Major Math Error Puts Widely-Cited Global Warming Study On Ice

despite our scientists best efforts to document and combat climate change, it seems there is no real great effort by all industries to really clamp down on environmental impact, because they will lose to much money and that is bad for business so until our global mindset changes and we put planet before profit its only going to get a lot worse , and when our natural habitats go , we go , and Id rather all those selfish #s were fired into the sun than keep going the way we are

originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: shawncgraham

Many of us have researched the evidence as well, and come up with the opposite view. As I said previously, I think a multi-disciplinary approach within the sciences is much needed.

which makes those of us question every scientific paper that comes out because a majority are peer reviwed by others who are BS artist.

originally posted by: sapien82
despite our scientists best efforts to document and combat climate change, it seems there is no real great effort by all industries to really clamp down on environmental impact, because they will lose to much money and that is bad for business so until our global mindset changes and we put planet before profit its only going to get a lot worse , and when our natural habitats go , we go , and Id rather all those selfish #s were fired into the sun than keep going the way we are

Dont worry. when 2032 rolls around and the breakaways leave youll get your wish.

a reply to: yuppa

can you elaborate on 2032 and the breakaways , what is going to happen then ?
thanks yuppa

a reply to: InTheLight

The role of common everyday clouds is not understood yet incredibly complex awesome forecasts of destruction are for sure on the right track?

This is the kind of science that is as useless as religions are for telling us what God is.

a reply to: 727Sky

Globalism push is where the real problem originated

It is somewhat understood as to cloud science but not necessarily understood in regards to climate change and global warming, that is the difference.

Science can only gather knowledge and belief from what is observed. Otherwise, it's just belief without evidence. Now how that knowledge is gathered should be in question.

a reply to: 727Sky

This is not surprising, neither the errors nor the quickness with which the media regurgitates the climate doom porn.

Also not surprising is the fact that the authors of the study with the bad calculations have yet to provide any substantive response, either to Nic Lewis nor to the Daily Caller when they reached out.

originally posted by: shawncgraham
a reply to: 727Sky
Poor polar bears! Their population is the bigest since the 1950s!

Hi Shawn, I really liked your post! and agreed with almost all of it, but had to highlight the ambiguity of the above sentence is all.

This link (not too much to read) will give you some interesting facts about Polar bears. 👍🏻
arcticwwf.org...

With respect
FA

Just for grins 😁

So if this cloud science is right, there's a chance that too many white clouds could be detrimental to the planet?

2 things:

HAARP
Chem trails

Lol, couldn't resist 😁

Humanity is warming up the oceans with nuclear fission causing increased water vapor that is a green house gas.

Increased carbon dioxide makes plants grow. We get more food when there is higher carbon dioxide levels.

If "Global Warming" was a not a political agenda (Ponzi scam) then humanity would have first made sure all heat from fission plants was used in heating buildings and not dumped in the ocean. The fact that the politicians are pushing more fission plant show that the agenda is is not based in caring for environment.

Of course humanity is changing the climate. The question is how much and is it for the better or the worse.

I like the idea of plating tree:s in Sahara to decrease the creation of extreme weather in the gulf of Mexico.

originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: InTheLight

The role of common everyday clouds is not understood yet incredibly complex awesome forecasts of destruction are for sure on the right track?

This is the kind of science that is as useless as religions are for telling us what God is.

Yea, the idea of CO2 being the main cause of climate change is being shouted from the roof tops, yet the role role clouds play is little understood! From what I heard, methane is far more important than CO2 in regards to warming, however, that isn't slowing down the cattle industry, a huge contributor to methane in the atmosphere.

The weather models have a hard time predicting a few days ahead, yet these climate models are considered accurate without knowing how the clouds are affecting the results? Clouds are one of the most basic factors in weather, yet they aren't sure of what they do to the climate? They aren't sure if the weather is warmer on a cloudless day or if cloudy weather will cool things down? Do these climate scientists ever go outside?

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Do these climate scientists ever go outside?

No. All their numbers are inside.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: 727Sky

So.. what does this mean? Global Warming isn't happening?

no, because they changed it to climate change, go figure

a reply to: sapien82

We had snow in South Carolina, and it was very very cold last winter .... so its heating and cooling at the same time!

a reply to: sapien82

Honestly, there has been a huge increase in legislation that actually regulates
clean air in a lot of states and other countries.

Huge regulations from small engines to large factories.

When is enough enough?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You may be closer than you think... all I'm gonna say for now...

Genius is mysterious... redneck even more so.

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

That's the Earth. Ever changing. People have a warm year and claim it's warming. They have a cold year and claim it's cooling.

Expecting the same weather year after year is kind of crazy.

LINK

"We are aware the way we handled the errors underestimated the uncertainties. We are working on an update that addresses this issue. We thank Nicholas Lewis for bringing this to our attention." (from resplandy.princeton.edu... ).

Well that's a breath of fresh air. The mistake has been admitted.

a reply to: Blaine91555

Don't worry next time we will get it right!