What percent DNA before you are considered Native American? Question to liberals.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: InTheLight

Being a habitual exaggerated isnt inherently the same thing as being a pathological liar.

And all politicians lie (including Trump).

So she attacks him for becoming what she already was (lying politician) for how many years before him?

Keep telling yourself that, so you feel better.

a reply to: InTheLight

To go around exclaiming "I'm such and such" when you've got 3% is a bit asburd, no?

We're all mutts, whose inbreeding ancestors came across Turkey-Israel, from Africa, and raped Neanderthals, eons ago.

This whole "controversy" is silly low level racism dripping with high level hypocrisy, and a tabloid rag veneer.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: InTheLight

Being a habitual exaggerated isnt inherently the same thing as being a pathological liar.

And all politicians lie (including Trump).

So she attacks him for becoming what she already was (lying politician) for how many years before him?

Keep telling yourself that, so you feel better.

Claiming that Elizabeth Warren is not a liar? You can’t be serious.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: InTheLight

Being a habitual exaggerated isnt inherently the same thing as being a pathological liar.

And all politicians lie (including Trump).

So she attacks him for becoming what she already was (lying politician) for how many years before him?

Keep telling yourself that, so you feel better.

Oh thats right only the ones you dont worship are liars. Yep!!

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: InTheLight

Being a habitual exaggerated isnt inherently the same thing as being a pathological liar.

And all politicians lie (including Trump).

So she attacks him for becoming what she already was (lying politician) for how many years before him?

Keep telling yourself that, so you feel better.

Oh thats right only the ones you dont worship are liars. Yep!!

Keep telling yourself little lies so you feel better.

By this logic Barak Obama and Whoopi Goldberg are NOT black, they’re most definitely WHITE in every sense of the word.

Right?

Or is someone going to claim they have less the 0.9% ‘white’ dna?

a reply to: InTheLight

I'm not a partisan so I'm one of the few who doesnt get off on self-deception about all this tribalism nonsense. I get off on skewering such lunacy, and cracking jokes.

But most people into these threads:

During the run-up to the 2004 presidential election, while undergoing an fMRI bran scan, 30 men--half self-described as "strong" Republicans and half as "strong" Democrats--were tasked with assessing statements by both George W. Bush and John Kerry in which the candidates clearly contradicted themselves. Not surprisingly, in their assessments Republican subjects were as critical of Kerry as Democratic subjects were of Bush, yet both let their own candidate off the hook.

The neuroimaging results, however, revealed that the part of the brain most associated with reasoning--the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex--was quiescent. Most active were the orbital frontal cortex, which is involved in the processing of emotions; the anterior cingulate, which is associated with conflict resolution; the posterior cingulate, which is concerned with making judgments about moral accountability; and--once subjects had arrived at a conclusion that made them emotionally comfortable--the ventral striatum, which is related to reward and pleasure.

"We did not see any increased activation of the parts of the brain normally engaged during reasoning," Westen is quoted as saying in an Emory University press release. "What we saw instead was a network of emotion circuits lighting up, including circuits hypothesized to be involved in regulating emotion, and circuits known to be involved in resolving conflicts." Interestingly, neural circuits engaged in rewarding selective behaviors were activated. "Essentially, it appears as if partisans twirl the cognitive kaleidoscope until they get the conclusions they want, and then they get massively reinforced for it, with the elimination of negative emotional states and activation of positive ones," Westen said. www.scientificamerican.com...

Meaning most partisans are effectively dope fiends for self-deception regarding their tribes and its leadership elements.

Its literally in our DNA, to become as such once we accept a tribe 'into our hearts'.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

It's all about that feeling of 'belonging' isn't it?

Instead of putting this up for a guessing game I think it's better to find out what Native Americans consider to be Native American. Some require a minimum of 50% while others consider you to be Native American if you have any Native American Ancestry.

LINK

a reply to: InTheLight

For the Tribalist (partisan), yes. And the quazi dope fiend (dopamine) rush a Tribalist gets when they self-deceived themselves to prop up the tribe in their own mind.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Seems it should be at least 33.333%.

Of course the Big Story is how everyone is overlooking the fact we're all 99.99% the same DNA. Meaning we're all trivializing the 1/1024th of the 0.01% DNA we all share.

So, now you are determining what percentage is acceptable?

Yes, that is the whole point of the entire thread, to give your opinion. You keep posting, maybe you can give yours? You can also tell us who should be determining what percentage is acceptable.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: InTheLight

For the Tribalist (partisan), yes. And the quazi dope fiend (dopamine) rush a Tribalist gets when they self-deceived themselves to prop up the tribe in their own mind.

What the hell?

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: InTheLight

To go around exclaiming "I'm such and such" when you've got 3% is a bit asburd, no?

3% would be 1/33. She is actually 1/1100, she is about .09%. She is actually half the amount of the average white person in America.

a reply to: BlackJackal

There is no guessing game. I am asking opinions. There is no wrong answer.

Perhaps she identifies with "Apoo"?.....Oh sorry, not that Indian.

Will have to add "NA" to the group of "Identities",

So LGBTLAVIOUABC etc....... becomes, LGBTWHONOSHOO....+ NA.

Perhaps her European part is from Finland.......maybe she is .0999% Saami and Ugric....who are, genetically, almost the same as the American Indigenous peoples, as they all originated from Siberia, and have Neanderthal/Denisovan/Aust. Native unknown DNA + Indo European, from that part of the World.
They even build the same type of Teepees.

SCREW DNA...ALL YOU NEED IS A COOKBOOK!

Warren Campaign Offered Cousin's Cookbook as Proof of Native American Ancestry

www.breitbart.com...

What's even MORE ridiculous...is that Warren submitted Cherokee "family" recipes...she plagiarized!
Her submitted recipes are all signed "Elizabeth Warren- Cherokee"



POW WOW CHOW Cookbook:

"Boston Radio host Howie Carr discovered that three of Warren’s recipes appeared to be plagiarized[12]:

The two recipes, “Cold Omelets with Crab Meat” and “Crab with Tomato Mayonnaise Dressing,” appear in an article titled “Cold Omelets with Crab Meat,” written by Pierre Franey of the New York Times News Service that was published in the August 22, 1979 edition of the Virgin Islands Daily News, a copy of which can be seen here.

Ms. Warren’s 1984 recipe for Crab with Tomato Mayonnaise Dressing is a word-for-word copy of Mr. Franey’s 1979 recipe.

Mrs. Warren’s 1984 recipe for Cold Omelets with Crab Meat contains all four of the ingredients listed in Mr. Franey’s 1979 recipe in the exact same portion but lists five additional ingredients.

More significantly, her instructions are virtually a word for word copy of Mr. Franey’s instructions from this 1979 article. Both instructions specify the use of a “seven inch Teflon pan.” …

Ms. Warren’s instructions are word-for-word copies of Mr. Franey’s 1979 instructions for this recipe, with one exception.

Ms. Warren says, “Let cook until firm and lightly brown…” and Mr. Franey says “Let cook until firm and lightly browned…” [emphasis added] …

The third potentially plagiarized recipe, “Herbed Tomatoes,” appears to be copied from this 1959 recipe from Better Homes and Garden."

elizabethwarrenwiki.org...

originally posted by: BlackJackalwhile others consider you to be Native American if you have any Native American Ancestry.

Which ones do that? Every white person in America can enroll with them, I would love to do it.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: BlackJackal

There is no guessing game. I am asking opinions. There is no wrong answer.

No you are not, your opinion is that she has 0% Native American DNA, and so here we are.

a reply to: InTheLight

Did you read my big post above (with the citation)?

Brain scans have PROVED that partisans (tribalists) get HIGH from self-deceiving themselves about their tribal 'whatever' (membership, leadership, mantras, ideals, etc).

Look up "motivated reasoning", then look up the power tribalism has on our brains/minds. This is all lizard brain un/sub conscious stuff. And tribalism sends this self-deception sort of dynamics off the charts, as compared to something someone would enjoy that has nothing to do with tribalism. And thats why millions kill each other per decade over 'racism' 'religion' etc stuff, but not because of, I dont know, BBQ ribs.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: BlackJackal

There is no guessing game. I am asking opinions. There is no wrong answer.

No you are not, your opinion is that she has 0% Native American DNA, and so here we are.

Sorry, stop lying. It's disgusting. She has .09% DNA from areas in South America iirc. So get back on topic and stop lying.