WHAT??? Judge dismisses all charges against 3 'extremist Muslim' New Mexico compound suspects

For starters, those defending this scum are reprehensible.

Wahhaj is accused of abducting his son Abdul Ghani Wahhaj from Georgia. The 3-year-old boy's remains were found at the compound days after the raid.

And as Phage pointed out, new charges were filed against two of the suspects. It appears this may indeed be expected-incompetence from government officials vs. a concerted effort to release them into the wind

appears

a reply to: Phage

From your article.

District Judge Emilio Chavez made the decision Wednesday in the first hearing. He dropped the charges, which he said can be refiled, against Lucas Morten, Hujrah Wahhaj, and Subhannah Wahhaj saying the prosecution failed to hold a preliminary hearing to prove probable cause within ten days of their first court appearance.

So yes, two of the five were charged with other crimes and lkept in jail, the other three were let go.

The article also explains why the prosecutors did not file within 10 days that resulted in the release.

Prosecutors tried explaining to the judge that they didn't hold a preliminary hearing because they expected the defendants to be released from jail. If that would have happened, prosecutors would have had a total of 60 days to hold a preliminary hearing.

“What I would argue is that every day we expected them to be released from custody because they’re on an unsecured bond,” said one of the prosecutors.

The suspects were not released because they couldn't find housing in Taos County, one of the conditions of release.

www.kob.com...

Is it common for prosecutors to make this mistake?

Everything about this case seems, odd, as I mentioned in my first post on this.

originally posted by: RadioRobert



Or, alternatively, there is another reason the office declined to pursue those three suspects. Which is possible.

When you put it together with everything else about the case (publicly known, anyway) so far such as the bail thing, the dead child found, the bulldozing of evidence and tension between local cops and the FBI, it starts to seem like one of those undercover nefarious normally illegal situations our intelligence agencies have going on all over the place.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

You should have written "another Liberal judge" drops charges against Muslim extremists who were training children to commit mass shootings in schools." Then there is the body of the child of one of the jihadists who died because his father decided not to give him his medication...

a reply to: KansasGirl

I wouldn't be completely stunned if someone connected was an asset. But none of these guys were released from custody, and they are all being held until the next hearing on other existing charges. The old charges can be refiled with the court or through an indictment. I'd suspect an asset would have no problem finding a mysterious person to arrange local housing to satisfy the bail condition before disappearing.

The bail conditions were ridiculous. The bulldozing was interesting, but doesn't mean much to me to be honest. This seems like a cockup.

a reply to: Grambler

It's not common, but not completely unheard of.


Also, perhaps slightly relevant Chavez was censured as a prosecutor for issuing (94!) subpoenas before obtaining indictments in multiple cases. So he might be diligently toeing the line on prosecutorial conduct. Which is good. We should all be happy we live in a country that makes the government play by the rules when trying to prosecute you. Be mad at the prosecutor's office.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

The Judges name is Emilio Chavez....Gee I wonder why he would help out Illegals? Hmm, where does the name Chavez currently originate from?

a reply to: IlluminatiTechnician

Oh, stop.

a reply to: IlluminatiTechnician

Wow, you're really clever

a reply to: Grambler

Is it common for prosecutors to make this mistake?

I wouldn't say common. But it does happen.

Mistakes, that is.

originally posted by: manuelram16
The Deep State wants you to look the other way..... they don't train school shooters

We should Move this thread to the MEGA thread Crazy Reported News That Was Quickly Dropped & Never Heard Of Again

It seems obvious that's what some authorities want.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: Vasa Croe


They found remains of a kidnapped child on the property....not sure how something like this can just be dismissed.

.

If the CIA is involved anything can be covered up.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Prosecution screwed up. That's what this amounts to. The judge isn't to blame here

a reply to: Vasa Croe

double post

originally posted by: RadioRobert
This is a dropped ball by the prosecutor if they didn't schedule a hearing. The preliminary hearing is to establish probable cause. This tells us nothing about the quality of evidence assembled. It just tells us the prosecutor's office is inept.


Or, alternatively, there is another reason the office declined to pursue those three suspects. Which is possible.

I do NOT believe that the prosecutors "forgot" to file their case. I call bovine feces. This was done with intent and forethought.

a reply to: incoserv

I do NOT believe that the prosecutors "forgot" to file their case.

Good. Because that's not what happened.

a reply to: Phage

Emotions are high....damn the system they are guilty and apparently known rules in place for the State to follow move damned!

a reply to: ownbestenemy1

Yeah. Rotten people, no doubt.

Too bad we're a nation of laws. Right?

Charges can, and surely will be, refiled against the third as well.

a reply to: Phage
Exactly. But corners of the Internet know they are bad so it must be a conspiracy that the state let them go. Never mind the other charges that could be levied upon them. It's a cover up.

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Well charges against some of the men still are being applied.

But this whole story is fishy.

The facts surrounding the compound, the connections to an imam who is famous in new york and was accused of being involved in the original WTC bombing, the judge leaving the men out with basically no money paid for bail, the cops (or fbi cant remember) bulldozing the crime scene, and now this.

Something is going on here.

Agree this is fishy - muted coverage and charges being dropped makes me suspicious that this leads back to some people that can't be touched.

This whole thing warrants a good old ATS investigation - where's Ignoranceisbliss?

a reply to: Grambler

It's probably not common, but at the same time how common is it for someone to post bail and not be able to be released due to lack of housing?