more inclined to think the Moon is from another place and was used by another species to come here than the Moon being built by an Earth based species.
Perhaps the story of Noah's Ark is a reminder of long lost knowledge.

So are you saying that the moon is possibly Noah’s Ark? And that the legend is about fleeing another dying planet and not fleeing catastrophic locations on earth? I’ve definitely never heard of that theory before. That’s some mind bending stuff!

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: purplemer

Still waiting for you to tell me about the significance of these numbers.

I am showing you some of the patterns that exist. I answered the question. Covert from KM to miles and have a look for yourself. I could sit here and do it. But I am not here to convince you. As I said the writting is on the wall and there is plenty to read. If you like to read.

Why dont you try and be a little more constructive. I see negativity without basis. Do you not find the number patterns interest There is far more than coincidence here. I said stick to the facts and prove me wrong. Something to this point you have been unable to do.

a reply to: KKLOCO

So are you saying that the moon is possibly Noah’s Ark? And that the legend is about fleeing another dying planet and not fleeing catastrophic locations on earth? I’ve definitely never heard of that theory before. That’s some mind bending stuff!

Its just a story. But one I find intresting and one that seems to pop up in old mythology when you look deep enough.

Glad you liked it

a reply to: purplemer

There is no meaning in these numbers. Nothing in these numbers points to the moon being created by people or aliens. You keep posting these numbers as if they hold some significance, they don't.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: DictionaryOfExcuses

More like a large mirror in low Earth orbit to be positioned so as to light up the night sky over a specific area of the Earth.

Yep. "Artificial moon".

a reply to: KKLOCO

So are you saying that the moon is possibly Noah’s Ark?

There's supposed to be some truth in all old fables , perhaps the truth in Noah's Ark is stranger than fiction.

a reply to: DictionaryOfExcuses

I would maybe call it a satellite rather than moon, very little likeness to what people think of when they think of moon, and the moon is by definition natural iirc.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: purplemer

There is no meaning in these numbers. Nothing in these numbers points to the moon being created by people or aliens. You keep posting these numbers as if they hold some significance, they don't.

If someone or something wanted to leave meaningful expression within the language of mathematics this is how they would do it.

Comment on why they dont hold significance. You appear to making stuff up just to subdue you cognitive dissonance.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: KKLOCO

So are you saying that the moon is possibly Noah’s Ark?

There's supposed to be some truth in all old fables , perhaps the truth in Noah's Ark is stranger than fiction.

I concur captain. Ironically, this theory makes more sense than the traditional one we’ve been told — loading every species of animal into a boat in twos... hogwash! Their whole job would have been shoveling sh!t off the boat.

I’m particularly of the belief that the history of earth and our solar system, is far more complicated and crazy than the narrative we’ve been force fed.