Parkland survivor raises thousands to place billboard of Trump's anti-Cruz tweet in Texas

a reply to: JIMC5499

They want you to think that they have thousands of people contributing to this

Do you have proof that it wasn't?

I dont get why so many people hate David Hogg so much. I mean hes a kid and witnessed some terrible #. Americans and there guns. Like the 2nd ammendment was made long before assault rifles ever were a possibility.

Being one of Ted's constituents..its pretty crazy to drive around and see a massive amount more Beto signs than Ted Cruz signs. I actually only remember seeing 1 Cruz sign anywhere. In a town that tends to vote 65-70% straight ticket Republican, the fact he's being challenged here is pretty surprising. Most of the people I've seen say they are actually voting for him are just doing it because he isnt Beto.

a reply to: neo96

Do you have proof?

a reply to: wylekat

Either Trump meant what he said, or he lied. Pretty simple.

And it has nothing at all to do with Schrodinger's cat. That's a scientific paradox. Trump couldn't understand it, doubtful that any other politician could either. I'm not entirely sure that you do either, judging by your use of it.

Schrodinger's cat explained

originally posted by: wylekat
a reply to: rollanotherone

So, you're an idealist? How's that working out for you?

I'm past the point of pessimism. I'm now just waiting out my time on this accursed rock. I'm done living in a world where little green slips of paper and numbers in a bank account make someone a god, while any actual, real talents or abilities are laughed at. Logic, commonsense- none of that matters any more.

You all like thinking this is all normal, wonderful, and possibly even sexy- go for it. I'm going to treat it like a half rotted, maggot eaten rat corpse, myself.

Amen brother. I feel ya. Except, I do what you do while voting republican. Only for the laughs. It's funnier on the right.

a reply to: Southern Guardian



They couldn't get one of the Housewives of Dallas™ to shill? Really? I find that hard to fathom those Ladies don't have a censor. I'd get one of them.

originally posted by: wylekat
a reply to: Arnie123

Go watch two lawyers duke it out in court, then watch as they walk up to each other, shake hands and grab lunch lmfao.

Yeah. Saw that Monday between a corrupt judge and lawyers looking to suck money from people any way they could. Brrr.

BTW- they never taught that sh** in school.

You never took Government? My teach was a tote political hack and would divest from the curriculum to rant about the state of politics, at the very least, a basic understanding...

Meh, I guess it depends on your instructor, ours was known as the Monopoly guy, he totes looked like him 🤣 mustach and all 😂

originally posted by: wylekat
a reply to: Arnie123

Now go and study up on the culture of politics.

No thanks. I tend to shy away from disgusting filth like these sort of politics.

If you think this is normal, allowable, and fine... I'd question my sanity and many other things.

I just have no words I can use for politics, especially this sort of indescribable perversion.

I'm sorry, if you didn't like the answers, perhaps you shouldn't ask, it is what it is 😌 and the political scene isn't for the naive.

Throw in human nature, obviously, and the result is a culture of Me, Them and "wannabe neutral but still root for a side type deal".

What other politics is there? Lol, pretty sure this has been normal since its inception, this is the hurdle, so to speak.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

Do you have proof that there was? Professionally done art and printing. Professional protesters. This kid and his family being flown here and there. Somebody's footing the bill. If you want to believe that it is funded by thousands of people sending money, fine that's your right. By the way can I interest you in a bridge that I have for sale?

a reply to: Joecanada11

I don't hate him. I pity him. As soon as he is no longer useful to push the agenda, he'll be cast aside like a used kleenex.

a reply to: JIMC5499

So your answer is no.

You have no proof.

But you really want it to be true.